Cargando…
Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
OVERVIEW: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538514 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.144056 |
_version_ | 1782349246971772928 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Babita Kohli, Santvana Farooque, Kamran Jalwal, Gopal Gupta, Deepak Sinha, Sumit Chandralekha, |
author_facet | Gupta, Babita Kohli, Santvana Farooque, Kamran Jalwal, Gopal Gupta, Deepak Sinha, Sumit Chandralekha, |
author_sort | Gupta, Babita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OVERVIEW: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. This randomized controlled study was performed to compare two methods of airway anesthesia, namely ultrasonic nebulization of local anesthetic and performance of airway blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 adult patients with cervical spine injury were randomly allocated into two groups. Group L received airway anesthesia through ultrasonic nebulization of 10 ml of 4% lignocaine and Group NB received airway blocks (bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal) each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine and viscous lignocaine gargles. FOB guided orotracheal intubation was then performed. Hemodynamic variables at baseline and during the procedure, patient recall, vocal cord visibility, ease of intubation, coughing/gagging episodes, and signs of lignocaine toxicity were noted. RESULTS: The observations did not reveal any significant differences in demographics or hemodynamic parameters at any time during the study. However, the time taken for intubation was significantly lower in Group NB as compared with the Group L. Group L had an increased number of coughing/gagging episodes as compared with Group NB. Vocal cord visibility and ease of intubation were better in patients who received airway blocks and hence the amount of supplemental lignocaine used was less in this group. Overall patient comfort was better in Group NB with fewer incidences of unpleasant recalls as compared with Group L. CONCLUSION: Upper airway blocks provide better quality of anesthesia than lignocaine nebulization as assessed by patient recall of procedure, coughing/gagging episodes, ease of intubation, vocal cord visibility, and time taken to intubate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4268521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42685212014-12-23 Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer Gupta, Babita Kohli, Santvana Farooque, Kamran Jalwal, Gopal Gupta, Deepak Sinha, Sumit Chandralekha, Saudi J Anaesth Original Article OVERVIEW: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. This randomized controlled study was performed to compare two methods of airway anesthesia, namely ultrasonic nebulization of local anesthetic and performance of airway blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 adult patients with cervical spine injury were randomly allocated into two groups. Group L received airway anesthesia through ultrasonic nebulization of 10 ml of 4% lignocaine and Group NB received airway blocks (bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal) each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine and viscous lignocaine gargles. FOB guided orotracheal intubation was then performed. Hemodynamic variables at baseline and during the procedure, patient recall, vocal cord visibility, ease of intubation, coughing/gagging episodes, and signs of lignocaine toxicity were noted. RESULTS: The observations did not reveal any significant differences in demographics or hemodynamic parameters at any time during the study. However, the time taken for intubation was significantly lower in Group NB as compared with the Group L. Group L had an increased number of coughing/gagging episodes as compared with Group NB. Vocal cord visibility and ease of intubation were better in patients who received airway blocks and hence the amount of supplemental lignocaine used was less in this group. Overall patient comfort was better in Group NB with fewer incidences of unpleasant recalls as compared with Group L. CONCLUSION: Upper airway blocks provide better quality of anesthesia than lignocaine nebulization as assessed by patient recall of procedure, coughing/gagging episodes, ease of intubation, vocal cord visibility, and time taken to intubate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4268521/ /pubmed/25538514 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.144056 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Babita Kohli, Santvana Farooque, Kamran Jalwal, Gopal Gupta, Deepak Sinha, Sumit Chandralekha, Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
title | Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
title_full | Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
title_fullStr | Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
title_full_unstemmed | Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
title_short | Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
title_sort | topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538514 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.144056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptababita topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer AT kohlisantvana topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer AT farooquekamran topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer AT jalwalgopal topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer AT guptadeepak topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer AT sinhasumit topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer AT chandralekha topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer |