Cargando…

Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique

PURPOSE: Uncorrected refractive error remains a leading cause of visual impairment (VI) across the globe with Mozambique being no exception. The establishment of an optometry profession in Mozambique that is integrated into the public health system denotes significant progress with refractive servic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Stephen, Naidoo, Kovin, Gonzalez-Alvarez, Carmen, Harris, Geoff, Chinanayi, Farai, Loughman, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000431
_version_ 1782349960056930304
author Thompson, Stephen
Naidoo, Kovin
Gonzalez-Alvarez, Carmen
Harris, Geoff
Chinanayi, Farai
Loughman, James
author_facet Thompson, Stephen
Naidoo, Kovin
Gonzalez-Alvarez, Carmen
Harris, Geoff
Chinanayi, Farai
Loughman, James
author_sort Thompson, Stephen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Uncorrected refractive error remains a leading cause of visual impairment (VI) across the globe with Mozambique being no exception. The establishment of an optometry profession in Mozambique that is integrated into the public health system denotes significant progress with refractive services becoming available to the population. As the foundations of a comprehensive refractive service have now been established, this article seeks to understand what barriers may limit their uptake by the general population and inform decision making on improved service delivery. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study using two-stage cluster sampling was conducted. Participants with VI were asked to identify barriers that were reflective of their experiences and perceptions of accessing refractive services. A total of 4601 participants were enumerated from 76 clusters in Nampula, Mozambique. RESULTS: A total of 1087 visually impaired participants were identified (884 with near and 203 with distance impairment). Cost was the most frequently cited barrier, identified by more than one in every two participants (53%). Other barriers identified included lack of felt need (20%), distance to travel (15%), and lack of awareness (13%). In general, no significant influence of sex or type of VI on barrier selection was found. Location had a significant impact on the selection of several barriers. Pearson χ(2) analysis indicated that participants from rural areas were found to feel disadvantaged regarding the distance to services (p ≤ 0.001) and adequacy of hospital services (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For a comprehensive public sector refractive service to be successful in Mozambique, those planning its implementation must consider cost and affordability. A clear strategy for overcoming lack of felt need will also be needed, possibly in the form of improved advocacy and health promotion. The delivery of refractive services in more remote rural areas merits careful and comprehensive consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42743382014-12-24 Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique Thompson, Stephen Naidoo, Kovin Gonzalez-Alvarez, Carmen Harris, Geoff Chinanayi, Farai Loughman, James Optom Vis Sci Original Articles PURPOSE: Uncorrected refractive error remains a leading cause of visual impairment (VI) across the globe with Mozambique being no exception. The establishment of an optometry profession in Mozambique that is integrated into the public health system denotes significant progress with refractive services becoming available to the population. As the foundations of a comprehensive refractive service have now been established, this article seeks to understand what barriers may limit their uptake by the general population and inform decision making on improved service delivery. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional study using two-stage cluster sampling was conducted. Participants with VI were asked to identify barriers that were reflective of their experiences and perceptions of accessing refractive services. A total of 4601 participants were enumerated from 76 clusters in Nampula, Mozambique. RESULTS: A total of 1087 visually impaired participants were identified (884 with near and 203 with distance impairment). Cost was the most frequently cited barrier, identified by more than one in every two participants (53%). Other barriers identified included lack of felt need (20%), distance to travel (15%), and lack of awareness (13%). In general, no significant influence of sex or type of VI on barrier selection was found. Location had a significant impact on the selection of several barriers. Pearson χ(2) analysis indicated that participants from rural areas were found to feel disadvantaged regarding the distance to services (p ≤ 0.001) and adequacy of hospital services (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For a comprehensive public sector refractive service to be successful in Mozambique, those planning its implementation must consider cost and affordability. A clear strategy for overcoming lack of felt need will also be needed, possibly in the form of improved advocacy and health promotion. The delivery of refractive services in more remote rural areas merits careful and comprehensive consideration. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-01 2014-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4274338/ /pubmed/25379630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000431 Text en Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Optometry This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Thompson, Stephen
Naidoo, Kovin
Gonzalez-Alvarez, Carmen
Harris, Geoff
Chinanayi, Farai
Loughman, James
Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique
title Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique
title_full Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique
title_fullStr Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique
title_short Barriers to Use of Refractive Services in Mozambique
title_sort barriers to use of refractive services in mozambique
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000431
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonstephen barrierstouseofrefractiveservicesinmozambique
AT naidookovin barrierstouseofrefractiveservicesinmozambique
AT gonzalezalvarezcarmen barrierstouseofrefractiveservicesinmozambique
AT harrisgeoff barrierstouseofrefractiveservicesinmozambique
AT chinanayifarai barrierstouseofrefractiveservicesinmozambique
AT loughmanjames barrierstouseofrefractiveservicesinmozambique