Cargando…

A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation

BACKGROUND: The ion transport stoichiometry (q) of electrogenic transporters is an important determinant of their function. q can be determined by the reversal potential (E(rev)) if the transporter under study is the only electrogenic transport mechanism or a specific inhibitor is available. An alte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Xuesi M, Kao, Liyo, Kurtz, Ira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13628-014-0014-2
_version_ 1782350026295476224
author Shao, Xuesi M
Kao, Liyo
Kurtz, Ira
author_facet Shao, Xuesi M
Kao, Liyo
Kurtz, Ira
author_sort Shao, Xuesi M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ion transport stoichiometry (q) of electrogenic transporters is an important determinant of their function. q can be determined by the reversal potential (E(rev)) if the transporter under study is the only electrogenic transport mechanism or a specific inhibitor is available. An alternative approach is to calculate delta reversal potential (ΔE(rev)) by altering the concentrations of the transported substrates. This approach is based on the hypothesis that the contributions of other channels and transporters on the membrane to E(rev) are additive. However, E(rev) is a complicated function of the sum of different conductances rather than being additive. RESULTS: We propose a new delta current (ΔI) method based on a simplified model for electrogenic secondary active transport by Heinz (Electrical Potentials in Biological Membrane Transport, 1981). ΔI is the difference between two currents obtained from altering the external concentration of a transported substrate thereby eliminating other currents without the need for a specific inhibitor. q is determined by the ratio of ΔI at two different membrane voltages (V(1) and V(2)) where q = 2RT/(F(V(2) –V(1)))ln(ΔI(2)/ΔI(1)) + 1. We tested this ΔI methodology in HEK-293 cells expressing the elctrogenic SLC4 sodium bicarbonate cotransporters NBCe2-C and NBCe1-A, the results were consistent with those obtained with the E(rev) inhibitor method. Furthermore, using computational simulations, we compared the estimates of q with the ΔE(rev) and ΔI methods. The results showed that the ΔE(rev) method introduces significant error when other channels or electrogenic transporters are present on the membrane and that the ΔI equation accurately calculates the stoichiometric ratio. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a ΔI method for estimating transport stoichiometry of electrogenic transporters based on the Heinz model. This model reduces to the conventional reversal potential method when the transporter under study is the only electrogenic transport process in the membrane. When there are other electrogenic transport pathways, ΔI method eliminates their contribution in estimating q. Computational simulations demonstrated that the ΔE(rev) method introduces significant error when other channels or electrogenic transporters are present and that the ΔI equation accurately calculates the stoichiometric ratio. This new ΔI method can be readily extended to the analysis of other electrogenic transporters in other tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42747212015-01-02 A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation Shao, Xuesi M Kao, Liyo Kurtz, Ira BMC Biophys Methodology Article BACKGROUND: The ion transport stoichiometry (q) of electrogenic transporters is an important determinant of their function. q can be determined by the reversal potential (E(rev)) if the transporter under study is the only electrogenic transport mechanism or a specific inhibitor is available. An alternative approach is to calculate delta reversal potential (ΔE(rev)) by altering the concentrations of the transported substrates. This approach is based on the hypothesis that the contributions of other channels and transporters on the membrane to E(rev) are additive. However, E(rev) is a complicated function of the sum of different conductances rather than being additive. RESULTS: We propose a new delta current (ΔI) method based on a simplified model for electrogenic secondary active transport by Heinz (Electrical Potentials in Biological Membrane Transport, 1981). ΔI is the difference between two currents obtained from altering the external concentration of a transported substrate thereby eliminating other currents without the need for a specific inhibitor. q is determined by the ratio of ΔI at two different membrane voltages (V(1) and V(2)) where q = 2RT/(F(V(2) –V(1)))ln(ΔI(2)/ΔI(1)) + 1. We tested this ΔI methodology in HEK-293 cells expressing the elctrogenic SLC4 sodium bicarbonate cotransporters NBCe2-C and NBCe1-A, the results were consistent with those obtained with the E(rev) inhibitor method. Furthermore, using computational simulations, we compared the estimates of q with the ΔE(rev) and ΔI methods. The results showed that the ΔE(rev) method introduces significant error when other channels or electrogenic transporters are present on the membrane and that the ΔI equation accurately calculates the stoichiometric ratio. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a ΔI method for estimating transport stoichiometry of electrogenic transporters based on the Heinz model. This model reduces to the conventional reversal potential method when the transporter under study is the only electrogenic transport process in the membrane. When there are other electrogenic transport pathways, ΔI method eliminates their contribution in estimating q. Computational simulations demonstrated that the ΔE(rev) method introduces significant error when other channels or electrogenic transporters are present and that the ΔI equation accurately calculates the stoichiometric ratio. This new ΔI method can be readily extended to the analysis of other electrogenic transporters in other tissues. BioMed Central 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4274721/ /pubmed/25558372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13628-014-0014-2 Text en © Shao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Shao, Xuesi M
Kao, Liyo
Kurtz, Ira
A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
title A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
title_full A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
title_fullStr A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
title_full_unstemmed A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
title_short A novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
title_sort novel delta current method for transport stoichiometry estimation
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13628-014-0014-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoxuesim anoveldeltacurrentmethodfortransportstoichiometryestimation
AT kaoliyo anoveldeltacurrentmethodfortransportstoichiometryestimation
AT kurtzira anoveldeltacurrentmethodfortransportstoichiometryestimation
AT shaoxuesim noveldeltacurrentmethodfortransportstoichiometryestimation
AT kaoliyo noveldeltacurrentmethodfortransportstoichiometryestimation
AT kurtzira noveldeltacurrentmethodfortransportstoichiometryestimation