Cargando…
Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitia...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-2-23 |
_version_ | 1782349164545310720 |
---|---|
author | Toyoda, Daisuke Shinoda, Shigeo Kotake, Yoshifumi |
author_facet | Toyoda, Daisuke Shinoda, Shigeo Kotake, Yoshifumi |
author_sort | Toyoda, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitial fluid accumulation, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is most frequently used for perioperative setting. Nevertheless, application of HES solution is relatively limited due to its side effects including renal toxicity and coagulopathy. Since prolonged presence of large HES molecule is responsible for these side effects, rapidly degradable HES solution with low degree of substitution (tetrastarch) supposedly has less potential for negative effects. Thus, tetrastarch may be more frequently used in the ICU setting. However, several large-scale randomized trials reported that administration of tetrastarch solution to the patients with severe sepsis has negative effects on mortality and renal function. These results triggered further debate and regulatory responses around the world. This narrative review intended to describe the currently available evidence about the advantages and disadvantages of tetrastarch in the ICU setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4267598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42675982014-12-17 Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients Toyoda, Daisuke Shinoda, Shigeo Kotake, Yoshifumi J Intensive Care Review Proper fluid management is crucial for the management of critically ill patients. However, there is a continuing debate about the choice of the fluid, i.e., crystalloid vs. colloid. Colloid solution is theoretically advantageous to the crystalloid because of larger volume effect and less interstitial fluid accumulation, and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is most frequently used for perioperative setting. Nevertheless, application of HES solution is relatively limited due to its side effects including renal toxicity and coagulopathy. Since prolonged presence of large HES molecule is responsible for these side effects, rapidly degradable HES solution with low degree of substitution (tetrastarch) supposedly has less potential for negative effects. Thus, tetrastarch may be more frequently used in the ICU setting. However, several large-scale randomized trials reported that administration of tetrastarch solution to the patients with severe sepsis has negative effects on mortality and renal function. These results triggered further debate and regulatory responses around the world. This narrative review intended to describe the currently available evidence about the advantages and disadvantages of tetrastarch in the ICU setting. BioMed Central 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4267598/ /pubmed/25520835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-2-23 Text en © Toyoda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Toyoda, Daisuke Shinoda, Shigeo Kotake, Yoshifumi Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
title | Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
title_full | Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
title_fullStr | Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
title_short | Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
title_sort | pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-0492-2-23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toyodadaisuke prosandconsoftetrastarchsolutionforcriticallyillpatients AT shinodashigeo prosandconsoftetrastarchsolutionforcriticallyillpatients AT kotakeyoshifumi prosandconsoftetrastarchsolutionforcriticallyillpatients |