Cargando…

Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an increasing problem worldwide and a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. As beta cell function declines, the management of T2DM typically comprises of escalations in treatment from diet and exercise to oral therapies and eventually insuli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Hayley, McEwan, Phil, Bergenheim, Klas, Gordon, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25185770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0079-6
_version_ 1782349388202377216
author Bennett, Hayley
McEwan, Phil
Bergenheim, Klas
Gordon, Jason
author_facet Bennett, Hayley
McEwan, Phil
Bergenheim, Klas
Gordon, Jason
author_sort Bennett, Hayley
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an increasing problem worldwide and a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. As beta cell function declines, the management of T2DM typically comprises of escalations in treatment from diet and exercise to oral therapies and eventually insulin. Treatment algorithms based on the attainment of blood glucose targets may not account for changes in other cardiovascular risk factors. The objective of this study is to describe unmet clinical need, defined as failure to reduce weight or meet targets for blood pressure, total cholesterol or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. METHODS: Anonymized UK patient data for those (1) initiating oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) monotherapy, (2) escalating to dual therapy, (3) escalating to triple therapy, and (4) escalating to insulin therapy over the study period (01/01/2005–31/12/2009) were obtained from The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Changes in risk factors were evaluated before and after therapy escalation, and the attainment of targets, assessed at the last recorded measurement, as follows: HbA1c <7.5%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg, total cholesterol (TC) <5 mmol/L, and reduction in weight. RESULTS: Prior to therapy escalation, mean HbA1c in each subgroup exceeded 7.5% and was higher respective to the number of OADs being used (monotherapy: 8.03%; double: 8.48%; triple: 8.71%). Insulin users displayed the highest HbA1c prior to treatment escalation (9.78%). Following escalation, a decline in HbA1c was observed in all subgroups. By contrast, mean SBP and TC levels decreased prior to the addition of a second and third oral therapy. Consistent improvements following treatment escalation were not observed across the other risk factors following therapy escalation. Overall, the proportion of subjects that attained all four targets ranged from 3% (monotherapy and insulin) to 6% (dual therapy). CONCLUSION: The potential unmet clinical need among conventionally treated T2DM patients is significant, with respect to the control of blood glucose and other cardiovascular risk factors: SBP, TC, and weight. There clearly remains the need for new therapeutic approaches to alleviate the burden associated with T2DM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0079-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42696562014-12-19 Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK Bennett, Hayley McEwan, Phil Bergenheim, Klas Gordon, Jason Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an increasing problem worldwide and a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. As beta cell function declines, the management of T2DM typically comprises of escalations in treatment from diet and exercise to oral therapies and eventually insulin. Treatment algorithms based on the attainment of blood glucose targets may not account for changes in other cardiovascular risk factors. The objective of this study is to describe unmet clinical need, defined as failure to reduce weight or meet targets for blood pressure, total cholesterol or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. METHODS: Anonymized UK patient data for those (1) initiating oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) monotherapy, (2) escalating to dual therapy, (3) escalating to triple therapy, and (4) escalating to insulin therapy over the study period (01/01/2005–31/12/2009) were obtained from The Health Improvement Network (THIN). Changes in risk factors were evaluated before and after therapy escalation, and the attainment of targets, assessed at the last recorded measurement, as follows: HbA1c <7.5%, systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg, total cholesterol (TC) <5 mmol/L, and reduction in weight. RESULTS: Prior to therapy escalation, mean HbA1c in each subgroup exceeded 7.5% and was higher respective to the number of OADs being used (monotherapy: 8.03%; double: 8.48%; triple: 8.71%). Insulin users displayed the highest HbA1c prior to treatment escalation (9.78%). Following escalation, a decline in HbA1c was observed in all subgroups. By contrast, mean SBP and TC levels decreased prior to the addition of a second and third oral therapy. Consistent improvements following treatment escalation were not observed across the other risk factors following therapy escalation. Overall, the proportion of subjects that attained all four targets ranged from 3% (monotherapy and insulin) to 6% (dual therapy). CONCLUSION: The potential unmet clinical need among conventionally treated T2DM patients is significant, with respect to the control of blood glucose and other cardiovascular risk factors: SBP, TC, and weight. There clearly remains the need for new therapeutic approaches to alleviate the burden associated with T2DM. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0079-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2014-09-04 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4269656/ /pubmed/25185770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0079-6 Text en © Springer Healthcare 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bennett, Hayley
McEwan, Phil
Bergenheim, Klas
Gordon, Jason
Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK
title Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK
title_full Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK
title_fullStr Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK
title_short Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK
title_sort assessment of unmet clinical need in type 2 diabetic patients on conventional therapy in the uk
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25185770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-014-0079-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bennetthayley assessmentofunmetclinicalneedintype2diabeticpatientsonconventionaltherapyintheuk
AT mcewanphil assessmentofunmetclinicalneedintype2diabeticpatientsonconventionaltherapyintheuk
AT bergenheimklas assessmentofunmetclinicalneedintype2diabeticpatientsonconventionaltherapyintheuk
AT gordonjason assessmentofunmetclinicalneedintype2diabeticpatientsonconventionaltherapyintheuk