Cargando…

Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility

Listening in noise is often perceived to be effortful. This is partly because cognitive resources are engaged in separating the target signal from background noise, leaving fewer resources for storage and processing of the content of the message in working memory. The Auditory Inference Span Test (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rönnberg, Niklas, Rudner, Mary, Lunner, Thomas, Stenfelt, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01490
_version_ 1782349864947941376
author Rönnberg, Niklas
Rudner, Mary
Lunner, Thomas
Stenfelt, Stefan
author_facet Rönnberg, Niklas
Rudner, Mary
Lunner, Thomas
Stenfelt, Stefan
author_sort Rönnberg, Niklas
collection PubMed
description Listening in noise is often perceived to be effortful. This is partly because cognitive resources are engaged in separating the target signal from background noise, leaving fewer resources for storage and processing of the content of the message in working memory. The Auditory Inference Span Test (AIST) is designed to assess listening effort by measuring the ability to maintain and process heard information. The aim of this study was to use AIST to investigate the effect of background noise types and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on listening effort, as a function of working memory capacity (WMC) and updating ability (UA). The AIST was administered in three types of background noise: steady-state speech-shaped noise, amplitude modulated speech-shaped noise, and unintelligible speech. Three SNRs targeting 90% speech intelligibility or better were used in each of the three noise types, giving nine different conditions. The reading span test assessed WMC, while UA was assessed with the letter memory test. Twenty young adults with normal hearing participated in the study. Results showed that AIST performance was not influenced by noise type at the same intelligibility level, but became worse with worse SNR when background noise was speech-like. Performance on AIST also decreased with increasing memory load level. Correlations between AIST performance and the cognitive measurements suggested that WMC is of more importance for listening when SNRs are worse, while UA is of more importance for listening in easier SNRs. The results indicated that in young adults with normal hearing, the effort involved in listening in noise at high intelligibility levels is independent of the noise type. However, when noise is speech-like and intelligibility decreases, listening effort increases, probably due to extra demands on cognitive resources added by the informational masking created by the speech fragments and vocal sounds in the background noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42736152015-01-06 Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility Rönnberg, Niklas Rudner, Mary Lunner, Thomas Stenfelt, Stefan Front Psychol Psychology Listening in noise is often perceived to be effortful. This is partly because cognitive resources are engaged in separating the target signal from background noise, leaving fewer resources for storage and processing of the content of the message in working memory. The Auditory Inference Span Test (AIST) is designed to assess listening effort by measuring the ability to maintain and process heard information. The aim of this study was to use AIST to investigate the effect of background noise types and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on listening effort, as a function of working memory capacity (WMC) and updating ability (UA). The AIST was administered in three types of background noise: steady-state speech-shaped noise, amplitude modulated speech-shaped noise, and unintelligible speech. Three SNRs targeting 90% speech intelligibility or better were used in each of the three noise types, giving nine different conditions. The reading span test assessed WMC, while UA was assessed with the letter memory test. Twenty young adults with normal hearing participated in the study. Results showed that AIST performance was not influenced by noise type at the same intelligibility level, but became worse with worse SNR when background noise was speech-like. Performance on AIST also decreased with increasing memory load level. Correlations between AIST performance and the cognitive measurements suggested that WMC is of more importance for listening when SNRs are worse, while UA is of more importance for listening in easier SNRs. The results indicated that in young adults with normal hearing, the effort involved in listening in noise at high intelligibility levels is independent of the noise type. However, when noise is speech-like and intelligibility decreases, listening effort increases, probably due to extra demands on cognitive resources added by the informational masking created by the speech fragments and vocal sounds in the background noise. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4273615/ /pubmed/25566159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01490 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rönnberg, Rudner, Lunner and Stenfelt. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Rönnberg, Niklas
Rudner, Mary
Lunner, Thomas
Stenfelt, Stefan
Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
title Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
title_full Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
title_fullStr Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
title_full_unstemmed Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
title_short Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
title_sort memory performance on the auditory inference span test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01490
work_keys_str_mv AT ronnbergniklas memoryperformanceontheauditoryinferencespantestisindependentofbackgroundnoisetypeforyoungadultswithnormalhearingathighspeechintelligibility
AT rudnermary memoryperformanceontheauditoryinferencespantestisindependentofbackgroundnoisetypeforyoungadultswithnormalhearingathighspeechintelligibility
AT lunnerthomas memoryperformanceontheauditoryinferencespantestisindependentofbackgroundnoisetypeforyoungadultswithnormalhearingathighspeechintelligibility
AT stenfeltstefan memoryperformanceontheauditoryinferencespantestisindependentofbackgroundnoisetypeforyoungadultswithnormalhearingathighspeechintelligibility