Cargando…

Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage

INTRODUCTION: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a diagnostic procedure by which cells and other components from bronchial and alveolar spaces are obtained for various studies. One of the main advantages of BAL is that it can be done as a day care procedure. Material obtained by BAL can give a definite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radha, Sistla, Afroz, Tameem, Prasad, Sudheer, Ravindra, Nallagonda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538381
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.145636
_version_ 1782349991225851904
author Radha, Sistla
Afroz, Tameem
Prasad, Sudheer
Ravindra, Nallagonda
author_facet Radha, Sistla
Afroz, Tameem
Prasad, Sudheer
Ravindra, Nallagonda
author_sort Radha, Sistla
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a diagnostic procedure by which cells and other components from bronchial and alveolar spaces are obtained for various studies. One of the main advantages of BAL is that it can be done as a day care procedure. Material obtained by BAL can give a definite diagnosis in conditions such as infections and malignancies. AIMS: The aims and objective of this study were to assess the utility of BAL as a diagnostic tool to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the material obtained from BAL in various infections and neoplastic lesions to study the limitations of BAL in certain lung disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done in a tertiary care center in Hyderabad. Bronchoscopy was done as an outpatient procedure and lavage fluid obtained analyzed. This is a prospective study done from January 2012 to Jun 2013. Ninety-one BALs were analyzed for total and differential count, microbiological examination and cytological evaluation. Cases selected included nonresolving pneumonias, diffuse lung infiltrates, infiltrates in immunosuppressed hosts and ventilator-associated pneumonias. RESULTS: Bronchoalveolar lavage was done in 91 cases over a period of 1½ years. Definite diagnosis was not given in 7 cases. Four cases were inadequate. Tuberculosis was diagnosed in 22 cases, fungal infections in 7 cases. Thirty-eight cases of bacterial pneumonias were diagnosed, Klebsiella was the most common organism. Malignancy was diagnosed in 13 cases. CONCLUSION: Definite diagnosis can be made in tuberculosis, fungal infections, bacterial pneumonias and in malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42745232014-12-23 Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage Radha, Sistla Afroz, Tameem Prasad, Sudheer Ravindra, Nallagonda J Cytol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a diagnostic procedure by which cells and other components from bronchial and alveolar spaces are obtained for various studies. One of the main advantages of BAL is that it can be done as a day care procedure. Material obtained by BAL can give a definite diagnosis in conditions such as infections and malignancies. AIMS: The aims and objective of this study were to assess the utility of BAL as a diagnostic tool to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the material obtained from BAL in various infections and neoplastic lesions to study the limitations of BAL in certain lung disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done in a tertiary care center in Hyderabad. Bronchoscopy was done as an outpatient procedure and lavage fluid obtained analyzed. This is a prospective study done from January 2012 to Jun 2013. Ninety-one BALs were analyzed for total and differential count, microbiological examination and cytological evaluation. Cases selected included nonresolving pneumonias, diffuse lung infiltrates, infiltrates in immunosuppressed hosts and ventilator-associated pneumonias. RESULTS: Bronchoalveolar lavage was done in 91 cases over a period of 1½ years. Definite diagnosis was not given in 7 cases. Four cases were inadequate. Tuberculosis was diagnosed in 22 cases, fungal infections in 7 cases. Thirty-eight cases of bacterial pneumonias were diagnosed, Klebsiella was the most common organism. Malignancy was diagnosed in 13 cases. CONCLUSION: Definite diagnosis can be made in tuberculosis, fungal infections, bacterial pneumonias and in malignancies. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4274523/ /pubmed/25538381 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.145636 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Radha, Sistla
Afroz, Tameem
Prasad, Sudheer
Ravindra, Nallagonda
Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
title Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
title_full Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
title_short Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
title_sort diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25538381
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.145636
work_keys_str_mv AT radhasistla diagnosticutilityofbronchoalveolarlavage
AT afroztameem diagnosticutilityofbronchoalveolarlavage
AT prasadsudheer diagnosticutilityofbronchoalveolarlavage
AT ravindranallagonda diagnosticutilityofbronchoalveolarlavage