Cargando…

Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer

OVERVIEW: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Babita, Kohli, Santvana, Farooque, Kamran, Jalwal, Gopal, Gupta, Deepak, Sinha, Sumit, Chandralekha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538514
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.144056
_version_ 1782349246971772928
author Gupta, Babita
Kohli, Santvana
Farooque, Kamran
Jalwal, Gopal
Gupta, Deepak
Sinha, Sumit
Chandralekha,
author_facet Gupta, Babita
Kohli, Santvana
Farooque, Kamran
Jalwal, Gopal
Gupta, Deepak
Sinha, Sumit
Chandralekha,
author_sort Gupta, Babita
collection PubMed
description OVERVIEW: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. This randomized controlled study was performed to compare two methods of airway anesthesia, namely ultrasonic nebulization of local anesthetic and performance of airway blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 adult patients with cervical spine injury were randomly allocated into two groups. Group L received airway anesthesia through ultrasonic nebulization of 10 ml of 4% lignocaine and Group NB received airway blocks (bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal) each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine and viscous lignocaine gargles. FOB guided orotracheal intubation was then performed. Hemodynamic variables at baseline and during the procedure, patient recall, vocal cord visibility, ease of intubation, coughing/gagging episodes, and signs of lignocaine toxicity were noted. RESULTS: The observations did not reveal any significant differences in demographics or hemodynamic parameters at any time during the study. However, the time taken for intubation was significantly lower in Group NB as compared with the Group L. Group L had an increased number of coughing/gagging episodes as compared with Group NB. Vocal cord visibility and ease of intubation were better in patients who received airway blocks and hence the amount of supplemental lignocaine used was less in this group. Overall patient comfort was better in Group NB with fewer incidences of unpleasant recalls as compared with Group L. CONCLUSION: Upper airway blocks provide better quality of anesthesia than lignocaine nebulization as assessed by patient recall of procedure, coughing/gagging episodes, ease of intubation, vocal cord visibility, and time taken to intubate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4268521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42685212014-12-23 Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer Gupta, Babita Kohli, Santvana Farooque, Kamran Jalwal, Gopal Gupta, Deepak Sinha, Sumit Chandralekha, Saudi J Anaesth Original Article OVERVIEW: Awake fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) guided intubation is the gold standard of airway management in patients with cervical spine injury. It is essential to sufficiently anesthetize the upper airway before the performance of awake FOB guided intubation in order to ensure patient comfort and cooperation. This randomized controlled study was performed to compare two methods of airway anesthesia, namely ultrasonic nebulization of local anesthetic and performance of airway blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 adult patients with cervical spine injury were randomly allocated into two groups. Group L received airway anesthesia through ultrasonic nebulization of 10 ml of 4% lignocaine and Group NB received airway blocks (bilateral superior laryngeal and transtracheal recurrent laryngeal) each with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine and viscous lignocaine gargles. FOB guided orotracheal intubation was then performed. Hemodynamic variables at baseline and during the procedure, patient recall, vocal cord visibility, ease of intubation, coughing/gagging episodes, and signs of lignocaine toxicity were noted. RESULTS: The observations did not reveal any significant differences in demographics or hemodynamic parameters at any time during the study. However, the time taken for intubation was significantly lower in Group NB as compared with the Group L. Group L had an increased number of coughing/gagging episodes as compared with Group NB. Vocal cord visibility and ease of intubation were better in patients who received airway blocks and hence the amount of supplemental lignocaine used was less in this group. Overall patient comfort was better in Group NB with fewer incidences of unpleasant recalls as compared with Group L. CONCLUSION: Upper airway blocks provide better quality of anesthesia than lignocaine nebulization as assessed by patient recall of procedure, coughing/gagging episodes, ease of intubation, vocal cord visibility, and time taken to intubate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4268521/ /pubmed/25538514 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.144056 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Babita
Kohli, Santvana
Farooque, Kamran
Jalwal, Gopal
Gupta, Deepak
Sinha, Sumit
Chandralekha,
Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
title Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
title_full Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
title_fullStr Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
title_full_unstemmed Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
title_short Topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: Comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
title_sort topical airway anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation: comparison between airway nerve blocks and nebulized lignocaine by ultrasonic nebulizer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538514
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.144056
work_keys_str_mv AT guptababita topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer
AT kohlisantvana topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer
AT farooquekamran topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer
AT jalwalgopal topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer
AT guptadeepak topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer
AT sinhasumit topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer
AT chandralekha topicalairwayanesthesiaforawakefiberopticintubationcomparisonbetweenairwaynerveblocksandnebulizedlignocainebyultrasonicnebulizer