Cargando…

Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Theory predicts that prey facing a combination of predators with different feeding modes have two options: to express a response against the feeding mode of the most dangerous predator, or to express an intermediate response. Intermediate phenotypes protect equally well against several f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel, Cayon, David, Svanbäck, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25517986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115192
_version_ 1782349360923672576
author Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel
Cayon, David
Svanbäck, Richard
author_facet Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel
Cayon, David
Svanbäck, Richard
author_sort Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Theory predicts that prey facing a combination of predators with different feeding modes have two options: to express a response against the feeding mode of the most dangerous predator, or to express an intermediate response. Intermediate phenotypes protect equally well against several feeding modes, rather than providing specific protection against a single predator. Anti-predator traits that protect against a common feeding mode displayed by all predators should be expressed regardless of predator combination, as there is no need for trade-offs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We studied phenotypic anti-predator responses of zebra mussels to predation threat from a handling-time-limited (crayfish) and a gape-size-limited (roach) predator. Both predators dislodge mussels from the substrate but diverge in their further feeding modes. Mussels increased expression of a non-specific defense trait (attachment strength) against all combinations of predators relative to a control. In response to roach alone, mussels showed a tendency to develop a weaker and more elongated shell. In response to crayfish, mussels developed a harder and rounder shell. When exposed to either a combination of predators or no predator, mussels developed an intermediate phenotype. Mussel growth rate was positively correlated with an elongated weaker shell and negatively correlated with a round strong shell, indicating a trade-off between anti-predator responses. Field observations of prey phenotypes revealed the presence of both anti-predator phenotypes and the trade-off with growth, but intra-specific population density and bottom substrate had a greater influence than predator density. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that two different predators can exert both functionally equivalent and inverse selection pressures on a single prey. Our field study suggests that abiotic factors and prey population density should be considered when attempting to explain phenotypic diversity in the wild.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42694372014-12-26 Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel Cayon, David Svanbäck, Richard PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Theory predicts that prey facing a combination of predators with different feeding modes have two options: to express a response against the feeding mode of the most dangerous predator, or to express an intermediate response. Intermediate phenotypes protect equally well against several feeding modes, rather than providing specific protection against a single predator. Anti-predator traits that protect against a common feeding mode displayed by all predators should be expressed regardless of predator combination, as there is no need for trade-offs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We studied phenotypic anti-predator responses of zebra mussels to predation threat from a handling-time-limited (crayfish) and a gape-size-limited (roach) predator. Both predators dislodge mussels from the substrate but diverge in their further feeding modes. Mussels increased expression of a non-specific defense trait (attachment strength) against all combinations of predators relative to a control. In response to roach alone, mussels showed a tendency to develop a weaker and more elongated shell. In response to crayfish, mussels developed a harder and rounder shell. When exposed to either a combination of predators or no predator, mussels developed an intermediate phenotype. Mussel growth rate was positively correlated with an elongated weaker shell and negatively correlated with a round strong shell, indicating a trade-off between anti-predator responses. Field observations of prey phenotypes revealed the presence of both anti-predator phenotypes and the trade-off with growth, but intra-specific population density and bottom substrate had a greater influence than predator density. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that two different predators can exert both functionally equivalent and inverse selection pressures on a single prey. Our field study suggests that abiotic factors and prey population density should be considered when attempting to explain phenotypic diversity in the wild. Public Library of Science 2014-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4269437/ /pubmed/25517986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115192 Text en © 2014 Hirsch et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel
Cayon, David
Svanbäck, Richard
Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study
title Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study
title_full Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study
title_fullStr Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study
title_short Plastic Responses of a Sessile Prey to Multiple Predators: A Field and Experimental Study
title_sort plastic responses of a sessile prey to multiple predators: a field and experimental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25517986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115192
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschphilippemanuel plasticresponsesofasessilepreytomultiplepredatorsafieldandexperimentalstudy
AT cayondavid plasticresponsesofasessilepreytomultiplepredatorsafieldandexperimentalstudy
AT svanbackrichard plasticresponsesofasessilepreytomultiplepredatorsafieldandexperimentalstudy