Cargando…

No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Primary motor cortex (M1) excitability can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and can be modulated by a conditioning electrical stimulus delivered to a peripheral nerve prior to TMS. This is known as afferent facilitation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine whether AF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kojima, Sho, Onishi, Hideaki, Sugawara, Kazuhiro, Miyaguchi, Shota, Kirimoto, Hikari, Tamaki, Hiroyuki, Shirozu, Hiroshi, Kameyama, Shigeki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01023
_version_ 1782350070696378368
author Kojima, Sho
Onishi, Hideaki
Sugawara, Kazuhiro
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Shirozu, Hiroshi
Kameyama, Shigeki
author_facet Kojima, Sho
Onishi, Hideaki
Sugawara, Kazuhiro
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Shirozu, Hiroshi
Kameyama, Shigeki
author_sort Kojima, Sho
collection PubMed
description Primary motor cortex (M1) excitability can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and can be modulated by a conditioning electrical stimulus delivered to a peripheral nerve prior to TMS. This is known as afferent facilitation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine whether AF can be induced by digital nerve stimulation and to evaluate the relation between the interstimulus interval (ISI) required for AF and the latency of the E2 component of the cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR) and the prominent somatosensory evoked field (SEF) deflection that occurs approximately 70 ms after digital nerve stimulation (P60m). Stimulation of the digital nerve of the right index finger was followed, at various time intervals, by single-pulse TMS applied to the contralateral hemisphere. The ISI between digital nerve stimulation and TMS was 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 140, 180, 200, or 220 ms. Single-pulse TMS was performed alone as a control. SEFs were recorded following digital nerve stimulation of the index finger, and the equivalent current dipole of prominent deflections that occurred around 70 ms after the stimulation was calculated. CMRs were recorded following digital nerve stimulation during muscle contraction. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were facilitated at an ISI between 50 and 100 ms in 11 of 13 subjects, and the facilitated MEP amplitude was larger than the unconditioned MEP amplitude (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the ISI at which AF was maximal and the latency of the P60m component of the SEF (r = −0.50, p = 0.12) or the E2 component of the CMR (r = −0.54, p = 0.88). These results indicate that the precise ISI required for AF cannot be predicted using SEF or CMR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4274984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42749842015-01-06 No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields Kojima, Sho Onishi, Hideaki Sugawara, Kazuhiro Miyaguchi, Shota Kirimoto, Hikari Tamaki, Hiroyuki Shirozu, Hiroshi Kameyama, Shigeki Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Primary motor cortex (M1) excitability can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and can be modulated by a conditioning electrical stimulus delivered to a peripheral nerve prior to TMS. This is known as afferent facilitation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine whether AF can be induced by digital nerve stimulation and to evaluate the relation between the interstimulus interval (ISI) required for AF and the latency of the E2 component of the cutaneomuscular reflex (CMR) and the prominent somatosensory evoked field (SEF) deflection that occurs approximately 70 ms after digital nerve stimulation (P60m). Stimulation of the digital nerve of the right index finger was followed, at various time intervals, by single-pulse TMS applied to the contralateral hemisphere. The ISI between digital nerve stimulation and TMS was 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 140, 180, 200, or 220 ms. Single-pulse TMS was performed alone as a control. SEFs were recorded following digital nerve stimulation of the index finger, and the equivalent current dipole of prominent deflections that occurred around 70 ms after the stimulation was calculated. CMRs were recorded following digital nerve stimulation during muscle contraction. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were facilitated at an ISI between 50 and 100 ms in 11 of 13 subjects, and the facilitated MEP amplitude was larger than the unconditioned MEP amplitude (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the ISI at which AF was maximal and the latency of the P60m component of the SEF (r = −0.50, p = 0.12) or the E2 component of the CMR (r = −0.54, p = 0.88). These results indicate that the precise ISI required for AF cannot be predicted using SEF or CMR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4274984/ /pubmed/25566038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01023 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kojima, Onishi, Sugawara, Miyaguchi, Kirimoto, Tamaki, Shirozu and Kameyama. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kojima, Sho
Onishi, Hideaki
Sugawara, Kazuhiro
Miyaguchi, Shota
Kirimoto, Hikari
Tamaki, Hiroyuki
Shirozu, Hiroshi
Kameyama, Shigeki
No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
title No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
title_full No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
title_fullStr No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
title_full_unstemmed No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
title_short No relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
title_sort no relation between afferent facilitation induced by digital nerve stimulation and the latency of cutaneomuscular reflexes and somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4274984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01023
work_keys_str_mv AT kojimasho norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT onishihideaki norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT sugawarakazuhiro norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT miyaguchishota norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT kirimotohikari norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT tamakihiroyuki norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT shirozuhiroshi norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields
AT kameyamashigeki norelationbetweenafferentfacilitationinducedbydigitalnervestimulationandthelatencyofcutaneomuscularreflexesandsomatosensoryevokedmagneticfields