Cargando…

Mechanisms and etiologies of thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: impact of extensive investigations

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is common in the intensive care unit. Potential mechanisms and etiologies behind this phenomenon are multiple and often entangled. We assessed the effect of a systematic approach, using routinely available tests, on the proportion of patients in whom the mechanism (prima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antier, Nadiejda, Quenot, Jean-Pierre, Doise, Jean-Marc, Noel, Robin, Demaistre, Emmanuel, Devilliers, Hervé
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4273722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0024-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is common in the intensive care unit. Potential mechanisms and etiologies behind this phenomenon are multiple and often entangled. We assessed the effect of a systematic approach, using routinely available tests, on the proportion of patients in whom the mechanism (primary objective) and etiology (secondary objective) of thrombocytopenia in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) could be identified. METHODS: Before-and-after study of all patients with thrombocytopenia was used. ‘Before’ group had no intervention. New standard operating procedures for thrombocytopenia management were introduced. In the ‘After’ group, bone marrow aspiration; determination of fibrinogen dosage, prothrombin time, factor V, D-dimers; assay of fibrin monomers, ferritin, triglycerides, lactic acid dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, vitamin B(12), folates, reticulocytes, haptoglobin, and bilirubin were performed. RESULTS: In the Before group (n = 20), the mechanism (central, peripheral, or mixed) was identified in 10 % versus 83% in After group (n = 23) (p < 0.001) (48% peripheral, 35% mixed). Before intervention, ≥1 etiology was identified in 15% versus 95.7% in the After group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic and extensive investigation using routine tests highlights the mechanisms and etiology of thrombocytopenia in most cases.