Cargando…

A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention

INTRODUCTION: Debridement and prosthesis retention, combined with a prolonged antibiotic regimen including rifampicin, is an accepted therapeutic approach when the duration of symptoms is less than 4 weeks and there are no radiological signs of loosening. The outcome of patients managed with this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morata, Laura, Senneville, Eric, Bernard, Louis, Nguyen, Sophie, Buzelé, Rodolphe, Druon, Jérome, Tornero, Eduard, Mensa, Josep, Soriano, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25139552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z
_version_ 1782349383247855616
author Morata, Laura
Senneville, Eric
Bernard, Louis
Nguyen, Sophie
Buzelé, Rodolphe
Druon, Jérome
Tornero, Eduard
Mensa, Josep
Soriano, Alex
author_facet Morata, Laura
Senneville, Eric
Bernard, Louis
Nguyen, Sophie
Buzelé, Rodolphe
Druon, Jérome
Tornero, Eduard
Mensa, Josep
Soriano, Alex
author_sort Morata, Laura
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Debridement and prosthesis retention, combined with a prolonged antibiotic regimen including rifampicin, is an accepted therapeutic approach when the duration of symptoms is less than 4 weeks and there are no radiological signs of loosening. The outcome of patients managed with this strategy has been previously assessed in several articles with success rates of 60–90%. This study aims to review the clinical experience with linezolid in 3 different hospitals from Spain and France in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement, retention of the implant and treated with linezolid with or without rifampicin. METHODS: Patients with an acute PJI who underwent open debridement with implant retention treated with linezolid for more than 7 days in 3 hospitals from Barcelona, Tours and Lille between 2005 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant information about demographics, co-morbidity, type of implant, surgical treatment, microorganism isolated, antimicrobial therapy, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes were recorded from patients. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age (SD) was 70.5 (8.8) years and 9 patients had diabetes mellitus (23%). There were 25 (64%) knee prostheses, 13 (33%) hips and 1 shoulder (3%). The median interquartile range (IQR) days from arthroplasty to infection diagnosis was 17 (19–48) and 33 (85%) cases were diagnosed within the first 60 days. The median (IQR) duration of antibiotic treatment was 70.5 (34–96) days and the median (IQR) number of days on linezolid treatment was 44.5 (30–81). AEs were observed in 15 patients (38%), with gastrointestinal complaints in 8 cases and anemia in 5 being the most frequent. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.5 (1.8–3.6) years, there were 11 failures (28%) (8 relapses and 3 new infections). The failure rate was higher in the rifampicin group (36% vs. 18%) mainly due to a higher relapse rate (27% vs. 12%) although differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Management of acute PJIs with debridement and retention of the implant linezolid, with or without rifampicin, is associated with a high remission rate and it is an alternative treatment for infections due to fluoroquinolone and/or rifampicin-resistant staphylococci. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42696352014-12-19 A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention Morata, Laura Senneville, Eric Bernard, Louis Nguyen, Sophie Buzelé, Rodolphe Druon, Jérome Tornero, Eduard Mensa, Josep Soriano, Alex Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Debridement and prosthesis retention, combined with a prolonged antibiotic regimen including rifampicin, is an accepted therapeutic approach when the duration of symptoms is less than 4 weeks and there are no radiological signs of loosening. The outcome of patients managed with this strategy has been previously assessed in several articles with success rates of 60–90%. This study aims to review the clinical experience with linezolid in 3 different hospitals from Spain and France in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement, retention of the implant and treated with linezolid with or without rifampicin. METHODS: Patients with an acute PJI who underwent open debridement with implant retention treated with linezolid for more than 7 days in 3 hospitals from Barcelona, Tours and Lille between 2005 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant information about demographics, co-morbidity, type of implant, surgical treatment, microorganism isolated, antimicrobial therapy, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes were recorded from patients. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age (SD) was 70.5 (8.8) years and 9 patients had diabetes mellitus (23%). There were 25 (64%) knee prostheses, 13 (33%) hips and 1 shoulder (3%). The median interquartile range (IQR) days from arthroplasty to infection diagnosis was 17 (19–48) and 33 (85%) cases were diagnosed within the first 60 days. The median (IQR) duration of antibiotic treatment was 70.5 (34–96) days and the median (IQR) number of days on linezolid treatment was 44.5 (30–81). AEs were observed in 15 patients (38%), with gastrointestinal complaints in 8 cases and anemia in 5 being the most frequent. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.5 (1.8–3.6) years, there were 11 failures (28%) (8 relapses and 3 new infections). The failure rate was higher in the rifampicin group (36% vs. 18%) mainly due to a higher relapse rate (27% vs. 12%) although differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Management of acute PJIs with debridement and retention of the implant linezolid, with or without rifampicin, is associated with a high remission rate and it is an alternative treatment for infections due to fluoroquinolone and/or rifampicin-resistant staphylococci. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2014-08-20 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4269635/ /pubmed/25139552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Morata, Laura
Senneville, Eric
Bernard, Louis
Nguyen, Sophie
Buzelé, Rodolphe
Druon, Jérome
Tornero, Eduard
Mensa, Josep
Soriano, Alex
A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention
title A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention
title_full A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention
title_fullStr A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention
title_short A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention
title_sort retrospective review of the clinical experience of linezolid with or without rifampicin in prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25139552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z
work_keys_str_mv AT moratalaura aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT sennevilleeric aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT bernardlouis aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT nguyensophie aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT buzelerodolphe aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT druonjerome aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT torneroeduard aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT mensajosep aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT sorianoalex aretrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT moratalaura retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT sennevilleeric retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT bernardlouis retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT nguyensophie retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT buzelerodolphe retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT druonjerome retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT torneroeduard retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT mensajosep retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention
AT sorianoalex retrospectivereviewoftheclinicalexperienceoflinezolidwithorwithoutrifampicininprostheticjointinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandimplantretention