Cargando…

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool has been widely embraced by the systematic review community, but several studies have reported that its reliability is low. We aim to investigate whether training of raters, including objective and standardized instructions on how to assess risk of bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	da Costa, Bruno R, Resta, Nina M, Beckett, Brooke, Israel-Stahre, Nicholas, Diaz, Alison, Johnston, Bradley C, Egger, Matthias, Jüni, Peter, Armijo-Olivo, Susan
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Protocol
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25495124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-144

Ejemplares similares

Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study
por: da Costa, Bruno R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

How should we evaluate the risk of bias of physical therapy trials?: a psychometric and meta-epidemiological approach towards developing guidelines for the design, conduct, and reporting of RCTs in Physical Therapy (PT) area: a study protocol
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Considerations from the risk of bias perspective for updating Cochrane reviews
por: Mayhew, Alain D., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Carrasco-Labra, Alonso, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Methodological Bias Can Lead the Cochrane Collaboration to Irrelevance in Public Health Decision-Making
por: Montresor, Antonio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Inter-rater reliability and validity of risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: a study protocol
por: Jeyaraman, Maya M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol
por: Ruano, Juan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups
por: Reid, Emma K, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Construct validity of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) quality scale for randomized trials: Item response theory and factor analyses
por: Albanese, Emiliano, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cochrane corner: beta-blockers for hypertension
por: Wiysonge, Charles S, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of “unclear” Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Rademaker, Maaike M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards
por: Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Alexander Cochran
Publicado: (1924)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Legenstein, Karin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Djukic, Dejan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Cameroon: bringing Cochrane to francophone sub-Saharan Africa
por: Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–2013
por: Saltaji, Humam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
por: Hansen, Julie B, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
por: Delaney, John, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A new paradigm shift in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: why we should exercise the brain?
por: Armijo-Olivo, Susan
Publicado: (2018)

James Duncan Cochran
Publicado: (1916)

William Cochrane Murray
Publicado: (1922)

Cochrane Corners in JMNI
por: Lyritis, George P., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cochrane Interactive Learning
por: Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
Publicado: (2018)

Dr. Jerome Cochran
Publicado: (1896)

Dr. Frank T. Cochran
Publicado: (1912)

De Graffe and Cochrane
Publicado: (1875)

Allegiance Bias and Treatment Quality as Moderators of the Effectiveness of Humanistic Psychotherapy: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Schünemann, Olivia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_afluhvmltg79hflls29kfg5lve