Cargando…

Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas

Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that some apparently oligoxenous feather mite species are in fact monoxenous cryptic species with little morphological differentiation. In this study we analyzed two species, Zachvatkinia isolata (Avenzoariidae) and Alloptes (Sternalloptes) sterco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dabert, Miroslawa, Coulson, Stephen J., Gwiazdowicz, Dariusz J., Moe, Børge, Hanssen, Sveinn Are, Biersma, Elisabeth M., Pilskog, Hanne E., Dabert, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25342243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9856-1
_version_ 1782349964106530816
author Dabert, Miroslawa
Coulson, Stephen J.
Gwiazdowicz, Dariusz J.
Moe, Børge
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Pilskog, Hanne E.
Dabert, Jacek
author_facet Dabert, Miroslawa
Coulson, Stephen J.
Gwiazdowicz, Dariusz J.
Moe, Børge
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Pilskog, Hanne E.
Dabert, Jacek
author_sort Dabert, Miroslawa
collection PubMed
description Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that some apparently oligoxenous feather mite species are in fact monoxenous cryptic species with little morphological differentiation. In this study we analyzed two species, Zachvatkinia isolata (Avenzoariidae) and Alloptes (Sternalloptes) stercorarii (Alloptidae) which prefer different parts of the plumage of two sister species of birds: arctic skua (Stercorarius parasiticus) and long-tailed skua (S. longicaudus) breeding on tundra in the High Arctic archipelago of Svalbard. Given that there are no reports about hybridization events between the host species, we expected that both skuas would have a species-specific acarofauna. The genetic distances among DNA-barcode sequences (COI and 28S rDNA), phylogenetic tree topologies, and haplotype networks of the COI sequences of mites suggested extensive gene flow in Z. isolata between and within populations inhabiting both skua species, whereas the Alloptes populations were host specific and sufficiently genetically separated as to warrant species-level status. The discrepancy in the genetic structure of Alloptes and Zachvatkinia populations suggests frequent but transient contacts between the two skua species in which the probability of mite exchange is much higher for Zachvatkinia, which is present in high numbers and inhabits exposed parts of primary flight feathers, than for the less abundant Alloptes that lives primarily in more protected and inaccessible parts of the plumage. We discuss the possible nature of these contacts between host species and the area(s) where they might take place. The star-like structures in the haplotype network as well as high haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity observed in Z. isolata are concordant with the known dispersal strategy of feather mites: vertical colonization of new host individuals followed by rapid growth of founder populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10493-014-9856-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42743742014-12-24 Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas Dabert, Miroslawa Coulson, Stephen J. Gwiazdowicz, Dariusz J. Moe, Børge Hanssen, Sveinn Are Biersma, Elisabeth M. Pilskog, Hanne E. Dabert, Jacek Exp Appl Acarol Article Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed that some apparently oligoxenous feather mite species are in fact monoxenous cryptic species with little morphological differentiation. In this study we analyzed two species, Zachvatkinia isolata (Avenzoariidae) and Alloptes (Sternalloptes) stercorarii (Alloptidae) which prefer different parts of the plumage of two sister species of birds: arctic skua (Stercorarius parasiticus) and long-tailed skua (S. longicaudus) breeding on tundra in the High Arctic archipelago of Svalbard. Given that there are no reports about hybridization events between the host species, we expected that both skuas would have a species-specific acarofauna. The genetic distances among DNA-barcode sequences (COI and 28S rDNA), phylogenetic tree topologies, and haplotype networks of the COI sequences of mites suggested extensive gene flow in Z. isolata between and within populations inhabiting both skua species, whereas the Alloptes populations were host specific and sufficiently genetically separated as to warrant species-level status. The discrepancy in the genetic structure of Alloptes and Zachvatkinia populations suggests frequent but transient contacts between the two skua species in which the probability of mite exchange is much higher for Zachvatkinia, which is present in high numbers and inhabits exposed parts of primary flight feathers, than for the less abundant Alloptes that lives primarily in more protected and inaccessible parts of the plumage. We discuss the possible nature of these contacts between host species and the area(s) where they might take place. The star-like structures in the haplotype network as well as high haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity observed in Z. isolata are concordant with the known dispersal strategy of feather mites: vertical colonization of new host individuals followed by rapid growth of founder populations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10493-014-9856-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-24 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4274374/ /pubmed/25342243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9856-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Dabert, Miroslawa
Coulson, Stephen J.
Gwiazdowicz, Dariusz J.
Moe, Børge
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Biersma, Elisabeth M.
Pilskog, Hanne E.
Dabert, Jacek
Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
title Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
title_full Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
title_fullStr Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
title_full_unstemmed Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
title_short Differences in speciation progress in feather mites (Analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of Zachvatkinia and Alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
title_sort differences in speciation progress in feather mites (analgoidea) inhabiting the same host: the case of zachvatkinia and alloptes living on arctic and long-tailed skuas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25342243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-014-9856-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dabertmiroslawa differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT coulsonstephenj differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT gwiazdowiczdariuszj differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT moebørge differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT hanssensveinnare differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT biersmaelisabethm differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT pilskoghannee differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas
AT dabertjacek differencesinspeciationprogressinfeathermitesanalgoideainhabitingthesamehostthecaseofzachvatkiniaandallopteslivingonarcticandlongtailedskuas