Cargando…

Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare

Many autotrophs vary their allocation to nutrient uptake in response to environmental cues, yet the dynamics of this plasticity are largely unknown. Plasticity dynamics affect the extent of single versus multiple nutrient limitation and thus have implications for plant ecology and biogeochemical cyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menge, Duncan N. L., Ballantyne, Ford, Weitz, Joshua S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25540674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0
_version_ 1782349495364747264
author Menge, Duncan N. L.
Ballantyne, Ford
Weitz, Joshua S.
author_facet Menge, Duncan N. L.
Ballantyne, Ford
Weitz, Joshua S.
author_sort Menge, Duncan N. L.
collection PubMed
description Many autotrophs vary their allocation to nutrient uptake in response to environmental cues, yet the dynamics of this plasticity are largely unknown. Plasticity dynamics affect the extent of single versus multiple nutrient limitation and thus have implications for plant ecology and biogeochemical cycling. Here we use a model of two essential nutrients cycling through autotrophs and the environment to determine conditions under which different plastic or fixed nutrient uptake strategies are adaptive. Our model includes environment-independent costs of being plastic, environment-dependent costs proportional to the rate of plastic change, and costs of being mismatched to the environment, the last of which is experienced by both fixed and plastic types. In equilibrium environments, environment-independent costs of being plastic select for tortoise strategies—fixed or less plastic types—provided that they are sufficiently close to co-limitation. At intermediate levels of environmental fluctuation forced by periodic nutrient inputs, more hare-like plastic strategies prevail because they remain near co-limitation. However, the fastest is not necessarily the best. The most adaptive strategy is an intermediate level of plasticity that keeps pace with environmental fluctuations, but is not faster. At high levels of environmental fluctuation, the environment-dependent cost of changing rapidly to keep pace with the environment becomes prohibitive and tortoise strategies again dominate. The existence and location of these thresholds depend on plasticity costs and rate, which are largely unknown empirically. These results suggest that the expectations for single nutrient limitation versus co-limitation and therefore biogeochemical cycling and autotroph community dynamics depend on environmental heterogeneity and plasticity costs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4270431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42704312014-12-22 Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare Menge, Duncan N. L. Ballantyne, Ford Weitz, Joshua S. Theor Ecol Original Paper Many autotrophs vary their allocation to nutrient uptake in response to environmental cues, yet the dynamics of this plasticity are largely unknown. Plasticity dynamics affect the extent of single versus multiple nutrient limitation and thus have implications for plant ecology and biogeochemical cycling. Here we use a model of two essential nutrients cycling through autotrophs and the environment to determine conditions under which different plastic or fixed nutrient uptake strategies are adaptive. Our model includes environment-independent costs of being plastic, environment-dependent costs proportional to the rate of plastic change, and costs of being mismatched to the environment, the last of which is experienced by both fixed and plastic types. In equilibrium environments, environment-independent costs of being plastic select for tortoise strategies—fixed or less plastic types—provided that they are sufficiently close to co-limitation. At intermediate levels of environmental fluctuation forced by periodic nutrient inputs, more hare-like plastic strategies prevail because they remain near co-limitation. However, the fastest is not necessarily the best. The most adaptive strategy is an intermediate level of plasticity that keeps pace with environmental fluctuations, but is not faster. At high levels of environmental fluctuation, the environment-dependent cost of changing rapidly to keep pace with the environment becomes prohibitive and tortoise strategies again dominate. The existence and location of these thresholds depend on plasticity costs and rate, which are largely unknown empirically. These results suggest that the expectations for single nutrient limitation versus co-limitation and therefore biogeochemical cycling and autotroph community dynamics depend on environmental heterogeneity and plasticity costs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2011-01-11 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC4270431/ /pubmed/25540674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Menge, Duncan N. L.
Ballantyne, Ford
Weitz, Joshua S.
Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
title Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
title_full Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
title_fullStr Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
title_short Dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
title_sort dynamics of nutrient uptake strategies: lessons from the tortoise and the hare
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25540674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12080-010-0110-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mengeduncannl dynamicsofnutrientuptakestrategieslessonsfromthetortoiseandthehare
AT ballantyneford dynamicsofnutrientuptakestrategieslessonsfromthetortoiseandthehare
AT weitzjoshuas dynamicsofnutrientuptakestrategieslessonsfromthetortoiseandthehare