Cargando…

Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis

BACKGROUND: This split-mouth, double-blind randomized controlled trial evaluated radiographic changes in infrabony defects treated with open flap debridement (OFD) or OFD associated with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) after a 24–month follow-up. The radiographic distance from the CEJ to the bottom o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer, Chambrone, Daniela, Pasin, Ivan Munhoz, Conde, Marina Clemente, Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes, de Lima, Luiz Antônio Pugliesi Alves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-149
_version_ 1782349086379212800
author Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
Chambrone, Daniela
Pasin, Ivan Munhoz
Conde, Marina Clemente
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
de Lima, Luiz Antônio Pugliesi Alves
author_facet Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
Chambrone, Daniela
Pasin, Ivan Munhoz
Conde, Marina Clemente
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
de Lima, Luiz Antônio Pugliesi Alves
author_sort Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This split-mouth, double-blind randomized controlled trial evaluated radiographic changes in infrabony defects treated with open flap debridement (OFD) or OFD associated with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) after a 24–month follow-up. The radiographic distance from the CEJ to the bottom of the defect (BD) was considered the primary outcome. CEJ-BC and defect angle were secondary outcomes. METHODS: Ten patients presenting 2 or more defects were selected. An individualized film holder was used to take standardized radiographs of the 43 defects, at baseline and after 24 months. Images were digitized and used to measure the distances from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest (AC), CEJ to the bottom of the defect (BD) and infrabony defect angle. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS for Windows (version 5.2). Paired samples t test was used to compare test and control groups and to evaluate changes within each group. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05%. RESULTS: After 24 months, a significant crestal bone loss was observed for EMD (1.01 mm; p = 0.049) but not for OFD (0.14 mm; p = 0.622). However, no differences were detected between groups (p = 0.37). Reduction of the bone defect depth was significant for OFD (0.70 mm; p = 0.005) but not for EMD (0.04 mm; p = 0.86), while no differences were detected between them (p = 0.87). Both EMD (0.69°; p = 0.82) and OFD (5.71°; p = 0.24) showed an improvement in defect angle measurements but no significant differences were observed after 24 months or between the groups (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Linear radiographic analysis was not able to demonstrate superiority of EMD treated infrabony defects when compared to ODF after 24 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02195765. Registered 17 July 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4266965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42669652014-12-16 Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer Chambrone, Daniela Pasin, Ivan Munhoz Conde, Marina Clemente Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes de Lima, Luiz Antônio Pugliesi Alves BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: This split-mouth, double-blind randomized controlled trial evaluated radiographic changes in infrabony defects treated with open flap debridement (OFD) or OFD associated with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) after a 24–month follow-up. The radiographic distance from the CEJ to the bottom of the defect (BD) was considered the primary outcome. CEJ-BC and defect angle were secondary outcomes. METHODS: Ten patients presenting 2 or more defects were selected. An individualized film holder was used to take standardized radiographs of the 43 defects, at baseline and after 24 months. Images were digitized and used to measure the distances from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest (AC), CEJ to the bottom of the defect (BD) and infrabony defect angle. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS for Windows (version 5.2). Paired samples t test was used to compare test and control groups and to evaluate changes within each group. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05%. RESULTS: After 24 months, a significant crestal bone loss was observed for EMD (1.01 mm; p = 0.049) but not for OFD (0.14 mm; p = 0.622). However, no differences were detected between groups (p = 0.37). Reduction of the bone defect depth was significant for OFD (0.70 mm; p = 0.005) but not for EMD (0.04 mm; p = 0.86), while no differences were detected between them (p = 0.87). Both EMD (0.69°; p = 0.82) and OFD (5.71°; p = 0.24) showed an improvement in defect angle measurements but no significant differences were observed after 24 months or between the groups (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Linear radiographic analysis was not able to demonstrate superiority of EMD treated infrabony defects when compared to ODF after 24 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02195765. Registered 17 July 2014. BioMed Central 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4266965/ /pubmed/25475143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-149 Text en © Ragghianti Zangrando et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
Chambrone, Daniela
Pasin, Ivan Munhoz
Conde, Marina Clemente
Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes
de Lima, Luiz Antônio Pugliesi Alves
Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
title Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
title_full Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
title_fullStr Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
title_short Two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
title_sort two-year randomized clinical trial of enamel matrix derivative treated infrabony defects: radiographic analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25475143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-149
work_keys_str_mv AT ragghiantizangrandomarianaschutzer twoyearrandomizedclinicaltrialofenamelmatrixderivativetreatedinfrabonydefectsradiographicanalysis
AT chambronedaniela twoyearrandomizedclinicaltrialofenamelmatrixderivativetreatedinfrabonydefectsradiographicanalysis
AT pasinivanmunhoz twoyearrandomizedclinicaltrialofenamelmatrixderivativetreatedinfrabonydefectsradiographicanalysis
AT condemarinaclemente twoyearrandomizedclinicaltrialofenamelmatrixderivativetreatedinfrabonydefectsradiographicanalysis
AT pannuticlaudiomendes twoyearrandomizedclinicaltrialofenamelmatrixderivativetreatedinfrabonydefectsradiographicanalysis
AT delimaluizantoniopugliesialves twoyearrandomizedclinicaltrialofenamelmatrixderivativetreatedinfrabonydefectsradiographicanalysis