Cargando…
Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review
BACKGROUND: Submission of study protocols to research ethics committees (RECs) constitutes one of the earliest stages at which planned trials are documented in detail. Previous studies have investigated the amendments requested from researchers by RECs, but the type of issues raised during REC revie...
Autores principales: | van Lent, Marlies, Rongen, Gerard A, Out, Henk J |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25490963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-83 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Peer review comments on drug trials submitted to medical journals differ depending on sponsorship, results and acceptance: a retrospective cohort study
por: van Lent, Marlies, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evolution of Ethics in Clinical Research and Ethics Committee
por: Das, Nilay Kanti, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Ethics committee member: Reviewing the ‘Ethics’ in clinical research
por: Tripathi, Raakhi
Publicado: (2013) -
Incorporating ethical principles into clinical research protocols: a tool for protocol writers and ethics committees
por: Li, Rebecca H, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee
por: Halkoaho, Arja, et al.
Publicado: (2012)