Cargando…
Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT
INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Only complete resection of all gross disease with negative microscopic margins (R0 resection) provides a long-term survival benefit, and the overall 5-year relative survival rate is appro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.34-36 |
_version_ | 1782349719557636096 |
---|---|
author | Mehmedović, Amila Mesihović, Rusmir Saray, Aida Vanis, Nenad |
author_facet | Mehmedović, Amila Mesihović, Rusmir Saray, Aida Vanis, Nenad |
author_sort | Mehmedović, Amila |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Only complete resection of all gross disease with negative microscopic margins (R0 resection) provides a long-term survival benefit, and the overall 5-year relative survival rate is approximately 20%. To improve survival and quality of life, new therapeutic approaches have been introduced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 277 patients (171 men, 106 women) were included in this analysis. The results from the preoperative EUS and MDCT were compared to the postoperative pathological findings. A radial scanning ultrasonic endoscope was used. In patients with early gastric cancer, especially in cases confined to mucosa, endoscopic resection is performed to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. To achieve R0 resection for locally-advanced gastric cancer, neoadjuvant treatments have been investigated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to improve quality of life for both early and locally advanced gastric cancer. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which is considered to be the most precise method for locoregional staging, was commonly used for differentiating mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions. By contrast, computed tomography (CT) was used to detect the presence of distant metastasis. The difference in accuracy between the ≤20-mm group and other groups was statistically significant for both EUS and MDCT (P = 0.026 and P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION: However, recent technological advances with the helical and multi-detector scanners have provided better CT performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4272487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42724872015-01-07 Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT Mehmedović, Amila Mesihović, Rusmir Saray, Aida Vanis, Nenad Med Arch Original Article INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Only complete resection of all gross disease with negative microscopic margins (R0 resection) provides a long-term survival benefit, and the overall 5-year relative survival rate is approximately 20%. To improve survival and quality of life, new therapeutic approaches have been introduced. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 277 patients (171 men, 106 women) were included in this analysis. The results from the preoperative EUS and MDCT were compared to the postoperative pathological findings. A radial scanning ultrasonic endoscope was used. In patients with early gastric cancer, especially in cases confined to mucosa, endoscopic resection is performed to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. To achieve R0 resection for locally-advanced gastric cancer, neoadjuvant treatments have been investigated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to improve quality of life for both early and locally advanced gastric cancer. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), which is considered to be the most precise method for locoregional staging, was commonly used for differentiating mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions. By contrast, computed tomography (CT) was used to detect the presence of distant metastasis. The difference in accuracy between the ≤20-mm group and other groups was statistically significant for both EUS and MDCT (P = 0.026 and P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION: However, recent technological advances with the helical and multi-detector scanners have provided better CT performance. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-02-20 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4272487/ /pubmed/24783909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.34-36 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mehmedović, Amila Mesihović, Rusmir Saray, Aida Vanis, Nenad Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT |
title | Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT |
title_full | Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT |
title_fullStr | Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT |
title_short | Gastric Cancer Staging: EUS And CT |
title_sort | gastric cancer staging: eus and ct |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24783909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.34-36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehmedovicamila gastriccancerstagingeusandct AT mesihovicrusmir gastriccancerstagingeusandct AT sarayaida gastriccancerstagingeusandct AT vanisnenad gastriccancerstagingeusandct |