Cargando…

How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?

BACKGROUND: Recently, a survey was performed as part of a larger study at the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) to develop and pilot a series of tools to measure the uptake and use of PHAC-produced or -supported knowledge products by its key partners and stakeholders. This article aims to i) exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonmyr, Lil, Martin, Wendy K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25430613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-65
_version_ 1782349082582319104
author Tonmyr, Lil
Martin, Wendy K
author_facet Tonmyr, Lil
Martin, Wendy K
author_sort Tonmyr, Lil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, a survey was performed as part of a larger study at the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) to develop and pilot a series of tools to measure the uptake and use of PHAC-produced or -supported knowledge products by its key partners and stakeholders. This article aims to i) examine the uptake and use of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2008 (CIS-2008) and to ii) assess the utility of a knowledge uptake survey for collecting performance measurement data. METHODS: Using the knowledge utilization ladder as a theoretical framework, a short survey was developed around the themes of reception, cognition, conversation, reference, effort, influence, and implementation. The survey was administered electronically to potential end-users of the CIS-2008. The final sample comprised 85 respondents. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the majority of the respondents were aware of CIS-2008 and had read and used it. A wide array of disciplines and sectors were identified as end-users. Types of use included discussion of CIS data with social workers, child welfare and health advocates, students, medical and legal professionals, and senior government decision makers. Further, CIS was referenced in reports, articles, policy research, community programs, and funding proposals and was used to influence or support the development of policies, programs, and projects. Valuable information on the use of surveillance reports, such as CIS-2008, can be gathered from a brief survey that was easy to administer, cost effective, and that respondents needed minimal time to complete. CONCLUSIONS: Piloting of the survey demonstrated that the tool, while not perfect, is quite useful for capturing performance measurement information; CIS-2008 is appreciated and used. There is an increased recognition of the importance of the CIS as a unique source of Canadian child maltreatment surveillance data that can influence and lead to the implementation of new programs and policies. Although suggestions for improvement of the CIS-2008 were provided, the present findings offer support for ongoing national child maltreatment surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42669492014-12-16 How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada? Tonmyr, Lil Martin, Wendy K Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Recently, a survey was performed as part of a larger study at the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) to develop and pilot a series of tools to measure the uptake and use of PHAC-produced or -supported knowledge products by its key partners and stakeholders. This article aims to i) examine the uptake and use of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2008 (CIS-2008) and to ii) assess the utility of a knowledge uptake survey for collecting performance measurement data. METHODS: Using the knowledge utilization ladder as a theoretical framework, a short survey was developed around the themes of reception, cognition, conversation, reference, effort, influence, and implementation. The survey was administered electronically to potential end-users of the CIS-2008. The final sample comprised 85 respondents. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the majority of the respondents were aware of CIS-2008 and had read and used it. A wide array of disciplines and sectors were identified as end-users. Types of use included discussion of CIS data with social workers, child welfare and health advocates, students, medical and legal professionals, and senior government decision makers. Further, CIS was referenced in reports, articles, policy research, community programs, and funding proposals and was used to influence or support the development of policies, programs, and projects. Valuable information on the use of surveillance reports, such as CIS-2008, can be gathered from a brief survey that was easy to administer, cost effective, and that respondents needed minimal time to complete. CONCLUSIONS: Piloting of the survey demonstrated that the tool, while not perfect, is quite useful for capturing performance measurement information; CIS-2008 is appreciated and used. There is an increased recognition of the importance of the CIS as a unique source of Canadian child maltreatment surveillance data that can influence and lead to the implementation of new programs and policies. Although suggestions for improvement of the CIS-2008 were provided, the present findings offer support for ongoing national child maltreatment surveillance. BioMed Central 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4266949/ /pubmed/25430613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-65 Text en © Tonmyr and Martin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tonmyr, Lil
Martin, Wendy K
How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?
title How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?
title_full How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?
title_fullStr How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?
title_full_unstemmed How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?
title_short How has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in Canada?
title_sort how has child maltreatment surveillance data been used in canada?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25430613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-65
work_keys_str_mv AT tonmyrlil howhaschildmaltreatmentsurveillancedatabeenusedincanada
AT martinwendyk howhaschildmaltreatmentsurveillancedatabeenusedincanada