Cargando…

Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP), redefined as pain caused by a lesion or a disease of the somatosensory system, is a disabling condition that affects approximately two million Canadians. OBJECTIVE: To review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews related to the pharmacolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moulin, DE, Boulanger, A, Clark, AJ, Clarke, H, Dao, T, Finley, GA, Furlan, A, Gilron, I, Gordon, A, Morley-Forster, PK, Sessle, BJ, Squire, P, Stinson, J, Taenzer, P, Velly, A, Ware, MA, Weinberg, EL, Williamson, OD
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pulsus Group Inc 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479151
_version_ 1782349881877200896
author Moulin, DE
Boulanger, A
Clark, AJ
Clarke, H
Dao, T
Finley, GA
Furlan, A
Gilron, I
Gordon, A
Morley-Forster, PK
Sessle, BJ
Squire, P
Stinson, J
Taenzer, P
Velly, A
Ware, MA
Weinberg, EL
Williamson, OD
author_facet Moulin, DE
Boulanger, A
Clark, AJ
Clarke, H
Dao, T
Finley, GA
Furlan, A
Gilron, I
Gordon, A
Morley-Forster, PK
Sessle, BJ
Squire, P
Stinson, J
Taenzer, P
Velly, A
Ware, MA
Weinberg, EL
Williamson, OD
author_sort Moulin, DE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP), redefined as pain caused by a lesion or a disease of the somatosensory system, is a disabling condition that affects approximately two million Canadians. OBJECTIVE: To review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews related to the pharmacological management of NeP to develop a revised evidence-based consensus statement on its management. METHODS: RCTs, systematic reviews and existing guidelines on the pharmacological management of NeP were evaluated at a consensus meeting in May 2012 and updated until September 2013. Medications were recommended in the consensus statement if their analgesic efficacy was supported by at least one methodologically sound RCT (class I or class II) showing significant benefit relative to placebo or another relevant control group. Recommendations for treatment were based on the degree of evidence of analgesic efficacy, safety and ease of use. RESULTS: Analgesic agents recommended for first-line treatments are gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Tramadol and controlled-release opioid analgesics are recommended as second-line treatments for moderate to severe pain. Cannabinoids are now recommended as third-line treatments. Recommended fourth-line treatments include methadone, anticonvulsants with lesser evidence of efficacy (eg, lamotrigine, lacos-amide), tapentadol and botulinum toxin. There is support for some analgesic combinations in selected NeP conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide an updated, stepwise approach to the pharmacological management of NeP. Treatment should be individualized for each patient based on efficacy, side-effect profile and drug accessibility, including cost. Additional studies are required to examine head-to-head comparisons among analgesics, combinations of analgesics, long-term outcomes and treatment of pediatric, geriatric and central NeP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4273712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Pulsus Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42737122015-01-13 Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society Moulin, DE Boulanger, A Clark, AJ Clarke, H Dao, T Finley, GA Furlan, A Gilron, I Gordon, A Morley-Forster, PK Sessle, BJ Squire, P Stinson, J Taenzer, P Velly, A Ware, MA Weinberg, EL Williamson, OD Pain Res Manag Consensus Statement BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NeP), redefined as pain caused by a lesion or a disease of the somatosensory system, is a disabling condition that affects approximately two million Canadians. OBJECTIVE: To review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews related to the pharmacological management of NeP to develop a revised evidence-based consensus statement on its management. METHODS: RCTs, systematic reviews and existing guidelines on the pharmacological management of NeP were evaluated at a consensus meeting in May 2012 and updated until September 2013. Medications were recommended in the consensus statement if their analgesic efficacy was supported by at least one methodologically sound RCT (class I or class II) showing significant benefit relative to placebo or another relevant control group. Recommendations for treatment were based on the degree of evidence of analgesic efficacy, safety and ease of use. RESULTS: Analgesic agents recommended for first-line treatments are gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Tramadol and controlled-release opioid analgesics are recommended as second-line treatments for moderate to severe pain. Cannabinoids are now recommended as third-line treatments. Recommended fourth-line treatments include methadone, anticonvulsants with lesser evidence of efficacy (eg, lamotrigine, lacos-amide), tapentadol and botulinum toxin. There is support for some analgesic combinations in selected NeP conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide an updated, stepwise approach to the pharmacological management of NeP. Treatment should be individualized for each patient based on efficacy, side-effect profile and drug accessibility, including cost. Additional studies are required to examine head-to-head comparisons among analgesics, combinations of analgesics, long-term outcomes and treatment of pediatric, geriatric and central NeP. Pulsus Group Inc 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4273712/ /pubmed/25479151 Text en © 2014, Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact support@pulsus.com
spellingShingle Consensus Statement
Moulin, DE
Boulanger, A
Clark, AJ
Clarke, H
Dao, T
Finley, GA
Furlan, A
Gilron, I
Gordon, A
Morley-Forster, PK
Sessle, BJ
Squire, P
Stinson, J
Taenzer, P
Velly, A
Ware, MA
Weinberg, EL
Williamson, OD
Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society
title Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society
title_full Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society
title_fullStr Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society
title_short Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: Revised consensus statement from the Canadian Pain Society
title_sort pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain: revised consensus statement from the canadian pain society
topic Consensus Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25479151
work_keys_str_mv AT moulinde pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT boulangera pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT clarkaj pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT clarkeh pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT daot pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT finleyga pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT furlana pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT gilroni pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT gordona pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT morleyforsterpk pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT sesslebj pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT squirep pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT stinsonj pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT taenzerp pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT vellya pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT warema pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT weinbergel pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety
AT williamsonod pharmacologicalmanagementofchronicneuropathicpainrevisedconsensusstatementfromthecanadianpainsociety