Cargando…

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) imposes a substantial burden on patients, health care systems and society due to increasing incidence and poor survival rates. In recent years, advances in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC have resulted from the introduction of targeted therapies. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lange, Ansgar, Prenzler, Anne, Frank, Martin, Golpon, Heiko, Welte, Tobias, von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-192
_version_ 1782349401073647616
author Lange, Ansgar
Prenzler, Anne
Frank, Martin
Golpon, Heiko
Welte, Tobias
von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
author_facet Lange, Ansgar
Prenzler, Anne
Frank, Martin
Golpon, Heiko
Welte, Tobias
von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
author_sort Lange, Ansgar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) imposes a substantial burden on patients, health care systems and society due to increasing incidence and poor survival rates. In recent years, advances in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC have resulted from the introduction of targeted therapies. However, the application of these new agents increases treatment costs considerably. The objective of this article is to review the economic evidence of targeted therapies in metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility studies. Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and 9 other databases were searched from 2000 through April 2013 (including update) for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via the validated Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (including update) involving the MoAb bevacizumab and the Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib met all inclusion criteria. The majority of studies analyzed the CE of first-line maintenance and second-line treatment with erlotinib. Five studies dealt with bevacizumab in first-line regimes. Gefitinib and pharmacogenomic profiling were each covered by only two studies. Furthermore, the available evidence was of only fair quality. CONCLUSION: First-line maintenance treatment with erlotinib compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) can be considered cost-effective. In comparison to docetaxel, erlotinib is likely to be cost-effective in subsequent treatment regimens as well. The insights for bevacizumab are miscellaneous. There are findings that gefitinib is cost-effective in first- and second-line treatment, however, based on only two studies. The role of pharmacogenomic testing needs to be evaluated. Therefore, future research should improve the available evidence and consider pharmacogenomic profiling as specified by the European Medicines Agency. Upcoming agents like crizotinib and afatinib need to be analyzed as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-192) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42698532014-12-18 A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Lange, Ansgar Prenzler, Anne Frank, Martin Golpon, Heiko Welte, Tobias von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) imposes a substantial burden on patients, health care systems and society due to increasing incidence and poor survival rates. In recent years, advances in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC have resulted from the introduction of targeted therapies. However, the application of these new agents increases treatment costs considerably. The objective of this article is to review the economic evidence of targeted therapies in metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility studies. Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and 9 other databases were searched from 2000 through April 2013 (including update) for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via the validated Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (including update) involving the MoAb bevacizumab and the Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib met all inclusion criteria. The majority of studies analyzed the CE of first-line maintenance and second-line treatment with erlotinib. Five studies dealt with bevacizumab in first-line regimes. Gefitinib and pharmacogenomic profiling were each covered by only two studies. Furthermore, the available evidence was of only fair quality. CONCLUSION: First-line maintenance treatment with erlotinib compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) can be considered cost-effective. In comparison to docetaxel, erlotinib is likely to be cost-effective in subsequent treatment regimens as well. The insights for bevacizumab are miscellaneous. There are findings that gefitinib is cost-effective in first- and second-line treatment, however, based on only two studies. The role of pharmacogenomic testing needs to be evaluated. Therefore, future research should improve the available evidence and consider pharmacogenomic profiling as specified by the European Medicines Agency. Upcoming agents like crizotinib and afatinib need to be analyzed as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-192) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4269853/ /pubmed/25471553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-192 Text en © Lange et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lange, Ansgar
Prenzler, Anne
Frank, Martin
Golpon, Heiko
Welte, Tobias
von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
title A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
title_full A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
title_fullStr A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
title_short A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
title_sort systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-192
work_keys_str_mv AT langeansgar asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT prenzleranne asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT frankmartin asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT golponheiko asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT weltetobias asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT vonderschulenburgjmatthias asystematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT langeansgar systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT prenzleranne systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT frankmartin systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT golponheiko systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT weltetobias systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc
AT vonderschulenburgjmatthias systematicreviewofthecosteffectivenessoftargetedtherapiesformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancernsclc