Cargando…
Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long, stable action profile and reduced pharmacodynamic variability. Seven phase 3a trials compared degludec with insulin glargine (glargine). Patient-level meta-analyses were performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9 |
_version_ | 1782349386339057664 |
---|---|
author | Vora, Jiten Christensen, Torsten Rana, Azhar Bain, Steve C. |
author_facet | Vora, Jiten Christensen, Torsten Rana, Azhar Bain, Steve C. |
author_sort | Vora, Jiten |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long, stable action profile and reduced pharmacodynamic variability. Seven phase 3a trials compared degludec with insulin glargine (glargine). Patient-level meta-analyses were performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of differences between the insulin preparations, possible because consistent outcome definitions were utilized. METHODS: Three categories of trials were analyzed: basal–bolus-treated type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM(B/B)), insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM(insulin-naïve)), and basal–bolus-treated T2DM (T2DM(B/B)). Regression models were adjusted for baseline characteristics. Endpoints analyzed were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin dose and hypoglycemic rates analyzed in mutually exclusive groups: non-severe nocturnal, non-severe daytime, and severe. RESULTS: As with previous treat-to-target trials, reductions in HbA(1c) were similar between degludec and glargine. Reductions in FPG were significantly greater with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Total daily insulin dose was significantly lower with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Estimated hypoglycemia rate ratios for degludec/glargine were as follows for T1DM(B/B), T2DM(insulin-naïve) and T2DM(B/B,) respectively: non-severe nocturnal 0.83, 0.64, 0.75 (all P < 0.05); non-severe daytime 1.14 [not significant (ns)], 0.89 (ns), and 0.83 (P < 0.05). Rate ratios for severe events were 1.12 (ns) (T1DM(B/B)); 0.14 (P < 0.05) (T2DM(insulin-naïve)); and not analyzed (T2DM(B/B)) due to too few events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with glargine, degludec is associated with equivalent HbA(1c) control and significantly lower nocturnal hypoglycemia rates. In T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve), degludec is also associated with significantly greater reductions in FPG and lower total doses of insulin versus glargine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4269648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42696482014-12-19 Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials Vora, Jiten Christensen, Torsten Rana, Azhar Bain, Steve C. Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long, stable action profile and reduced pharmacodynamic variability. Seven phase 3a trials compared degludec with insulin glargine (glargine). Patient-level meta-analyses were performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of differences between the insulin preparations, possible because consistent outcome definitions were utilized. METHODS: Three categories of trials were analyzed: basal–bolus-treated type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM(B/B)), insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM(insulin-naïve)), and basal–bolus-treated T2DM (T2DM(B/B)). Regression models were adjusted for baseline characteristics. Endpoints analyzed were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin dose and hypoglycemic rates analyzed in mutually exclusive groups: non-severe nocturnal, non-severe daytime, and severe. RESULTS: As with previous treat-to-target trials, reductions in HbA(1c) were similar between degludec and glargine. Reductions in FPG were significantly greater with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Total daily insulin dose was significantly lower with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Estimated hypoglycemia rate ratios for degludec/glargine were as follows for T1DM(B/B), T2DM(insulin-naïve) and T2DM(B/B,) respectively: non-severe nocturnal 0.83, 0.64, 0.75 (all P < 0.05); non-severe daytime 1.14 [not significant (ns)], 0.89 (ns), and 0.83 (P < 0.05). Rate ratios for severe events were 1.12 (ns) (T1DM(B/B)); 0.14 (P < 0.05) (T2DM(insulin-naïve)); and not analyzed (T2DM(B/B)) due to too few events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with glargine, degludec is associated with equivalent HbA(1c) control and significantly lower nocturnal hypoglycemia rates. In T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve), degludec is also associated with significantly greater reductions in FPG and lower total doses of insulin versus glargine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2014-08-01 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4269648/ /pubmed/25081590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vora, Jiten Christensen, Torsten Rana, Azhar Bain, Steve C. Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials |
title | Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials |
title_full | Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials |
title_fullStr | Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials |
title_short | Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials |
title_sort | insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of endpoints in phase 3a trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vorajiten insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials AT christensentorsten insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials AT ranaazhar insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials AT bainstevec insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials |