Cargando…
Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
The Danish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was established in 2006 and builds on data from Danish health registers. We validated the content of NDR, using full information from the Danish National Patient Register and data from the literature. Our study indicates that the completeness in NDR is ≥95...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565889 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S72768 |
_version_ | 1782349948867575808 |
---|---|
author | Green, Anders Sortsø, Camilla Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup Emneus, Martha |
author_facet | Green, Anders Sortsø, Camilla Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup Emneus, Martha |
author_sort | Green, Anders |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Danish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was established in 2006 and builds on data from Danish health registers. We validated the content of NDR, using full information from the Danish National Patient Register and data from the literature. Our study indicates that the completeness in NDR is ≥95% concerning ascertainment from data sources specific for diabetes, ie, prescriptions with antidiabetic drugs and diagnoses of diabetes in the National Patient Register. Since the NDR algorithm ignores diabetes-related hospital contacts terminated before 1990, the establishment of the date of inclusion is systematically delayed for ≥10% of the registrants in general and for ≥30% of the inclusions before 1997 in particular. This bias is enhanced for ascertainment by chiropody services and by frequent measurements of blood glucose because the date of reimbursement of services, rather than the date of encounter, has been taken as the date of inclusion in NDR. We also find that some 20% of the registrations in NDR may represent false positive inclusions of persons with frequent measurements of blood glucose without having diabetes. We conclude that NDR is a novel initiative to support research in the epidemiological and public health aspects of diabetes in Denmark, but we also present a list of recommended changes for improving validity, by reducing the impact of current sources of bias and misclassifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4274151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42741512015-01-06 Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register Green, Anders Sortsø, Camilla Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup Emneus, Martha Clin Epidemiol Original Research The Danish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was established in 2006 and builds on data from Danish health registers. We validated the content of NDR, using full information from the Danish National Patient Register and data from the literature. Our study indicates that the completeness in NDR is ≥95% concerning ascertainment from data sources specific for diabetes, ie, prescriptions with antidiabetic drugs and diagnoses of diabetes in the National Patient Register. Since the NDR algorithm ignores diabetes-related hospital contacts terminated before 1990, the establishment of the date of inclusion is systematically delayed for ≥10% of the registrants in general and for ≥30% of the inclusions before 1997 in particular. This bias is enhanced for ascertainment by chiropody services and by frequent measurements of blood glucose because the date of reimbursement of services, rather than the date of encounter, has been taken as the date of inclusion in NDR. We also find that some 20% of the registrations in NDR may represent false positive inclusions of persons with frequent measurements of blood glucose without having diabetes. We conclude that NDR is a novel initiative to support research in the epidemiological and public health aspects of diabetes in Denmark, but we also present a list of recommended changes for improving validity, by reducing the impact of current sources of bias and misclassifications. Dove Medical Press 2014-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4274151/ /pubmed/25565889 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S72768 Text en © 2015 Green et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Green, Anders Sortsø, Camilla Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup Emneus, Martha Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register |
title | Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register |
title_full | Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register |
title_short | Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register |
title_sort | validation of the danish national diabetes register |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565889 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S72768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenanders validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister AT sortsøcamilla validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister AT jensenpeterbjødstrup validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister AT emneusmartha validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister |