Cargando…

Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty

OBJECTIVE: The epidural fluid collection (EFC) as a complication of cranioplasty is not well-described in the literature. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the development of EFC as a complication of cranioplasty, and its outcomes. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2012, 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seung pil, Kang, Dong Soo, Cheong, Jin Hwan, Kim, Jung Hee, Song, Kwan Young, Kong, Min Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25535519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.5.410
_version_ 1782349779110461440
author Kim, Seung pil
Kang, Dong Soo
Cheong, Jin Hwan
Kim, Jung Hee
Song, Kwan Young
Kong, Min Ho
author_facet Kim, Seung pil
Kang, Dong Soo
Cheong, Jin Hwan
Kim, Jung Hee
Song, Kwan Young
Kong, Min Ho
author_sort Kim, Seung pil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The epidural fluid collection (EFC) as a complication of cranioplasty is not well-described in the literature. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the development of EFC as a complication of cranioplasty, and its outcomes. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2012, 117 cranioplasty were performed in our institution. One-hundred-and-six of these patients were classified as either having EFC, or not having EFC. The two groups were compared to identify risk factors for EFC. Statistical significance was tested using the t-test and chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients undergoing cranioplasty, 59 (50.4%) suffered complications, and EFC occurred in 48 of the patients (41.0%). In the t-test and chi-test, risk factors for EFC were size of the skull defect (p=0.003) and postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space (p<0.001). In a logistic regression, the only statistically significant factor associated with development of EFC was the presence of postoperative air bubbles. The EFC disappeared or regressed over time in 30 of the 48 patients (62.5%), as shown by follow-up brain computed tomographic scan, but 17 patients (35.4%) required reoperation. CONCLUSION: EFC after cranioplasty is predicted by postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space. Most EFC can be treated conservatively. However, reoperation is necessary to resolve about a third of the cases. During cranioplasty, special attention is required when the skull defect is large, since EFC is then more likely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42730002014-12-22 Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty Kim, Seung pil Kang, Dong Soo Cheong, Jin Hwan Kim, Jung Hee Song, Kwan Young Kong, Min Ho J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: The epidural fluid collection (EFC) as a complication of cranioplasty is not well-described in the literature. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors for the development of EFC as a complication of cranioplasty, and its outcomes. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2012, 117 cranioplasty were performed in our institution. One-hundred-and-six of these patients were classified as either having EFC, or not having EFC. The two groups were compared to identify risk factors for EFC. Statistical significance was tested using the t-test and chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 117 patients undergoing cranioplasty, 59 (50.4%) suffered complications, and EFC occurred in 48 of the patients (41.0%). In the t-test and chi-test, risk factors for EFC were size of the skull defect (p=0.003) and postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space (p<0.001). In a logistic regression, the only statistically significant factor associated with development of EFC was the presence of postoperative air bubbles. The EFC disappeared or regressed over time in 30 of the 48 patients (62.5%), as shown by follow-up brain computed tomographic scan, but 17 patients (35.4%) required reoperation. CONCLUSION: EFC after cranioplasty is predicted by postoperative air bubbles in the epidural space. Most EFC can be treated conservatively. However, reoperation is necessary to resolve about a third of the cases. During cranioplasty, special attention is required when the skull defect is large, since EFC is then more likely. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2014-11 2014-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4273000/ /pubmed/25535519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.5.410 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Kim, Seung pil
Kang, Dong Soo
Cheong, Jin Hwan
Kim, Jung Hee
Song, Kwan Young
Kong, Min Ho
Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty
title Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty
title_full Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty
title_fullStr Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty
title_short Clinical Analysis of Epidural Fluid Collection as a Complication after Cranioplasty
title_sort clinical analysis of epidural fluid collection as a complication after cranioplasty
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25535519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.5.410
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseungpil clinicalanalysisofepiduralfluidcollectionasacomplicationaftercranioplasty
AT kangdongsoo clinicalanalysisofepiduralfluidcollectionasacomplicationaftercranioplasty
AT cheongjinhwan clinicalanalysisofepiduralfluidcollectionasacomplicationaftercranioplasty
AT kimjunghee clinicalanalysisofepiduralfluidcollectionasacomplicationaftercranioplasty
AT songkwanyoung clinicalanalysisofepiduralfluidcollectionasacomplicationaftercranioplasty
AT kongminho clinicalanalysisofepiduralfluidcollectionasacomplicationaftercranioplasty