Cargando…

The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts

The Registry of Standard Biological Parts only accepts genetic parts compatible with the RFC 10 BioBrick format. This combined assembly and submission standard requires that four unique restriction enzyme sites must not occur in the DNA sequence encoding a part. We present evidence that this require...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alnahhas, Razan N, Slater, Ben, Huang, Yunle, Mortensen, Catherine, Monk, Jordan W, Okasheh, Yousef, Howard, Marco D, Gottel, Neil R, Hammerling, Michael J, Barrick, Jeffrey E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-8-28
_version_ 1782349417326575616
author Alnahhas, Razan N
Slater, Ben
Huang, Yunle
Mortensen, Catherine
Monk, Jordan W
Okasheh, Yousef
Howard, Marco D
Gottel, Neil R
Hammerling, Michael J
Barrick, Jeffrey E
author_facet Alnahhas, Razan N
Slater, Ben
Huang, Yunle
Mortensen, Catherine
Monk, Jordan W
Okasheh, Yousef
Howard, Marco D
Gottel, Neil R
Hammerling, Michael J
Barrick, Jeffrey E
author_sort Alnahhas, Razan N
collection PubMed
description The Registry of Standard Biological Parts only accepts genetic parts compatible with the RFC 10 BioBrick format. This combined assembly and submission standard requires that four unique restriction enzyme sites must not occur in the DNA sequence encoding a part. We present evidence that this requirement places a nontrivial burden on iGEM teams developing large and novel parts. We further argue that the emergence of inexpensive DNA synthesis and versatile assembly methods reduces the utility of coupling submission and assembly standards and propose a submission standard that is compatible with current quality control strategies while nearly eliminating sequence constraints on submitted parts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42699342014-12-18 The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts Alnahhas, Razan N Slater, Ben Huang, Yunle Mortensen, Catherine Monk, Jordan W Okasheh, Yousef Howard, Marco D Gottel, Neil R Hammerling, Michael J Barrick, Jeffrey E J Biol Eng Letters to the Editor The Registry of Standard Biological Parts only accepts genetic parts compatible with the RFC 10 BioBrick format. This combined assembly and submission standard requires that four unique restriction enzyme sites must not occur in the DNA sequence encoding a part. We present evidence that this requirement places a nontrivial burden on iGEM teams developing large and novel parts. We further argue that the emergence of inexpensive DNA synthesis and versatile assembly methods reduces the utility of coupling submission and assembly standards and propose a submission standard that is compatible with current quality control strategies while nearly eliminating sequence constraints on submitted parts. BioMed Central 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4269934/ /pubmed/25525459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-8-28 Text en © Alnahhas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Letters to the Editor
Alnahhas, Razan N
Slater, Ben
Huang, Yunle
Mortensen, Catherine
Monk, Jordan W
Okasheh, Yousef
Howard, Marco D
Gottel, Neil R
Hammerling, Michael J
Barrick, Jeffrey E
The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
title The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
title_full The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
title_fullStr The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
title_full_unstemmed The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
title_short The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
title_sort case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
topic Letters to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-8-28
work_keys_str_mv AT alnahhasrazann thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT slaterben thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT huangyunle thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT mortensencatherine thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT monkjordanw thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT okashehyousef thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT howardmarcod thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT gottelneilr thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT hammerlingmichaelj thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT barrickjeffreye thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT alnahhasrazann casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT slaterben casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT huangyunle casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT mortensencatherine casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT monkjordanw casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT okashehyousef casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT howardmarcod casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT gottelneilr casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT hammerlingmichaelj casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts
AT barrickjeffreye casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts