Cargando…

Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint

Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. To document the clinical utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion for patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction (as a direct result of sacroiliac joint disruptions or degenerati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Michael, Birkholz, Denise, MacBarb, Regina, Capobianco, Robyn, Woods, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25544898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/154041
_version_ 1782349857632026624
author Woods, Michael
Birkholz, Denise
MacBarb, Regina
Capobianco, Robyn
Woods, Adam
author_facet Woods, Michael
Birkholz, Denise
MacBarb, Regina
Capobianco, Robyn
Woods, Adam
author_sort Woods, Michael
collection PubMed
description Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. To document the clinical utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion for patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction (as a direct result of sacroiliac joint disruptions or degenerative sacroiliitis) and determine stimulated electromyography thresholds reflective of favorable implant position. Summary of Background Data. Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a well-accepted adjunct to minimally invasive pedicle screw placement. The utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion using a series of triangular, titanium porous plasma coated implants has not been evaluated. Methods. A medical chart review of consecutive patients treated with minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion was undertaken at a single center. Baseline patient demographics and medical history, intraoperative electromyography thresholds, and perioperative adverse events were collected after obtaining IRB approval. Results. 111 implants were placed in 37 patients. Sensitivity of EMG was 80% and specificity was 97%. Intraoperative neuromonitoring potentially avoided neurologic sequelae as a result of improper positioning in 7% of implants. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that intraoperative neuromonitoring may be a useful adjunct to minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion in avoiding nerve injury during implant placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42735832014-12-28 Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint Woods, Michael Birkholz, Denise MacBarb, Regina Capobianco, Robyn Woods, Adam Adv Orthop Clinical Study Study Design. Retrospective case series. Objective. To document the clinical utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion for patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction (as a direct result of sacroiliac joint disruptions or degenerative sacroiliitis) and determine stimulated electromyography thresholds reflective of favorable implant position. Summary of Background Data. Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a well-accepted adjunct to minimally invasive pedicle screw placement. The utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion using a series of triangular, titanium porous plasma coated implants has not been evaluated. Methods. A medical chart review of consecutive patients treated with minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion was undertaken at a single center. Baseline patient demographics and medical history, intraoperative electromyography thresholds, and perioperative adverse events were collected after obtaining IRB approval. Results. 111 implants were placed in 37 patients. Sensitivity of EMG was 80% and specificity was 97%. Intraoperative neuromonitoring potentially avoided neurologic sequelae as a result of improper positioning in 7% of implants. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that intraoperative neuromonitoring may be a useful adjunct to minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion in avoiding nerve injury during implant placement. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4273583/ /pubmed/25544898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/154041 Text en Copyright © 2014 Michael Woods et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Woods, Michael
Birkholz, Denise
MacBarb, Regina
Capobianco, Robyn
Woods, Adam
Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
title Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
title_full Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
title_fullStr Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
title_short Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint
title_sort utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring during minimally invasive fusion of the sacroiliac joint
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25544898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/154041
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsmichael utilityofintraoperativeneuromonitoringduringminimallyinvasivefusionofthesacroiliacjoint
AT birkholzdenise utilityofintraoperativeneuromonitoringduringminimallyinvasivefusionofthesacroiliacjoint
AT macbarbregina utilityofintraoperativeneuromonitoringduringminimallyinvasivefusionofthesacroiliacjoint
AT capobiancorobyn utilityofintraoperativeneuromonitoringduringminimallyinvasivefusionofthesacroiliacjoint
AT woodsadam utilityofintraoperativeneuromonitoringduringminimallyinvasivefusionofthesacroiliacjoint