Cargando…

Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema

BACKGROUND: In pulsed-dose rate prostate brachytherapy the dose is delivered during 48 hours after implantation, making the treatment sensitive to oedematic effects possibly affecting dose delivery. The aim was to study changes in prostate volume during treatment by analysing catheter configurations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinkla, Anna M, Pieters, Bradley R, Koedooder, Kees, van Wieringen, Niek, van der Laarse, Rob, Bel, Arjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25497373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0272-9
_version_ 1782349292338413568
author Dinkla, Anna M
Pieters, Bradley R
Koedooder, Kees
van Wieringen, Niek
van der Laarse, Rob
Bel, Arjan
author_facet Dinkla, Anna M
Pieters, Bradley R
Koedooder, Kees
van Wieringen, Niek
van der Laarse, Rob
Bel, Arjan
author_sort Dinkla, Anna M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In pulsed-dose rate prostate brachytherapy the dose is delivered during 48 hours after implantation, making the treatment sensitive to oedematic effects possibly affecting dose delivery. The aim was to study changes in prostate volume during treatment by analysing catheter configurations on three subsequent scans. METHODS: Prostate expansion was determined for 19 patients from the change in spatial distribution of the implanted catheters, using three CT-scans: a planning CT (CT1) and two CTs after 24 and 48 hours (CT2, CT3). An additional 4 patients only received one repeat CT (after 24 hours). The mean radial distance (MRD) of all dwell positions to the geometric centre of all dwell positions used was calculated to evaluate volume changes. From three implanted markers changes in inter-marker distances were assessed. The relative shifts of all dwell positions were determined using catheter- and marker-based registrations. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to compare the results from the different time points. RESULTS: The MRDs measured on the two repeat CTs were significantly different from CT1. The mean prostate volume change derived from the difference in MRD was +4.3% (range −9.3% to +15.6%) for CT1-CT2 (p < .05) and +4.4% (range −7.5% to +16.3%) for CT1-CT3 (p < .05). These values represented a mean increase of 1.2 cm(3) in the first 24 hours and 1.5 cm(3) in the subsequent 24 hours. There was no clear sign of prostate expansion from the change in inter-marker distance (CT1-CT2: 0.2 ± 1.8 mm; CT1-CT3: 0.6 ± 2.2 mm). Catheter configuration remained stable; shifts in catheter positions were largest in the C-C direction: 0 ± 1.8 mm for CT1-CT2 and 0 ± 1.4 mm for CT2-CT3. CONCLUSIONS: The volume changes derived from catheter displacements were small and therefore considered clinically insignificant. Implant configuration remains stable during 2 days of treatment, confirming the safety of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4268808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42688082014-12-17 Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema Dinkla, Anna M Pieters, Bradley R Koedooder, Kees van Wieringen, Niek van der Laarse, Rob Bel, Arjan Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: In pulsed-dose rate prostate brachytherapy the dose is delivered during 48 hours after implantation, making the treatment sensitive to oedematic effects possibly affecting dose delivery. The aim was to study changes in prostate volume during treatment by analysing catheter configurations on three subsequent scans. METHODS: Prostate expansion was determined for 19 patients from the change in spatial distribution of the implanted catheters, using three CT-scans: a planning CT (CT1) and two CTs after 24 and 48 hours (CT2, CT3). An additional 4 patients only received one repeat CT (after 24 hours). The mean radial distance (MRD) of all dwell positions to the geometric centre of all dwell positions used was calculated to evaluate volume changes. From three implanted markers changes in inter-marker distances were assessed. The relative shifts of all dwell positions were determined using catheter- and marker-based registrations. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to compare the results from the different time points. RESULTS: The MRDs measured on the two repeat CTs were significantly different from CT1. The mean prostate volume change derived from the difference in MRD was +4.3% (range −9.3% to +15.6%) for CT1-CT2 (p < .05) and +4.4% (range −7.5% to +16.3%) for CT1-CT3 (p < .05). These values represented a mean increase of 1.2 cm(3) in the first 24 hours and 1.5 cm(3) in the subsequent 24 hours. There was no clear sign of prostate expansion from the change in inter-marker distance (CT1-CT2: 0.2 ± 1.8 mm; CT1-CT3: 0.6 ± 2.2 mm). Catheter configuration remained stable; shifts in catheter positions were largest in the C-C direction: 0 ± 1.8 mm for CT1-CT2 and 0 ± 1.4 mm for CT2-CT3. CONCLUSIONS: The volume changes derived from catheter displacements were small and therefore considered clinically insignificant. Implant configuration remains stable during 2 days of treatment, confirming the safety of this technique. BioMed Central 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4268808/ /pubmed/25497373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0272-9 Text en © Dinkla et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dinkla, Anna M
Pieters, Bradley R
Koedooder, Kees
van Wieringen, Niek
van der Laarse, Rob
Bel, Arjan
Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
title Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
title_full Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
title_fullStr Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
title_full_unstemmed Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
title_short Prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
title_sort prostate volume and implant configuration during 48 hours of temporary prostate brachytherapy: limited effect of oedema
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4268808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25497373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0272-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dinklaannam prostatevolumeandimplantconfigurationduring48hoursoftemporaryprostatebrachytherapylimitedeffectofoedema
AT pietersbradleyr prostatevolumeandimplantconfigurationduring48hoursoftemporaryprostatebrachytherapylimitedeffectofoedema
AT koedooderkees prostatevolumeandimplantconfigurationduring48hoursoftemporaryprostatebrachytherapylimitedeffectofoedema
AT vanwieringenniek prostatevolumeandimplantconfigurationduring48hoursoftemporaryprostatebrachytherapylimitedeffectofoedema
AT vanderlaarserob prostatevolumeandimplantconfigurationduring48hoursoftemporaryprostatebrachytherapylimitedeffectofoedema
AT belarjan prostatevolumeandimplantconfigurationduring48hoursoftemporaryprostatebrachytherapylimitedeffectofoedema