Cargando…

Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening

OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences of patients, health professionals and screeners; their interactions with and understandings of diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS); and how these influence uptake. DESIGN: Purposive, qualitative design using multiperspectival, semistructured interviews and them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hipwell, A E, Sturt, J, Lindenmeyer, A, Stratton, I, Gadsby, R, O'Hare, P, Scanlon, P H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25510885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005498
_version_ 1782349096620654592
author Hipwell, A E
Sturt, J
Lindenmeyer, A
Stratton, I
Gadsby, R
O'Hare, P
Scanlon, P H
author_facet Hipwell, A E
Sturt, J
Lindenmeyer, A
Stratton, I
Gadsby, R
O'Hare, P
Scanlon, P H
author_sort Hipwell, A E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences of patients, health professionals and screeners; their interactions with and understandings of diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS); and how these influence uptake. DESIGN: Purposive, qualitative design using multiperspectival, semistructured interviews and thematic analysis. SETTING: Three UK Screening Programme regions with different service-delivery modes, minority ethnic and deprivation levels across rural, urban and inner-city areas, in general practitioner practices and patients’ homes. PARTICIPANTS: 62 including 38 patients (22 regular-screening attenders, 16 non-regular attenders) and 24 professionals (15 primary care professionals and 9 screeners). RESULTS: Antecedents to attendance included knowledge about diabetic retinopathy and screening; antecedents to non-attendance included psychological, pragmatic and social factors. Confusion between photographs taken at routine eye tests and DRS photographs was identified. The differing regional invitation methods and screening locations were discussed, with convenience and transport safety being over-riding considerations for patients. Some patients mentioned significant pain and visual disturbance from mydriasis drops as a deterrent to attendance. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the first study to consider multiperspectival experiential accounts, we identified that proactive coordination of care involving patients, primary care and screening programmes, prior to, during and after screening is required. Multiple factors, prior to, during and after screening, are involved in the attendance and non-attendance for DRS. Further research is needed to establish whether patient self-management educational interventions and the pharmacological reformulation of shorter acting mydriasis drops, may improve uptake of DRS. This might, in turn, reduce preventable vision loss and its associated costs to individuals and their families, and to health and social care providers, reducing current inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4267079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42670792014-12-18 Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening Hipwell, A E Sturt, J Lindenmeyer, A Stratton, I Gadsby, R O'Hare, P Scanlon, P H BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences of patients, health professionals and screeners; their interactions with and understandings of diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS); and how these influence uptake. DESIGN: Purposive, qualitative design using multiperspectival, semistructured interviews and thematic analysis. SETTING: Three UK Screening Programme regions with different service-delivery modes, minority ethnic and deprivation levels across rural, urban and inner-city areas, in general practitioner practices and patients’ homes. PARTICIPANTS: 62 including 38 patients (22 regular-screening attenders, 16 non-regular attenders) and 24 professionals (15 primary care professionals and 9 screeners). RESULTS: Antecedents to attendance included knowledge about diabetic retinopathy and screening; antecedents to non-attendance included psychological, pragmatic and social factors. Confusion between photographs taken at routine eye tests and DRS photographs was identified. The differing regional invitation methods and screening locations were discussed, with convenience and transport safety being over-riding considerations for patients. Some patients mentioned significant pain and visual disturbance from mydriasis drops as a deterrent to attendance. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the first study to consider multiperspectival experiential accounts, we identified that proactive coordination of care involving patients, primary care and screening programmes, prior to, during and after screening is required. Multiple factors, prior to, during and after screening, are involved in the attendance and non-attendance for DRS. Further research is needed to establish whether patient self-management educational interventions and the pharmacological reformulation of shorter acting mydriasis drops, may improve uptake of DRS. This might, in turn, reduce preventable vision loss and its associated costs to individuals and their families, and to health and social care providers, reducing current inequalities. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4267079/ /pubmed/25510885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005498 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Hipwell, A E
Sturt, J
Lindenmeyer, A
Stratton, I
Gadsby, R
O'Hare, P
Scanlon, P H
Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
title Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
title_full Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
title_fullStr Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
title_short Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
title_sort attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients’ experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25510885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005498
work_keys_str_mv AT hipwellae attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening
AT sturtj attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening
AT lindenmeyera attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening
AT strattoni attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening
AT gadsbyr attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening
AT oharep attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening
AT scanlonph attitudesaccessandanguishaqualitativeinterviewstudyofstaffandpatientsexperiencesofdiabeticretinopathyscreening