Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma

INTRODUCTION: Earlier reports of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for adrenal myelolipoma are limited. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Between June 2000 and September 2012, we performed right adrenal resections using LA and open adrenalectomy (OA) in patients with myelolipoma (n = 3 and n = 3, respectively). T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamashita, Suguru, Ito, Kei, Furushima, Kaoru, Fukushima, Junichi, Kameyama, Shuji, Harihara, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.04.001
_version_ 1782349239214407680
author Yamashita, Suguru
Ito, Kei
Furushima, Kaoru
Fukushima, Junichi
Kameyama, Shuji
Harihara, Yasushi
author_facet Yamashita, Suguru
Ito, Kei
Furushima, Kaoru
Fukushima, Junichi
Kameyama, Shuji
Harihara, Yasushi
author_sort Yamashita, Suguru
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Earlier reports of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for adrenal myelolipoma are limited. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Between June 2000 and September 2012, we performed right adrenal resections using LA and open adrenalectomy (OA) in patients with myelolipoma (n = 3 and n = 3, respectively). Then, we evaluated patients' background characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes for both groups. The median maximum diameters of tumors were 3.5 (3.0–4.4) cm and 7.1 (7.0–9.5) cm for the LA and OA groups, respectively. The median durations of the operation were 152 (117–188) min and 218 (153–230) min, and the median blood loss volumes were 50 (20–160) mL and 290 (62–1237) mL in the LA and OA groups, respectively. The median postoperative lengths of hospital stay were 4 (4–4) days and 11 (11–13) days for the LA and OA groups, respectively. Conversion from LA to an open approach during surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Additionally, perioperative morbidity and mortality were not observed. DISCUSSION: The limitation of this study is its methodological design; it is a case series and not a matched-control study, which would be difficult to conduct owing to the rare nature of adrenal myelolipoma. However, we esteem that LA will become widespread in the future because it is feasible, cosmetic, and less invasive. CONCLUSION: LA was a safe, feasible, and effective approach to adrenal myelolipoma, assisted by advancement in preoperative imaging diagnostic techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4268474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42684742015-01-07 Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma Yamashita, Suguru Ito, Kei Furushima, Kaoru Fukushima, Junichi Kameyama, Shuji Harihara, Yasushi Ann Med Surg (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: Earlier reports of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for adrenal myelolipoma are limited. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Between June 2000 and September 2012, we performed right adrenal resections using LA and open adrenalectomy (OA) in patients with myelolipoma (n = 3 and n = 3, respectively). Then, we evaluated patients' background characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes for both groups. The median maximum diameters of tumors were 3.5 (3.0–4.4) cm and 7.1 (7.0–9.5) cm for the LA and OA groups, respectively. The median durations of the operation were 152 (117–188) min and 218 (153–230) min, and the median blood loss volumes were 50 (20–160) mL and 290 (62–1237) mL in the LA and OA groups, respectively. The median postoperative lengths of hospital stay were 4 (4–4) days and 11 (11–13) days for the LA and OA groups, respectively. Conversion from LA to an open approach during surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Additionally, perioperative morbidity and mortality were not observed. DISCUSSION: The limitation of this study is its methodological design; it is a case series and not a matched-control study, which would be difficult to conduct owing to the rare nature of adrenal myelolipoma. However, we esteem that LA will become widespread in the future because it is feasible, cosmetic, and less invasive. CONCLUSION: LA was a safe, feasible, and effective approach to adrenal myelolipoma, assisted by advancement in preoperative imaging diagnostic techniques. Elsevier 2014-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4268474/ /pubmed/25568783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.04.001 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yamashita, Suguru
Ito, Kei
Furushima, Kaoru
Fukushima, Junichi
Kameyama, Shuji
Harihara, Yasushi
Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
title Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
title_full Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
title_short Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
title_sort laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal myelolipoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2014.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT yamashitasuguru laparoscopicversusopenadrenalectomyforadrenalmyelolipoma
AT itokei laparoscopicversusopenadrenalectomyforadrenalmyelolipoma
AT furushimakaoru laparoscopicversusopenadrenalectomyforadrenalmyelolipoma
AT fukushimajunichi laparoscopicversusopenadrenalectomyforadrenalmyelolipoma
AT kameyamashuji laparoscopicversusopenadrenalectomyforadrenalmyelolipoma
AT hariharayasushi laparoscopicversusopenadrenalectomyforadrenalmyelolipoma