Cargando…

Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation

INTRODUCTION: Urethral injury is an uncommon surgical complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Conventional dogma requires abortion of the procedure if the adjacent corporal body is involved or delayed implantation to avert device infection associated with urinary extravasation. Besides the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anele, Uzoma A, Le, Brian V, Burnett, Arthur L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25548649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.44
_version_ 1782349689049317376
author Anele, Uzoma A
Le, Brian V
Burnett, Arthur L
author_facet Anele, Uzoma A
Le, Brian V
Burnett, Arthur L
author_sort Anele, Uzoma A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Urethral injury is an uncommon surgical complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Conventional dogma requires abortion of the procedure if the adjacent corporal body is involved or delayed implantation to avert device infection associated with urinary extravasation. Besides the setback of the aborted surgery, this management approach also presents the possible difficulty of encountering corporal fibrosis at the time of reoperation. AIM: We report an approach using primary urethral repair and temporary suprapubic cystostomy for the management of incidental urethral injuries in a cohort of patients allowing for successful completion of unaborted PP implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients receiving PPs from 1990 to 2014 in which incidental urethral injuries were repaired and PP implantation was completed with suprapubic cystostomy (suprapubic tube [SPT] insertion). After allowing for urethral healing and urinary diversion via SPT for 4–8 weeks, the PP was activated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful management was determined by the absence of perioperative complications within 6 months of implantation. RESULTS: We identified four cases, all receiving inflatable PPs, managed with temporary suprapubic cystostomy. These patients sustained urethral injuries during corporal dissection (one patient), corporal dilation (one patient), and penile straightening (two patients). All patients were managed safely and successfully. CONCLUSION: Primary urethral repair followed by temporary suprapubic cystostomy offers a surgical approach to complete PP implantation successfully in patients who sustain urethral injury complications, particularly for complex PP surgeries. Anele UA, Le BV, and Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4272249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42722492014-12-29 Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation Anele, Uzoma A Le, Brian V Burnett, Arthur L Sex Med Case Reports INTRODUCTION: Urethral injury is an uncommon surgical complication of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. Conventional dogma requires abortion of the procedure if the adjacent corporal body is involved or delayed implantation to avert device infection associated with urinary extravasation. Besides the setback of the aborted surgery, this management approach also presents the possible difficulty of encountering corporal fibrosis at the time of reoperation. AIM: We report an approach using primary urethral repair and temporary suprapubic cystostomy for the management of incidental urethral injuries in a cohort of patients allowing for successful completion of unaborted PP implantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients receiving PPs from 1990 to 2014 in which incidental urethral injuries were repaired and PP implantation was completed with suprapubic cystostomy (suprapubic tube [SPT] insertion). After allowing for urethral healing and urinary diversion via SPT for 4–8 weeks, the PP was activated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful management was determined by the absence of perioperative complications within 6 months of implantation. RESULTS: We identified four cases, all receiving inflatable PPs, managed with temporary suprapubic cystostomy. These patients sustained urethral injuries during corporal dissection (one patient), corporal dilation (one patient), and penile straightening (two patients). All patients were managed safely and successfully. CONCLUSION: Primary urethral repair followed by temporary suprapubic cystostomy offers a surgical approach to complete PP implantation successfully in patients who sustain urethral injury complications, particularly for complex PP surgeries. Anele UA, Le BV, and Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-12 2014-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4272249/ /pubmed/25548649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.44 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Sexual Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Sexual Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Anele, Uzoma A
Le, Brian V
Burnett, Arthur L
Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_fullStr Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_short Suprapubic Cystostomy for the Management of Urethral Injuries During Penile Prosthesis Implantation
title_sort suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25548649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.44
work_keys_str_mv AT aneleuzomaa suprapubiccystostomyforthemanagementofurethralinjuriesduringpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT lebrianv suprapubiccystostomyforthemanagementofurethralinjuriesduringpenileprosthesisimplantation
AT burnettarthurl suprapubiccystostomyforthemanagementofurethralinjuriesduringpenileprosthesisimplantation