Cargando…

Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register

The Danish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was established in 2006 and builds on data from Danish health registers. We validated the content of NDR, using full information from the Danish National Patient Register and data from the literature. Our study indicates that the completeness in NDR is ≥95...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Anders, Sortsø, Camilla, Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup, Emneus, Martha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565889
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S72768
_version_ 1782349948867575808
author Green, Anders
Sortsø, Camilla
Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup
Emneus, Martha
author_facet Green, Anders
Sortsø, Camilla
Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup
Emneus, Martha
author_sort Green, Anders
collection PubMed
description The Danish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was established in 2006 and builds on data from Danish health registers. We validated the content of NDR, using full information from the Danish National Patient Register and data from the literature. Our study indicates that the completeness in NDR is ≥95% concerning ascertainment from data sources specific for diabetes, ie, prescriptions with antidiabetic drugs and diagnoses of diabetes in the National Patient Register. Since the NDR algorithm ignores diabetes-related hospital contacts terminated before 1990, the establishment of the date of inclusion is systematically delayed for ≥10% of the registrants in general and for ≥30% of the inclusions before 1997 in particular. This bias is enhanced for ascertainment by chiropody services and by frequent measurements of blood glucose because the date of reimbursement of services, rather than the date of encounter, has been taken as the date of inclusion in NDR. We also find that some 20% of the registrations in NDR may represent false positive inclusions of persons with frequent measurements of blood glucose without having diabetes. We conclude that NDR is a novel initiative to support research in the epidemiological and public health aspects of diabetes in Denmark, but we also present a list of recommended changes for improving validity, by reducing the impact of current sources of bias and misclassifications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42741512015-01-06 Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register Green, Anders Sortsø, Camilla Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup Emneus, Martha Clin Epidemiol Original Research The Danish National Diabetes Register (NDR) was established in 2006 and builds on data from Danish health registers. We validated the content of NDR, using full information from the Danish National Patient Register and data from the literature. Our study indicates that the completeness in NDR is ≥95% concerning ascertainment from data sources specific for diabetes, ie, prescriptions with antidiabetic drugs and diagnoses of diabetes in the National Patient Register. Since the NDR algorithm ignores diabetes-related hospital contacts terminated before 1990, the establishment of the date of inclusion is systematically delayed for ≥10% of the registrants in general and for ≥30% of the inclusions before 1997 in particular. This bias is enhanced for ascertainment by chiropody services and by frequent measurements of blood glucose because the date of reimbursement of services, rather than the date of encounter, has been taken as the date of inclusion in NDR. We also find that some 20% of the registrations in NDR may represent false positive inclusions of persons with frequent measurements of blood glucose without having diabetes. We conclude that NDR is a novel initiative to support research in the epidemiological and public health aspects of diabetes in Denmark, but we also present a list of recommended changes for improving validity, by reducing the impact of current sources of bias and misclassifications. Dove Medical Press 2014-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4274151/ /pubmed/25565889 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S72768 Text en © 2015 Green et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Green, Anders
Sortsø, Camilla
Jensen, Peter Bjødstrup
Emneus, Martha
Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
title Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
title_full Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
title_fullStr Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
title_short Validation of the Danish National Diabetes Register
title_sort validation of the danish national diabetes register
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565889
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S72768
work_keys_str_mv AT greenanders validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister
AT sortsøcamilla validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister
AT jensenpeterbjødstrup validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister
AT emneusmartha validationofthedanishnationaldiabetesregister