Cargando…

Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers

BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence rates among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) population are significantly higher than the general population. However, there is limited research on smoking cessation treatments in this group, particularly on culturally targeted interventions. Moreover...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Alicia K, McConnell, Elizabeth A, Li, Chien-Ching, Vargas, Maria C, King, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-2-12
_version_ 1782349429150318592
author Matthews, Alicia K
McConnell, Elizabeth A
Li, Chien-Ching
Vargas, Maria C
King, Andrea
author_facet Matthews, Alicia K
McConnell, Elizabeth A
Li, Chien-Ching
Vargas, Maria C
King, Andrea
author_sort Matthews, Alicia K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence rates among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) population are significantly higher than the general population. However, there is limited research on smoking cessation treatments in this group, particularly on culturally targeted interventions. Moreover, there are few interventions that address culturally specific psychosocial variables (e.g., minority stress) that may influence outcomes. This paper describes the protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial testing an evidence-based smoking cessation program, Courage to Quit, against a culturally tailored version for LGBT smokers, and examines the role of culturally specific psychosocial variables on cessation outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: To examine the effectiveness of a culturally targeted versus standard smoking cessation intervention, the study utilizes a 2-arm block, randomized, control trial (RCT) design. Adult LGBT participants (n = 400) are randomized to one of the two programs each consisting of a six-session group program delivered in a community center and an eight week supply of the transdermal nicotine patch. Four individualized telephone counseling sessions occur at weeks 2, 5, 7, and 9, at times of greatest risk for relapse. Study outcome measures are collected at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post quit date. Primary outcomes are expired air carbon monoxide verified 7-day point-prevalence quit rates at each measurement period. Secondary outcomes assess changes in cravings, withdrawal symptoms, smoking cessation self-efficacy, and treatment adherence. Additionally, study staff examines the role of culturally specific psychosocial variables on cessation outcomes using path analysis. DISCUSSION: Determining the efficacy of culturally specific versus standard evidence based approaches to smoking cessation is a critical issue facing the field today. This study provides a model for the development and implementation of a culturally tailored smoking cessation intervention for LGBT participants and addresses a gap in the field by examining the role of culturally psychosocial variables associated with cessation outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials NCT01633567 Registered 30 May 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4269994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42699942015-01-06 Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers Matthews, Alicia K McConnell, Elizabeth A Li, Chien-Ching Vargas, Maria C King, Andrea BMC Psychol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence rates among the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) population are significantly higher than the general population. However, there is limited research on smoking cessation treatments in this group, particularly on culturally targeted interventions. Moreover, there are few interventions that address culturally specific psychosocial variables (e.g., minority stress) that may influence outcomes. This paper describes the protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial testing an evidence-based smoking cessation program, Courage to Quit, against a culturally tailored version for LGBT smokers, and examines the role of culturally specific psychosocial variables on cessation outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: To examine the effectiveness of a culturally targeted versus standard smoking cessation intervention, the study utilizes a 2-arm block, randomized, control trial (RCT) design. Adult LGBT participants (n = 400) are randomized to one of the two programs each consisting of a six-session group program delivered in a community center and an eight week supply of the transdermal nicotine patch. Four individualized telephone counseling sessions occur at weeks 2, 5, 7, and 9, at times of greatest risk for relapse. Study outcome measures are collected at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post quit date. Primary outcomes are expired air carbon monoxide verified 7-day point-prevalence quit rates at each measurement period. Secondary outcomes assess changes in cravings, withdrawal symptoms, smoking cessation self-efficacy, and treatment adherence. Additionally, study staff examines the role of culturally specific psychosocial variables on cessation outcomes using path analysis. DISCUSSION: Determining the efficacy of culturally specific versus standard evidence based approaches to smoking cessation is a critical issue facing the field today. This study provides a model for the development and implementation of a culturally tailored smoking cessation intervention for LGBT participants and addresses a gap in the field by examining the role of culturally psychosocial variables associated with cessation outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials NCT01633567 Registered 30 May 2012. BioMed Central 2014-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4269994/ /pubmed/25566383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-2-12 Text en © Matthews et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Matthews, Alicia K
McConnell, Elizabeth A
Li, Chien-Ching
Vargas, Maria C
King, Andrea
Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers
title Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers
title_full Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers
title_fullStr Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers
title_full_unstemmed Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers
title_short Design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers
title_sort design of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of a culturally tailored versus standard community-based smoking cessation treatment program for lgbt smokers
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-2-12
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewsaliciak designofacomparativeeffectivenessevaluationofaculturallytailoredversusstandardcommunitybasedsmokingcessationtreatmentprogramforlgbtsmokers
AT mcconnellelizabetha designofacomparativeeffectivenessevaluationofaculturallytailoredversusstandardcommunitybasedsmokingcessationtreatmentprogramforlgbtsmokers
AT lichienching designofacomparativeeffectivenessevaluationofaculturallytailoredversusstandardcommunitybasedsmokingcessationtreatmentprogramforlgbtsmokers
AT vargasmariac designofacomparativeeffectivenessevaluationofaculturallytailoredversusstandardcommunitybasedsmokingcessationtreatmentprogramforlgbtsmokers
AT kingandrea designofacomparativeeffectivenessevaluationofaculturallytailoredversusstandardcommunitybasedsmokingcessationtreatmentprogramforlgbtsmokers