Cargando…

Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review

Supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) is used in a step-up approach when full enteral support is contraindicated or fails to reach caloric targets. Recent nutrition guidelines present divergent advices regarding timing of SPN in critically ill patients ranging from early SPN (<48 h after admiss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bost, Rianne BC, Tjan, Dave HT, van Zanten, Arthur RH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0031-y
_version_ 1782349875872006144
author Bost, Rianne BC
Tjan, Dave HT
van Zanten, Arthur RH
author_facet Bost, Rianne BC
Tjan, Dave HT
van Zanten, Arthur RH
author_sort Bost, Rianne BC
collection PubMed
description Supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) is used in a step-up approach when full enteral support is contraindicated or fails to reach caloric targets. Recent nutrition guidelines present divergent advices regarding timing of SPN in critically ill patients ranging from early SPN (<48 h after admission; EPN) to postponing initiation of SPN until day 8 after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (LPN). This systematic review summarizes results of prospective studies among adult ICU patients addressing the best timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition (S)PN. A structured PubMed search was conducted to identify eligible articles. Articles were screened and selected using predetermined criteria and appraised for relevance and validity. After critical appraisal, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two prospective observational studies remained. One RCT found a higher percentage of alive discharge from the ICU at day 8 in the LPN group compared to EPN group (p = 0.007) but no differences in ICU and in-hospital mortality. None of the other RCTs found differences in ICU or in-hospital mortality rates. Contradicting or divergent results on other secondary outcomes were found for ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, infection rates, nutrition targets, duration of mechanical ventilation, glucose control, duration of renal replacement therapy, muscle wasting and fat loss. Although the heterogeneity in quality and design of relevant studies precludes firm conclusions, it is reasonable to assume that in adult critically ill patients, there are no clinically relevant benefits of EPN compared with LPN with respect to morbidity or mortality end points, when full enteral support is contraindicated or fails to reach caloric targets. However, considering that infectious morbidity and resolution of organ failure may be negatively affected through mechanisms not yet clearly understood and acquisition costs of parenteral nutrition are higher, the early administration of parenteral nutrition cannot be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42736852015-01-15 Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review Bost, Rianne BC Tjan, Dave HT van Zanten, Arthur RH Ann Intensive Care Review Supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) is used in a step-up approach when full enteral support is contraindicated or fails to reach caloric targets. Recent nutrition guidelines present divergent advices regarding timing of SPN in critically ill patients ranging from early SPN (<48 h after admission; EPN) to postponing initiation of SPN until day 8 after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (LPN). This systematic review summarizes results of prospective studies among adult ICU patients addressing the best timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition (S)PN. A structured PubMed search was conducted to identify eligible articles. Articles were screened and selected using predetermined criteria and appraised for relevance and validity. After critical appraisal, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two prospective observational studies remained. One RCT found a higher percentage of alive discharge from the ICU at day 8 in the LPN group compared to EPN group (p = 0.007) but no differences in ICU and in-hospital mortality. None of the other RCTs found differences in ICU or in-hospital mortality rates. Contradicting or divergent results on other secondary outcomes were found for ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, infection rates, nutrition targets, duration of mechanical ventilation, glucose control, duration of renal replacement therapy, muscle wasting and fat loss. Although the heterogeneity in quality and design of relevant studies precludes firm conclusions, it is reasonable to assume that in adult critically ill patients, there are no clinically relevant benefits of EPN compared with LPN with respect to morbidity or mortality end points, when full enteral support is contraindicated or fails to reach caloric targets. However, considering that infectious morbidity and resolution of organ failure may be negatively affected through mechanisms not yet clearly understood and acquisition costs of parenteral nutrition are higher, the early administration of parenteral nutrition cannot be recommended. Springer 2014-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4273685/ /pubmed/25593747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0031-y Text en Copyright © 2014 Bost et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Bost, Rianne BC
Tjan, Dave HT
van Zanten, Arthur RH
Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
title Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
title_full Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
title_fullStr Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
title_short Timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
title_sort timing of (supplemental) parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0031-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bostriannebc timingofsupplementalparenteralnutritionincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreview
AT tjandaveht timingofsupplementalparenteralnutritionincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreview
AT vanzantenarthurrh timingofsupplementalparenteralnutritionincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreview