Cargando…

Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics

The detection of visual motion requires temporal delays to compare current with earlier visual input. Models of motion detection assume that these delays reside in separate classes of slow and fast thalamic cells, or slow and fast synaptic transmission. We used a data-driven modeling approach to gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joukes, Jeroen, Hartmann, Till S., Krekelberg, Bart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00239
_version_ 1782350061700644864
author Joukes, Jeroen
Hartmann, Till S.
Krekelberg, Bart
author_facet Joukes, Jeroen
Hartmann, Till S.
Krekelberg, Bart
author_sort Joukes, Jeroen
collection PubMed
description The detection of visual motion requires temporal delays to compare current with earlier visual input. Models of motion detection assume that these delays reside in separate classes of slow and fast thalamic cells, or slow and fast synaptic transmission. We used a data-driven modeling approach to generate a model that instead uses recurrent network dynamics with a single, fixed temporal integration window to implement the velocity computation. This model successfully reproduced the temporal response dynamics of a population of motion sensitive neurons in macaque middle temporal area (MT) and its constituent parts matched many of the properties found in the motion processing pathway (e.g., Gabor-like receptive fields (RFs), simple and complex cells, spatially asymmetric excitation and inhibition). Reverse correlation analysis revealed that a simplified network based on first and second order space-time correlations of the recurrent model behaved much like a feedforward motion energy (ME) model. The feedforward model, however, failed to capture the full speed tuning and direction selectivity properties based on higher than second order space-time correlations typically found in MT. These findings support the idea that recurrent network connectivity can create temporal delays to compute velocity. Moreover, the model explains why the motion detection system often behaves like a feedforward ME network, even though the anatomical evidence strongly suggests that this network should be dominated by recurrent feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42749072015-01-06 Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics Joukes, Jeroen Hartmann, Till S. Krekelberg, Bart Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience The detection of visual motion requires temporal delays to compare current with earlier visual input. Models of motion detection assume that these delays reside in separate classes of slow and fast thalamic cells, or slow and fast synaptic transmission. We used a data-driven modeling approach to generate a model that instead uses recurrent network dynamics with a single, fixed temporal integration window to implement the velocity computation. This model successfully reproduced the temporal response dynamics of a population of motion sensitive neurons in macaque middle temporal area (MT) and its constituent parts matched many of the properties found in the motion processing pathway (e.g., Gabor-like receptive fields (RFs), simple and complex cells, spatially asymmetric excitation and inhibition). Reverse correlation analysis revealed that a simplified network based on first and second order space-time correlations of the recurrent model behaved much like a feedforward motion energy (ME) model. The feedforward model, however, failed to capture the full speed tuning and direction selectivity properties based on higher than second order space-time correlations typically found in MT. These findings support the idea that recurrent network connectivity can create temporal delays to compute velocity. Moreover, the model explains why the motion detection system often behaves like a feedforward ME network, even though the anatomical evidence strongly suggests that this network should be dominated by recurrent feedback. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4274907/ /pubmed/25565992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00239 Text en Copyright © 2014 Joukes, Hartmann and Krekelberg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Joukes, Jeroen
Hartmann, Till S.
Krekelberg, Bart
Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
title Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
title_full Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
title_fullStr Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
title_short Motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
title_sort motion detection based on recurrent network dynamics
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00239
work_keys_str_mv AT joukesjeroen motiondetectionbasedonrecurrentnetworkdynamics
AT hartmanntills motiondetectionbasedonrecurrentnetworkdynamics
AT krekelbergbart motiondetectionbasedonrecurrentnetworkdynamics