Cargando…
Evidence-based treatment for Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD)
BACKGROUND: Depersonalisation-derealisation disorder (DPRD) is a distressing and impairing condition with a pathophysiology that is not well understood. Nevertheless, given the growing interest in its pathogenesis, and the publication of a number of treatment trials, a systematic review of randomise...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-20 |
_version_ | 1782349426322309120 |
---|---|
author | Somer, Eli Amos-Williams, Taryn Stein, Dan J |
author_facet | Somer, Eli Amos-Williams, Taryn Stein, Dan J |
author_sort | Somer, Eli |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Depersonalisation-derealisation disorder (DPRD) is a distressing and impairing condition with a pathophysiology that is not well understood. Nevertheless, given the growing interest in its pathogenesis, and the publication of a number of treatment trials, a systematic review of randomised controlled pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy trials is timely. METHODS: A systematic search of articles on DPRD published from January 1980 to August 2012, using Cochrane methods, was conducted. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, somatic interventions and a blend of these modalities for the treatment of depersonalisation disorder were included in the review. Searches were carried out on multiple databases. The bibliographies of all identified trials were checked for additional studies and authors were contacted for published trials. No unpublished trials were found and no restrictions were placed on language and setting. Data extraction sheets were further designed to enter specified data from each trial and risk of bias information was identified. PRISMA guidelines were also followed to ensure that our methodology and reporting were comprehensive. Of the unique 1296 papers that were retrieved, four studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. RESULTS: Four RCTs (all within the duration of 12 weeks or less) met study criteria and were included (180 participants; age range 18–65 years). The four RCTs included two lamotrigine studies, one fluoxetine study and one biofeedback study. Evidence for the treatment efficacy of lamotrigine was found in one study (Cambridge Dissociation Scale, CDC: p < 0.001) with no evidence of effect for lamotrigine in the second study (CDS: p = 0.61 or Present State Examination: p = 0.17). Fluoxetine and biofeedback were not more efficacious than the control condition, although there was a trend for fluoxetine to demonstrate greater efficacy in those with comorbid anxiety disorder. The four studies had 'low' or 'unclear' risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The limited data from randomised controlled trials on the pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy of DPRD demonstrates inconsistent evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine, and no efficacy for other interventions. Additional research on this disorder is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4269982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42699822015-01-06 Evidence-based treatment for Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) Somer, Eli Amos-Williams, Taryn Stein, Dan J BMC Psychol Research Article BACKGROUND: Depersonalisation-derealisation disorder (DPRD) is a distressing and impairing condition with a pathophysiology that is not well understood. Nevertheless, given the growing interest in its pathogenesis, and the publication of a number of treatment trials, a systematic review of randomised controlled pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy trials is timely. METHODS: A systematic search of articles on DPRD published from January 1980 to August 2012, using Cochrane methods, was conducted. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, somatic interventions and a blend of these modalities for the treatment of depersonalisation disorder were included in the review. Searches were carried out on multiple databases. The bibliographies of all identified trials were checked for additional studies and authors were contacted for published trials. No unpublished trials were found and no restrictions were placed on language and setting. Data extraction sheets were further designed to enter specified data from each trial and risk of bias information was identified. PRISMA guidelines were also followed to ensure that our methodology and reporting were comprehensive. Of the unique 1296 papers that were retrieved, four studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. RESULTS: Four RCTs (all within the duration of 12 weeks or less) met study criteria and were included (180 participants; age range 18–65 years). The four RCTs included two lamotrigine studies, one fluoxetine study and one biofeedback study. Evidence for the treatment efficacy of lamotrigine was found in one study (Cambridge Dissociation Scale, CDC: p < 0.001) with no evidence of effect for lamotrigine in the second study (CDS: p = 0.61 or Present State Examination: p = 0.17). Fluoxetine and biofeedback were not more efficacious than the control condition, although there was a trend for fluoxetine to demonstrate greater efficacy in those with comorbid anxiety disorder. The four studies had 'low' or 'unclear' risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The limited data from randomised controlled trials on the pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy of DPRD demonstrates inconsistent evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine, and no efficacy for other interventions. Additional research on this disorder is needed. BioMed Central 2013-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4269982/ /pubmed/25566370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-20 Text en © Somer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Somer, Eli Amos-Williams, Taryn Stein, Dan J Evidence-based treatment for Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) |
title | Evidence-based treatment for
Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) |
title_full | Evidence-based treatment for
Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) |
title_fullStr | Evidence-based treatment for
Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence-based treatment for
Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) |
title_short | Evidence-based treatment for
Depersonalisation-derealisation Disorder (DPRD) |
title_sort | evidence-based treatment for
depersonalisation-derealisation disorder (dprd) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT somereli evidencebasedtreatmentfordepersonalisationderealisationdisorderdprd AT amoswilliamstaryn evidencebasedtreatmentfordepersonalisationderealisationdisorderdprd AT steindanj evidencebasedtreatmentfordepersonalisationderealisationdisorderdprd |