Cargando…

Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above

BACKGROUND: Artificial rupture of membranes (Amniotomy) is a common obstetric intervention. Its rates and indications had been subjected to criticism in medical literature. The current practices recommend to reduce its rate and keep the birthing process as natural as possible. AIM: This observationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Saadia, Zaheera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24937934
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.110-112
_version_ 1782349723342995456
author Saadia, Zaheera
author_facet Saadia, Zaheera
author_sort Saadia, Zaheera
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial rupture of membranes (Amniotomy) is a common obstetric intervention. Its rates and indications had been subjected to criticism in medical literature. The current practices recommend to reduce its rate and keep the birthing process as natural as possible. AIM: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of artificial rupture of membranes (Amniotomy) during normal labor and to determine if any significant differences existed between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above) on this obstetric interventions: artificial rupture of membranes (ARM). RESULTS: There were no PG participants with ruptured membranes whereas slightly more than half of the G2 and above participants (n = 88) had ruptured membranes. The most frequent cause for ARM was active management of latent phase of labor (PG n = 20 and G2 and above n = 9). Furthermore, slow progress of labor (PG n = 17 and G2 and above n = 7) and concerns with fetal heart rate (PG n = 13 and G2 and above n = 5) had the next highest number of occurrences. Results from the proportions tests revealed that there was one significant difference between gravidity groups on the frequency of APH (p =0.039). That is, G2 and above participants had amniotomy done for APH (5 of 32 = 15.63%) significantly more often than PG participants (4 of 89 = 4.49%). And although not statistically significant (p =0.084), there were 21 cases within the PG group where ARM was performed for no specific reason (21 of 89 = 23.6%) compared to three cases within the G2 and above group (3 of 32 = 9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although ARM is a commonly performed procedure during labor, there is not much difference between its indications between PG and G2 and above. The only significantly different indication was antepartum hemorrhage which was higher in G2 and above. Amniotomy was also performed without any clear indication in 26.4% of PG and 9.4% of G2 and above. Considering ARM as obstetric intervention efforts should be done to reduce its rates. There is a need for arranging normal labor workshops to revise the indications and reviewing the rates after these workshops to reduce the rates of ARM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4272504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42725042015-01-07 Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above Saadia, Zaheera Med Arch Original Paper BACKGROUND: Artificial rupture of membranes (Amniotomy) is a common obstetric intervention. Its rates and indications had been subjected to criticism in medical literature. The current practices recommend to reduce its rate and keep the birthing process as natural as possible. AIM: This observational study aimed to describe the rates and indicators for practice of artificial rupture of membranes (Amniotomy) during normal labor and to determine if any significant differences existed between women who have had one pregnancy (PG) and women who have already delivered two or more children (G2 and above) on this obstetric interventions: artificial rupture of membranes (ARM). RESULTS: There were no PG participants with ruptured membranes whereas slightly more than half of the G2 and above participants (n = 88) had ruptured membranes. The most frequent cause for ARM was active management of latent phase of labor (PG n = 20 and G2 and above n = 9). Furthermore, slow progress of labor (PG n = 17 and G2 and above n = 7) and concerns with fetal heart rate (PG n = 13 and G2 and above n = 5) had the next highest number of occurrences. Results from the proportions tests revealed that there was one significant difference between gravidity groups on the frequency of APH (p =0.039). That is, G2 and above participants had amniotomy done for APH (5 of 32 = 15.63%) significantly more often than PG participants (4 of 89 = 4.49%). And although not statistically significant (p =0.084), there were 21 cases within the PG group where ARM was performed for no specific reason (21 of 89 = 23.6%) compared to three cases within the G2 and above group (3 of 32 = 9.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although ARM is a commonly performed procedure during labor, there is not much difference between its indications between PG and G2 and above. The only significantly different indication was antepartum hemorrhage which was higher in G2 and above. Amniotomy was also performed without any clear indication in 26.4% of PG and 9.4% of G2 and above. Considering ARM as obstetric intervention efforts should be done to reduce its rates. There is a need for arranging normal labor workshops to revise the indications and reviewing the rates after these workshops to reduce the rates of ARM. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2014-04-22 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4272504/ /pubmed/24937934 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.110-112 Text en Copyright: © AVICENA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Saadia, Zaheera
Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above
title Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above
title_full Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above
title_fullStr Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above
title_full_unstemmed Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above
title_short Rates and Indicators for Amniotomy During Labor - a Descriptive Cross Sectional Study Between Primigravidas and Gravida 2 and Above
title_sort rates and indicators for amniotomy during labor - a descriptive cross sectional study between primigravidas and gravida 2 and above
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4272504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24937934
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.110-112
work_keys_str_mv AT saadiazaheera ratesandindicatorsforamniotomyduringlaboradescriptivecrosssectionalstudybetweenprimigravidasandgravida2andabove