Cargando…

Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries

BACKGROUND: The synthesis of published research in systematic reviews is essential when providing evidence to inform clinical and health policy decision-making. However, the validity of systematic reviews is threatened if journal publications represent a biased selection of all studies that have bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Schmucker, Christine, Schell, Lisa K., Portalupi, Susan, Oeller, Patrick, Cabrera, Laura, Bassler, Dirk, Schwarzer, Guido, Scherer, Roberta W., Antes, Gerd, von Elm, Erik, Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25536072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114023

Ejemplares similares

Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics
por: Portalupi, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research
por: Schmucker, Christine M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Premature Discontinuation of Prospective Clinical Studies Approved by a Research Ethics Committee – A Comparison of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Fate of Clinical Research Studies after Ethical Approval – Follow-Up of Study Protocols until Publication
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
por: Mueller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Correction: Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus
por: Bassler, Dirk, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
por: Müller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees
por: Bain, Luchuo Engelbert
Publicado: (2017)

Informed consent and ethics committee approval in laboratory medicine
por: Borovecki, Ana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Post-approval process: A challenge for ethics committees
por: Halwai, Aarti, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Specialist palliative care services for adults with advanced, incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings—protocol for a systematic review
por: Gaertner, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How to get ethics committee approval for clinical trials in Turkey?
por: Ilbars, Hilal, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting ethics committee approval and informed consent: Review of an Ayurvedic journal
por: Bolshete, Pravin M.
Publicado: (2015)

Monitoring of approved studies: A difficult tightrope walk by Ethics Committees
por: Davis, Sanish
Publicado: (2018)

Local Research Ethics Committees’ Approval in a National Population Study
por: Busby, Araceli, et al.
Publicado: (1998)

Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol
por: Briel, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Tamoxifen for the management of breast events induced by non-steroidal antiandrogens in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Approval from the ethics committee in published studies from the Indian Journal of Psychiatry
por: Praharaj, Samir Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of specialist palliative care services on quality of life in adults with advanced incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Gaertner, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Ethics Approval
por: Ross, W M
Publicado: (1994)

Ethics approval fees constrain early career researchers in Africa: a call for alternative financing for ethics committees
por: Baluku, Joseph Baruch, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An audit of the approval letters issued by Drugs Controller General of India to Ethics Committees in India
por: Bhide, Shruti S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cochrane Collaboration Systematic Reviews may be based on trials not approved by a research ethics committee
por: Jokstad, Asbjørn
Publicado: (2017)

Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Ethics committee minutes: Heart of ethics committee quality
por: Bhatt, Arun
Publicado: (2016)

The demise of the randomised controlled trial: bibliometric study of the German-language health care literature, 1948 to 2004
por: Galandi, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Team members perspectives on conflicts in clinical ethics committees
por: Scherer, Anika, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Ethics Review Committee approval and informed consent: an analysis of biomedical publications originating from Sri Lanka
por: Sumathipala, Athula, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The Ethics of National Ethics Committees
por: Harris, John
Publicado: (1994)

Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Is it easy to be an Ethics Committee member? (Experiences as an Ethics Committee member)
por: Chaturvedi, Santosh K.
Publicado: (2017)

Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines
por: Strode, A E, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Committee on publication ethics
por: Singh, Jatinder
Publicado: (2010)

Ethics committee composition
por: Bhatt, Arun
Publicado: (2012)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_1fpij40ekpnleddcpda51j3kls