Cargando…
The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts
The Registry of Standard Biological Parts only accepts genetic parts compatible with the RFC 10 BioBrick format. This combined assembly and submission standard requires that four unique restriction enzyme sites must not occur in the DNA sequence encoding a part. We present evidence that this require...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-8-28 |
_version_ | 1782349417326575616 |
---|---|
author | Alnahhas, Razan N Slater, Ben Huang, Yunle Mortensen, Catherine Monk, Jordan W Okasheh, Yousef Howard, Marco D Gottel, Neil R Hammerling, Michael J Barrick, Jeffrey E |
author_facet | Alnahhas, Razan N Slater, Ben Huang, Yunle Mortensen, Catherine Monk, Jordan W Okasheh, Yousef Howard, Marco D Gottel, Neil R Hammerling, Michael J Barrick, Jeffrey E |
author_sort | Alnahhas, Razan N |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Registry of Standard Biological Parts only accepts genetic parts compatible with the RFC 10 BioBrick format. This combined assembly and submission standard requires that four unique restriction enzyme sites must not occur in the DNA sequence encoding a part. We present evidence that this requirement places a nontrivial burden on iGEM teams developing large and novel parts. We further argue that the emergence of inexpensive DNA synthesis and versatile assembly methods reduces the utility of coupling submission and assembly standards and propose a submission standard that is compatible with current quality control strategies while nearly eliminating sequence constraints on submitted parts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4269934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42699342014-12-18 The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts Alnahhas, Razan N Slater, Ben Huang, Yunle Mortensen, Catherine Monk, Jordan W Okasheh, Yousef Howard, Marco D Gottel, Neil R Hammerling, Michael J Barrick, Jeffrey E J Biol Eng Letters to the Editor The Registry of Standard Biological Parts only accepts genetic parts compatible with the RFC 10 BioBrick format. This combined assembly and submission standard requires that four unique restriction enzyme sites must not occur in the DNA sequence encoding a part. We present evidence that this requirement places a nontrivial burden on iGEM teams developing large and novel parts. We further argue that the emergence of inexpensive DNA synthesis and versatile assembly methods reduces the utility of coupling submission and assembly standards and propose a submission standard that is compatible with current quality control strategies while nearly eliminating sequence constraints on submitted parts. BioMed Central 2014-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4269934/ /pubmed/25525459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-8-28 Text en © Alnahhas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Letters to the Editor Alnahhas, Razan N Slater, Ben Huang, Yunle Mortensen, Catherine Monk, Jordan W Okasheh, Yousef Howard, Marco D Gottel, Neil R Hammerling, Michael J Barrick, Jeffrey E The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
title | The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
title_full | The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
title_fullStr | The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
title_full_unstemmed | The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
title_short | The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
title_sort | case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts |
topic | Letters to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25525459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-8-28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alnahhasrazann thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT slaterben thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT huangyunle thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT mortensencatherine thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT monkjordanw thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT okashehyousef thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT howardmarcod thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT gottelneilr thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT hammerlingmichaelj thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT barrickjeffreye thecasefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT alnahhasrazann casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT slaterben casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT huangyunle casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT mortensencatherine casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT monkjordanw casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT okashehyousef casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT howardmarcod casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT gottelneilr casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT hammerlingmichaelj casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts AT barrickjeffreye casefordecouplingassemblyandsubmissionstandardstomaintainamoreflexibleregistryofbiologicalparts |