Cargando…

Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials

INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long, stable action profile and reduced pharmacodynamic variability. Seven phase 3a trials compared degludec with insulin glargine (glargine). Patient-level meta-analyses were performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vora, Jiten, Christensen, Torsten, Rana, Azhar, Bain, Steve C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9
_version_ 1782349386339057664
author Vora, Jiten
Christensen, Torsten
Rana, Azhar
Bain, Steve C.
author_facet Vora, Jiten
Christensen, Torsten
Rana, Azhar
Bain, Steve C.
author_sort Vora, Jiten
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long, stable action profile and reduced pharmacodynamic variability. Seven phase 3a trials compared degludec with insulin glargine (glargine). Patient-level meta-analyses were performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of differences between the insulin preparations, possible because consistent outcome definitions were utilized. METHODS: Three categories of trials were analyzed: basal–bolus-treated type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM(B/B)), insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM(insulin-naïve)), and basal–bolus-treated T2DM (T2DM(B/B)). Regression models were adjusted for baseline characteristics. Endpoints analyzed were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin dose and hypoglycemic rates analyzed in mutually exclusive groups: non-severe nocturnal, non-severe daytime, and severe. RESULTS: As with previous treat-to-target trials, reductions in HbA(1c) were similar between degludec and glargine. Reductions in FPG were significantly greater with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Total daily insulin dose was significantly lower with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Estimated hypoglycemia rate ratios for degludec/glargine were as follows for T1DM(B/B), T2DM(insulin-naïve) and T2DM(B/B,) respectively: non-severe nocturnal 0.83, 0.64, 0.75 (all P < 0.05); non-severe daytime 1.14 [not significant (ns)], 0.89 (ns), and 0.83 (P < 0.05). Rate ratios for severe events were 1.12 (ns) (T1DM(B/B)); 0.14 (P < 0.05) (T2DM(insulin-naïve)); and not analyzed (T2DM(B/B)) due to too few events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with glargine, degludec is associated with equivalent HbA(1c) control and significantly lower nocturnal hypoglycemia rates. In T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve), degludec is also associated with significantly greater reductions in FPG and lower total doses of insulin versus glargine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42696482014-12-19 Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials Vora, Jiten Christensen, Torsten Rana, Azhar Bain, Steve C. Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Insulin degludec (degludec) is a basal insulin with an ultra-long, stable action profile and reduced pharmacodynamic variability. Seven phase 3a trials compared degludec with insulin glargine (glargine). Patient-level meta-analyses were performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of differences between the insulin preparations, possible because consistent outcome definitions were utilized. METHODS: Three categories of trials were analyzed: basal–bolus-treated type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM(B/B)), insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM(insulin-naïve)), and basal–bolus-treated T2DM (T2DM(B/B)). Regression models were adjusted for baseline characteristics. Endpoints analyzed were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin dose and hypoglycemic rates analyzed in mutually exclusive groups: non-severe nocturnal, non-severe daytime, and severe. RESULTS: As with previous treat-to-target trials, reductions in HbA(1c) were similar between degludec and glargine. Reductions in FPG were significantly greater with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Total daily insulin dose was significantly lower with degludec in T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve). Estimated hypoglycemia rate ratios for degludec/glargine were as follows for T1DM(B/B), T2DM(insulin-naïve) and T2DM(B/B,) respectively: non-severe nocturnal 0.83, 0.64, 0.75 (all P < 0.05); non-severe daytime 1.14 [not significant (ns)], 0.89 (ns), and 0.83 (P < 0.05). Rate ratios for severe events were 1.12 (ns) (T1DM(B/B)); 0.14 (P < 0.05) (T2DM(insulin-naïve)); and not analyzed (T2DM(B/B)) due to too few events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with glargine, degludec is associated with equivalent HbA(1c) control and significantly lower nocturnal hypoglycemia rates. In T1DM(B/B) and T2DM(insulin-naïve), degludec is also associated with significantly greater reductions in FPG and lower total doses of insulin versus glargine. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2014-08-01 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4269648/ /pubmed/25081590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vora, Jiten
Christensen, Torsten
Rana, Azhar
Bain, Steve C.
Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
title Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
title_full Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
title_fullStr Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
title_full_unstemmed Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
title_short Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Endpoints in Phase 3a Trials
title_sort insulin degludec versus insulin glargine in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of endpoints in phase 3a trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0076-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vorajiten insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials
AT christensentorsten insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials
AT ranaazhar insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials
AT bainstevec insulindegludecversusinsulinglargineintype1andtype2diabetesmellitusametaanalysisofendpointsinphase3atrials