Cargando…

Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients

Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toyoda, Daisuke, Shinoda, Shigeo, Kotake, Yoshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-2-23
_version_ 1782349164545310720
author Toyoda, Daisuke
Shinoda, Shigeo
Kotake, Yoshifumi
author_facet Toyoda, Daisuke
Shinoda, Shigeo
Kotake, Yoshifumi
author_sort Toyoda, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitial fluid accumulation, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is most frequently used for perioperative setting. Nevertheless, application of HES solution is relatively limited due to its side effects including renal toxicity and coagulopathy. Since prolonged presence of large HES molecule is responsible for these side effects, rapidly degradable HES solution with low degree of substitution (tetrastarch) supposedly has less potential for negative effects. Thus, tetrastarch may be more frequently used in the ICU setting. However, several large-scale randomized trials reported that administration of tetrastarch solution to the patients with severe sepsis has negative effects on mortality and renal function. These results triggered further debate and regulatory responses around the world. This narrative review intended to describe the currently available evidence about the advantages and disadvantages of tetrastarch in the ICU setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4267598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42675982014-12-17 Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients Toyoda, Daisuke Shinoda, Shigeo Kotake, Yoshifumi J Intensive Care Review Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitial fluid accumulation, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is most frequently used for perioperative setting. Nevertheless, application of HES solution is relatively limited due to its side effects including renal toxicity and coagulopathy. Since prolonged presence of large HES molecule is responsible for these side effects, rapidly degradable HES solution with low degree of substitution (tetrastarch) supposedly has less potential for negative effects. Thus, tetrastarch may be more frequently used in the ICU setting. However, several large-scale randomized trials reported that administration of tetrastarch solution to the patients with severe sepsis has negative effects on mortality and renal function. These results triggered further debate and regulatory responses around the world. This narrative review intended to describe the currently available evidence about the advantages and disadvantages of tetrastarch in the ICU setting. BioMed Central 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4267598/ /pubmed/25520835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-2-23 Text en © Toyoda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Toyoda, Daisuke
Shinoda, Shigeo
Kotake, Yoshifumi
Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
title Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
title_full Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
title_fullStr Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
title_short Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
title_sort pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-2-23
work_keys_str_mv AT toyodadaisuke prosandconsoftetrastarchsolutionforcriticallyillpatients
AT shinodashigeo prosandconsoftetrastarchsolutionforcriticallyillpatients
AT kotakeyoshifumi prosandconsoftetrastarchsolutionforcriticallyillpatients