Cargando…

Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case

The French health care system embraced New Public Management (NPM) selectively, and crafted their own version of NPM using Diagnostic-Related-Group accounting to re-centralize the health care system. Other organizational changes include the adoption of quasi-markets, public private partnerships, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Simonet, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4271340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-57
_version_ 1782349585979539456
author Simonet, Daniel
author_facet Simonet, Daniel
author_sort Simonet, Daniel
collection PubMed
description The French health care system embraced New Public Management (NPM) selectively, and crafted their own version of NPM using Diagnostic-Related-Group accounting to re-centralize the health care system. Other organizational changes include the adoption of quasi-markets, public private partnerships, and pay-for-performance schemes for General Practitioners. There is little evidence that these improved the performance of the system. Misrepresentation has remained high. With the 2009 Hospital, Patients, Health and Territories Act physician participation in hospital governance receded. Decision-making powers and health units were re-concentrated to instill greater national coherence into the health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4271340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42713402014-12-20 Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case Simonet, Daniel Health Res Policy Syst Commentary The French health care system embraced New Public Management (NPM) selectively, and crafted their own version of NPM using Diagnostic-Related-Group accounting to re-centralize the health care system. Other organizational changes include the adoption of quasi-markets, public private partnerships, and pay-for-performance schemes for General Practitioners. There is little evidence that these improved the performance of the system. Misrepresentation has remained high. With the 2009 Hospital, Patients, Health and Territories Act physician participation in hospital governance receded. Decision-making powers and health units were re-concentrated to instill greater national coherence into the health system. BioMed Central 2014-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4271340/ /pubmed/25283813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-57 Text en © Simonet, D; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Simonet, Daniel
Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case
title Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case
title_full Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case
title_fullStr Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case
title_short Assessment of new public management in health care: the French case
title_sort assessment of new public management in health care: the french case
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4271340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-57
work_keys_str_mv AT simonetdaniel assessmentofnewpublicmanagementinhealthcarethefrenchcase