Cargando…

Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients with pneumonia, accurate microorganism identification allows appropriate antibiotic treatment. In patients undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), direct examination of the fluid using Gram staining provides prompt information but pathogen identification accur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baudel, Jean-Luc, Tankovic, Jacques, Dahoumane, Redouane, Carrat, Fabrice, Galbois, Arnaud, Ait-Oufella, Hafid, Offenstadt, Georges, Guidet, Bertrand, Maury, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0035-7
_version_ 1782349873743396864
author Baudel, Jean-Luc
Tankovic, Jacques
Dahoumane, Redouane
Carrat, Fabrice
Galbois, Arnaud
Ait-Oufella, Hafid
Offenstadt, Georges
Guidet, Bertrand
Maury, Eric
author_facet Baudel, Jean-Luc
Tankovic, Jacques
Dahoumane, Redouane
Carrat, Fabrice
Galbois, Arnaud
Ait-Oufella, Hafid
Offenstadt, Georges
Guidet, Bertrand
Maury, Eric
author_sort Baudel, Jean-Luc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients with pneumonia, accurate microorganism identification allows appropriate antibiotic treatment. In patients undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), direct examination of the fluid using Gram staining provides prompt information but pathogen identification accuracy is low. Culture of BAL fluid is actually the reference, but it is not available before 24 to 48 h. In addition, pathogen identification rate observed with direct examination and culture is decreased when antibiotic therapy has been given prior to sampling. We therefore assessed, in critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia, the performance of a multiplex PCR (MPCR) to identify pathogens in BAL fluid. This study is a prospective pilot observation. METHODS: We used a MPCR detecting 20 types of microorganisms. Direct examination, culture, and MPCR were performed on BAL fluid of critically ill patients with pneumonia suspicion. The final diagnosis of infective pneumonia was retained after the medical chart was reviewed by two experts. Pathogen identification rate of direct examination, culture, and MPCR in patients with confirmed pneumonia was compared. RESULTS: Among the 65 patients with pneumonia suspicion, the diagnosis of pneumonia was finally retained in 53 cases. Twenty nine (55%) were community-acquired pneumonia and 24 (45%) were hospital acquired. Pathogen identification rate with MPCR (66%) was greater than with culture (40%) and direct examination (23%) (p =0.01 and p <0.001, respectively). When considering only the microorganisms included in the MPCR panel, the pathogen identification rate provided by MPCR reached 82% and was still higher than with culture (35%, p <0.001) and direct examination (21%, p <0.001). Pathogen identification rate provided by MPCR was not modified in the case of previous antibiotic treatment (66% vs. 64%, NS) and was still better than with culture (23%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that in critically ill patients, MPCR performed on BAL fluid could provide higher identification rate of pathogens involved in pneumonia than direct examination and culture, especially in patients having received antimicrobial treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42736742015-01-15 Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study Baudel, Jean-Luc Tankovic, Jacques Dahoumane, Redouane Carrat, Fabrice Galbois, Arnaud Ait-Oufella, Hafid Offenstadt, Georges Guidet, Bertrand Maury, Eric Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients with pneumonia, accurate microorganism identification allows appropriate antibiotic treatment. In patients undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), direct examination of the fluid using Gram staining provides prompt information but pathogen identification accuracy is low. Culture of BAL fluid is actually the reference, but it is not available before 24 to 48 h. In addition, pathogen identification rate observed with direct examination and culture is decreased when antibiotic therapy has been given prior to sampling. We therefore assessed, in critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia, the performance of a multiplex PCR (MPCR) to identify pathogens in BAL fluid. This study is a prospective pilot observation. METHODS: We used a MPCR detecting 20 types of microorganisms. Direct examination, culture, and MPCR were performed on BAL fluid of critically ill patients with pneumonia suspicion. The final diagnosis of infective pneumonia was retained after the medical chart was reviewed by two experts. Pathogen identification rate of direct examination, culture, and MPCR in patients with confirmed pneumonia was compared. RESULTS: Among the 65 patients with pneumonia suspicion, the diagnosis of pneumonia was finally retained in 53 cases. Twenty nine (55%) were community-acquired pneumonia and 24 (45%) were hospital acquired. Pathogen identification rate with MPCR (66%) was greater than with culture (40%) and direct examination (23%) (p =0.01 and p <0.001, respectively). When considering only the microorganisms included in the MPCR panel, the pathogen identification rate provided by MPCR reached 82% and was still higher than with culture (35%, p <0.001) and direct examination (21%, p <0.001). Pathogen identification rate provided by MPCR was not modified in the case of previous antibiotic treatment (66% vs. 64%, NS) and was still better than with culture (23%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that in critically ill patients, MPCR performed on BAL fluid could provide higher identification rate of pathogens involved in pneumonia than direct examination and culture, especially in patients having received antimicrobial treatment. Springer 2014-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4273674/ /pubmed/25593751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0035-7 Text en Copyright © 2014 Baudel et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Baudel, Jean-Luc
Tankovic, Jacques
Dahoumane, Redouane
Carrat, Fabrice
Galbois, Arnaud
Ait-Oufella, Hafid
Offenstadt, Georges
Guidet, Bertrand
Maury, Eric
Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
title Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
title_full Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
title_fullStr Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
title_short Multiplex PCR performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
title_sort multiplex pcr performed of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid increases pathogen identification rate in critically ill patients with pneumonia: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0035-7
work_keys_str_mv AT baudeljeanluc multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT tankovicjacques multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT dahoumaneredouane multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT carratfabrice multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT galboisarnaud multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT aitoufellahafid multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT offenstadtgeorges multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT guidetbertrand multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy
AT mauryeric multiplexpcrperformedofbronchoalveolarlavagefluidincreasespathogenidentificationrateincriticallyillpatientswithpneumoniaapilotstudy