Cargando…
Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study
INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is similar among women at risk of either sporadic or BRCA1/2-related breast cancer. It has been suggested that digitized mammographic images contain computer-extractable information within the parenchymal pattern, which may contribute to distinguishing between BRCA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8 |
_version_ | 1782349268616478720 |
---|---|
author | Gierach, Gretchen L Li, Hui Loud, Jennifer T Greene, Mark H Chow, Catherine K Lan, Li Prindiville, Sheila A Eng-Wong, Jennifer Soballe, Peter W Giambartolomei, Claudia Mai, Phuong L Galbo, Claudia E Nichols, Kathryn Calzone, Kathleen A Olopade, Olufunmilayo I Gail, Mitchell H Giger, Maryellen L |
author_facet | Gierach, Gretchen L Li, Hui Loud, Jennifer T Greene, Mark H Chow, Catherine K Lan, Li Prindiville, Sheila A Eng-Wong, Jennifer Soballe, Peter W Giambartolomei, Claudia Mai, Phuong L Galbo, Claudia E Nichols, Kathryn Calzone, Kathleen A Olopade, Olufunmilayo I Gail, Mitchell H Giger, Maryellen L |
author_sort | Gierach, Gretchen L |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is similar among women at risk of either sporadic or BRCA1/2-related breast cancer. It has been suggested that digitized mammographic images contain computer-extractable information within the parenchymal pattern, which may contribute to distinguishing between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. METHODS: We compared mammographic texture pattern features in digitized mammograms from women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 137) versus non-carriers (n = 100). Subjects were stratified into training (107 carriers, 70 non-carriers) and testing (30 carriers, 30 non-carriers) datasets. Masked to mutation status, texture features were extracted from a retro-areolar region-of-interest in each subject’s digitized mammogram. Stepwise linear regression analysis of the training dataset identified variables to be included in a radiographic texture analysis (RTA) classifier model aimed at distinguishing BRCA1/2 carriers from non-carriers. The selected features were combined using a Bayesian Artificial Neural Network (BANN) algorithm, which produced a probability score rating the likelihood of each subject’s belonging to the mutation-positive group. These probability scores were evaluated in the independent testing dataset to determine whether their distribution differed between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to estimate the model’s discriminatory capacity. RESULTS: In the testing dataset, a one standard deviation (SD) increase in the probability score from the BANN-trained classifier was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of predicting BRCA1/2 mutation status: unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59, 2.51, P = 0.02; age-adjusted OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.53, 2.42, P = 0.03. Additional adjustment for percent mammographic density did little to change the OR. The area under the curve for the BANN-trained classifier to distinguish between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers was 0.68 for features alone and 0.72 for the features plus percent mammographic density. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, unlike percent mammographic density, computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features are associated with carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. Although still at an early stage, our novel RTA classifier has potential for improving mammographic image interpretation by permitting real-time risk stratification among women undergoing screening mammography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4268674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42686742014-12-17 Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study Gierach, Gretchen L Li, Hui Loud, Jennifer T Greene, Mark H Chow, Catherine K Lan, Li Prindiville, Sheila A Eng-Wong, Jennifer Soballe, Peter W Giambartolomei, Claudia Mai, Phuong L Galbo, Claudia E Nichols, Kathryn Calzone, Kathleen A Olopade, Olufunmilayo I Gail, Mitchell H Giger, Maryellen L Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Mammographic density is similar among women at risk of either sporadic or BRCA1/2-related breast cancer. It has been suggested that digitized mammographic images contain computer-extractable information within the parenchymal pattern, which may contribute to distinguishing between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. METHODS: We compared mammographic texture pattern features in digitized mammograms from women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 137) versus non-carriers (n = 100). Subjects were stratified into training (107 carriers, 70 non-carriers) and testing (30 carriers, 30 non-carriers) datasets. Masked to mutation status, texture features were extracted from a retro-areolar region-of-interest in each subject’s digitized mammogram. Stepwise linear regression analysis of the training dataset identified variables to be included in a radiographic texture analysis (RTA) classifier model aimed at distinguishing BRCA1/2 carriers from non-carriers. The selected features were combined using a Bayesian Artificial Neural Network (BANN) algorithm, which produced a probability score rating the likelihood of each subject’s belonging to the mutation-positive group. These probability scores were evaluated in the independent testing dataset to determine whether their distribution differed between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to estimate the model’s discriminatory capacity. RESULTS: In the testing dataset, a one standard deviation (SD) increase in the probability score from the BANN-trained classifier was associated with a two-fold increase in the odds of predicting BRCA1/2 mutation status: unadjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59, 2.51, P = 0.02; age-adjusted OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.53, 2.42, P = 0.03. Additional adjustment for percent mammographic density did little to change the OR. The area under the curve for the BANN-trained classifier to distinguish between BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers was 0.68 for features alone and 0.72 for the features plus percent mammographic density. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, unlike percent mammographic density, computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features are associated with carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. Although still at an early stage, our novel RTA classifier has potential for improving mammographic image interpretation by permitting real-time risk stratification among women undergoing screening mammography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-23 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4268674/ /pubmed/25159706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8 Text en © Gierach et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gierach, Gretchen L Li, Hui Loud, Jennifer T Greene, Mark H Chow, Catherine K Lan, Li Prindiville, Sheila A Eng-Wong, Jennifer Soballe, Peter W Giambartolomei, Claudia Mai, Phuong L Galbo, Claudia E Nichols, Kathryn Calzone, Kathleen A Olopade, Olufunmilayo I Gail, Mitchell H Giger, Maryellen L Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
title | Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and brca1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25159706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0424-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gierachgretchenl relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT lihui relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT loudjennifert relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT greenemarkh relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT chowcatherinek relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT lanli relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT prindivillesheilaa relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT engwongjennifer relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT soballepeterw relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT giambartolomeiclaudia relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT maiphuongl relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT galboclaudiae relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT nicholskathryn relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT calzonekathleena relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT olopadeolufunmilayoi relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT gailmitchellh relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy AT gigermaryellenl relationshipsbetweencomputerextractedmammographictexturepatternfeaturesandbrca12mutationstatusacrosssectionalstudy |