Cargando…

Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is similar among women at risk of either sporadic or BRCA1/2-related breast cancer. It has been suggested that digitized mammographic images contain computer-extractable information within the parenchymal pattern, which may contribute to distinguishing between BRCA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gierach, Gretchen L, Li, Hui, Loud, Jennifer T, Greene, Mark H, Chow, Catherine K, Lan, Li, Prindiville, Sheila A, Eng-Wong, Jennifer, Soballe, Peter W, Giambartolomei, Claudia, Mai, Phuong L, Galbo, Claudia E, Nichols, Kathryn, Calzone, Kathleen A, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I, Gail, Mitchell H, Giger, Maryellen L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8
_version_ 1782349268616478720
author Gierach, Gretchen L
Li, Hui
Loud, Jennifer T
Greene, Mark H
Chow, Catherine K
Lan, Li
Prindiville, Sheila A
Eng-Wong, Jennifer
Soballe, Peter W
Giambartolomei, Claudia
Mai, Phuong L
Galbo, Claudia E
Nichols, Kathryn
Calzone, Kathleen A
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I
Gail, Mitchell H
Giger, Maryellen L
author_facet Gierach, Gretchen L
Li, Hui
Loud, Jennifer T
Greene, Mark H
Chow, Catherine K
Lan, Li
Prindiville, Sheila A
Eng-Wong, Jennifer
Soballe, Peter W
Giambartolomei, Claudia
Mai, Phuong L
Galbo, Claudia E
Nichols, Kathryn
Calzone, Kathleen A
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I
Gail, Mitchell H
Giger, Maryellen L
author_sort Gierach, Gretchen L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is similar among women at risk of either sporadic or BRCA1/2-related breast cancer. It has been suggested that digitized mammographic images contain computer-extractable information within the parenchymal pattern, which may contribute to distinguishing between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. METHODS: We compared mammographic texture pattern features in digitized mammograms from women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 137) versus non-carriers (n = 100). Subjects were stratified into training (107 carriers, 70 non-carriers) and testing (30 carriers, 30 non-carriers) datasets. Masked to mutation status, texture features were extracted from a retro-areolar region-of-interest in each subject’s digitized mammogram. Stepwise linear regression analysis of the training dataset identified variables to be included in a radiographic texture analysis (RTA) classifier model aimed at distinguishing BRCA1/2 carriers from non-carriers. The selected features were combined using a Bayesian Artificial Neural Network (BANN) algorithm, which produced a probability score rating the likelihood of each subject’s belonging to the mutation-positive group. These probability scores were evaluated in the independent testing dataset to determine whether their distribution differed between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to estimate the model’s discriminatory capacity. RESULTS: In the testing dataset, a one standard deviation (SD) increase in the probability score from the BANN-trained classifier was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of predicting BRCA1/2 mutation status: unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59, 2.51, P = 0.02; age-adjusted OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.53, 2.42, P = 0.03. Additional adjustment for percent mammographic density did little to change the OR. The area under the curve for the BANN-trained classifier to distinguish between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers was 0.68 for features alone and 0.72 for the features plus percent mammographic density. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, unlike percent mammographic density, computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features are associated with carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. Although still at an early stage, our novel RTA classifier has potential for improving mammographic image interpretation by permitting real-time risk stratification among women undergoing screening mammography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4268674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42686742014-12-17 Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study Gierach, Gretchen L Li, Hui Loud, Jennifer T Greene, Mark H Chow, Catherine K Lan, Li Prindiville, Sheila A Eng-Wong, Jennifer Soballe, Peter W Giambartolomei, Claudia Mai, Phuong L Galbo, Claudia E Nichols, Kathryn Calzone, Kathleen A Olopade, Olufunmilayo I Gail, Mitchell H Giger, Maryellen L Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is similar among women at risk of either sporadic or BRCA1/2-related breast cancer. It has been suggested that digitized mammographic images contain computer-extractable information within the parenchymal pattern, which may contribute to distinguishing between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. METHODS: We compared mammographic texture pattern features in digitized mammograms from women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 137) versus non-carriers (n = 100). Subjects were stratified into training (107 carriers, 70 non-carriers) and testing (30 carriers, 30 non-carriers) datasets. Masked to mutation status, texture features were extracted from a retro-areolar region-of-interest in each subject’s digitized mammogram. Stepwise linear regression analysis of the training dataset identified variables to be included in a radiographic texture analysis (RTA) classifier model aimed at distinguishing BRCA1/2 carriers from non-carriers. The selected features were combined using a Bayesian Artificial Neural Network (BANN) algorithm, which produced a probability score rating the likelihood of each subject’s belonging to the mutation-positive group. These probability scores were evaluated in the independent testing dataset to determine whether their distribution differed between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to estimate the model’s discriminatory capacity. RESULTS: In the testing dataset, a one standard deviation (SD) increase in the probability score from the BANN-trained classifier was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of predicting BRCA1/2 mutation status: unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59, 2.51, P = 0.02; age-adjusted OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.53, 2.42, P = 0.03. Additional adjustment for percent mammographic density did little to change the OR. The area under the curve for the BANN-trained classifier to distinguish between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers was 0.68 for features alone and 0.72 for the features plus percent mammographic density. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, unlike percent mammographic density, computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features are associated with carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. Although still at an early stage, our novel RTA classifier has potential for improving mammographic image interpretation by permitting real-time risk stratification among women undergoing screening mammography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-23 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4268674/ /pubmed/25159706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8 Text en © Gierach et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gierach, Gretchen L
Li, Hui
Loud, Jennifer T
Greene, Mark H
Chow, Catherine K
Lan, Li
Prindiville, Sheila A
Eng-Wong, Jennifer
Soballe, Peter W
Giambartolomei, Claudia
Mai, Phuong L
Galbo, Claudia E
Nichols, Kathryn
Calzone, Kathleen A
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I
Gail, Mitchell H
Giger, Maryellen L
Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
title Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
title_full Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
title_short Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
title_sort relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and brca1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gierachgretchenl relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT lihui relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT loudjennifert relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT greenemarkh relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT chowcatherinek relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT lanli relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT prindivillesheilaa relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT engwongjennifer relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT soballepeterw relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT giambartolomeiclaudia relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT maiphuongl relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT galboclaudiae relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT nicholskathryn relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT calzonekathleena relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT olopadeolufunmilayoi relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT gailmitchellh relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT gigermaryellenl relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy