Cargando…

Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters

Treatment planning for breast cancer has been traditionally based on clinical landmarks. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) published consensus guidelines on contouring target volumes (TV) for the breast/chest wall and draining lymphatics. The effect of these guidelines on dosimetric parame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudra, Sonali, Al‐Hallaq, Hania A., Feng, Christine, Chmura, Steven J., Hasan, Yasmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4547
_version_ 1782349846949134336
author Rudra, Sonali
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
Feng, Christine
Chmura, Steven J.
Hasan, Yasmin
author_facet Rudra, Sonali
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
Feng, Christine
Chmura, Steven J.
Hasan, Yasmin
author_sort Rudra, Sonali
collection PubMed
description Treatment planning for breast cancer has been traditionally based on clinical landmarks. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) published consensus guidelines on contouring target volumes (TV) for the breast/chest wall and draining lymphatics. The effect of these guidelines on dosimetric parameters in surrounding organs at risk (OAR) and TVs is unknown. Fourteen patients treated with clinically derived plans from 2007‐2011 (Group I) and fourteen patients treated with target volume‐based plans from 2011‐2012 were selected for comparison (Group II). Treatment plans were constructed based on clinical landmarks (Group I) or TVs (Group II) to a median dose of 50.4 Gy to the breast/chest wall, axilla (Ax), supraclavicular (SCV), and internal mammary (IMN) lymph nodes. The RTOG TVs were then contoured in Group I patients by a single investigator blinded to the dose distributions. Dose‐volume histograms (DVH) were computed for the RTOG TVs and OARs in both groups, and DVH parameters were compared. In Group II, coverage improved for the SCV ([Formula: see text] versus 93.6%, [Formula: see text]) and intact breast ([Formula: see text] versus 99.3%, [Formula: see text]). The dose to the cord, the lung (V20Gy and V30Gy), and contralateral breast (V5Gy) were the same. Finally, the low dose to the heart and lung was decreased in Group II (heart [Formula: see text] versus 27.3%, [Formula: see text] , heart [Formula: see text] vs. 17.5%, [Formula: see text] , and ipsilateral lung [Formula: see text] vs. 69.3%, [Formula: see text]). Overall, our study supports that treatment planning using the RTOG consensus guidelines can improve coverage to certain target volumes compared to treatments based solely on clinical landmarks. Additionally, treatment planning using these target volumes does not increase dose to the contralateral breast, cord, heart, or lungs. Longer follow‐up is needed to determine if using these target volumes will affect clinical outcomes. PACS number: 87.55.dk
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42734982018-04-02 Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters Rudra, Sonali Al‐Hallaq, Hania A. Feng, Christine Chmura, Steven J. Hasan, Yasmin J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Treatment planning for breast cancer has been traditionally based on clinical landmarks. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) published consensus guidelines on contouring target volumes (TV) for the breast/chest wall and draining lymphatics. The effect of these guidelines on dosimetric parameters in surrounding organs at risk (OAR) and TVs is unknown. Fourteen patients treated with clinically derived plans from 2007‐2011 (Group I) and fourteen patients treated with target volume‐based plans from 2011‐2012 were selected for comparison (Group II). Treatment plans were constructed based on clinical landmarks (Group I) or TVs (Group II) to a median dose of 50.4 Gy to the breast/chest wall, axilla (Ax), supraclavicular (SCV), and internal mammary (IMN) lymph nodes. The RTOG TVs were then contoured in Group I patients by a single investigator blinded to the dose distributions. Dose‐volume histograms (DVH) were computed for the RTOG TVs and OARs in both groups, and DVH parameters were compared. In Group II, coverage improved for the SCV ([Formula: see text] versus 93.6%, [Formula: see text]) and intact breast ([Formula: see text] versus 99.3%, [Formula: see text]). The dose to the cord, the lung (V20Gy and V30Gy), and contralateral breast (V5Gy) were the same. Finally, the low dose to the heart and lung was decreased in Group II (heart [Formula: see text] versus 27.3%, [Formula: see text] , heart [Formula: see text] vs. 17.5%, [Formula: see text] , and ipsilateral lung [Formula: see text] vs. 69.3%, [Formula: see text]). Overall, our study supports that treatment planning using the RTOG consensus guidelines can improve coverage to certain target volumes compared to treatments based solely on clinical landmarks. Additionally, treatment planning using these target volumes does not increase dose to the contralateral breast, cord, heart, or lungs. Longer follow‐up is needed to determine if using these target volumes will affect clinical outcomes. PACS number: 87.55.dk John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4273498/ /pubmed/24710440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4547 Text en © 2014 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Rudra, Sonali
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
Feng, Christine
Chmura, Steven J.
Hasan, Yasmin
Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
title Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
title_full Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
title_fullStr Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
title_full_unstemmed Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
title_short Effect of RTOG breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
title_sort effect of rtog breast/chest wall guidelines on dose‐volume histogram parameters
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4547
work_keys_str_mv AT rudrasonali effectofrtogbreastchestwallguidelinesondosevolumehistogramparameters
AT alhallaqhaniaa effectofrtogbreastchestwallguidelinesondosevolumehistogramparameters
AT fengchristine effectofrtogbreastchestwallguidelinesondosevolumehistogramparameters
AT chmurastevenj effectofrtogbreastchestwallguidelinesondosevolumehistogramparameters
AT hasanyasmin effectofrtogbreastchestwallguidelinesondosevolumehistogramparameters