Cargando…
Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is clinically heterogeneous; intra and extrahepatic CCA have diverse clinical presentations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology may identify the genetic differences between these entities and identify molecular subgroups for targeted therapeutics. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25536104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115383 |
_version_ | 1782350100281950208 |
---|---|
author | Churi, Chaitanya R. Shroff, Rachna Wang, Ying Rashid, Asif Kang, HyunSeon C. Weatherly, Jacqueline Zuo, Mingxin Zinner, Ralph Hong, David Meric-Bernstam, Funda Janku, Filip Crane, Christopher H. Mishra, Lopa Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas Wolff, Robert A. Mills, Gordon Javle, Milind |
author_facet | Churi, Chaitanya R. Shroff, Rachna Wang, Ying Rashid, Asif Kang, HyunSeon C. Weatherly, Jacqueline Zuo, Mingxin Zinner, Ralph Hong, David Meric-Bernstam, Funda Janku, Filip Crane, Christopher H. Mishra, Lopa Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas Wolff, Robert A. Mills, Gordon Javle, Milind |
author_sort | Churi, Chaitanya R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is clinically heterogeneous; intra and extrahepatic CCA have diverse clinical presentations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology may identify the genetic differences between these entities and identify molecular subgroups for targeted therapeutics. METHODS: We describe successful NGS-based testing of 75 CCA patients along with the prognostic and therapeutic implications of findings. Mutation profiling was performed using either a) NGS panel of hotspot regions in 46 cancer-related genes using a 318-chip on Ion PGM Sequencer or b) Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform for 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes to an average depth of 1000X. Clinical data was abstracted and correlated with clinical outcome. Patients with targetable mutations were referred to appropriate clinical trials. RESULTS: There were significant differences between intrahepatic (n = 55) and extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) in regard to the nature and frequency of the genetic aberrations (GAs). IDH1 and DNA repair gene alterations occurred more frequently in intrahepatic CCA, while ERBB2 GAs occurred in the extrahepatic group. Commonly occurring GAs in intrahepatic CCA were TP53 (35%), KRAS (24%), ARID1A (20%), IDH1 (18%), MCL1 (16%) and PBRM1 (11%). Most frequent GAs in extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) were TP53 (45%), KRAS (40%), ERBB2 (25%), SMAD4 (25%), FBXW7 (15%) and CDKN2A (15%). In intrahepatic CCA, KRAS, TP53 or MAPK/mTOR GAs were significantly associated with a worse prognosis while FGFR GAs correlated with a relatively indolent disease course. IDH1 GAs did not have any prognostic significance. GAs in the chromatin modulating genes, BAP1 and PBRM1 were associated with bone metastases and worse survival in extrahepatic CCA. Radiologic responses and clinical benefit was noted with EGFR, FGFR, C-met, B-RAF and MEK inhibitors. CONCLUSION: There are significant genetic differences between intra and extrahepatic CCA. NGS can potentially identify disease subsets with distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4275227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42752272014-12-31 Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications Churi, Chaitanya R. Shroff, Rachna Wang, Ying Rashid, Asif Kang, HyunSeon C. Weatherly, Jacqueline Zuo, Mingxin Zinner, Ralph Hong, David Meric-Bernstam, Funda Janku, Filip Crane, Christopher H. Mishra, Lopa Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas Wolff, Robert A. Mills, Gordon Javle, Milind PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is clinically heterogeneous; intra and extrahepatic CCA have diverse clinical presentations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology may identify the genetic differences between these entities and identify molecular subgroups for targeted therapeutics. METHODS: We describe successful NGS-based testing of 75 CCA patients along with the prognostic and therapeutic implications of findings. Mutation profiling was performed using either a) NGS panel of hotspot regions in 46 cancer-related genes using a 318-chip on Ion PGM Sequencer or b) Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform for 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes to an average depth of 1000X. Clinical data was abstracted and correlated with clinical outcome. Patients with targetable mutations were referred to appropriate clinical trials. RESULTS: There were significant differences between intrahepatic (n = 55) and extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) in regard to the nature and frequency of the genetic aberrations (GAs). IDH1 and DNA repair gene alterations occurred more frequently in intrahepatic CCA, while ERBB2 GAs occurred in the extrahepatic group. Commonly occurring GAs in intrahepatic CCA were TP53 (35%), KRAS (24%), ARID1A (20%), IDH1 (18%), MCL1 (16%) and PBRM1 (11%). Most frequent GAs in extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) were TP53 (45%), KRAS (40%), ERBB2 (25%), SMAD4 (25%), FBXW7 (15%) and CDKN2A (15%). In intrahepatic CCA, KRAS, TP53 or MAPK/mTOR GAs were significantly associated with a worse prognosis while FGFR GAs correlated with a relatively indolent disease course. IDH1 GAs did not have any prognostic significance. GAs in the chromatin modulating genes, BAP1 and PBRM1 were associated with bone metastases and worse survival in extrahepatic CCA. Radiologic responses and clinical benefit was noted with EGFR, FGFR, C-met, B-RAF and MEK inhibitors. CONCLUSION: There are significant genetic differences between intra and extrahepatic CCA. NGS can potentially identify disease subsets with distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications. Public Library of Science 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4275227/ /pubmed/25536104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115383 Text en © 2014 Churi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Churi, Chaitanya R. Shroff, Rachna Wang, Ying Rashid, Asif Kang, HyunSeon C. Weatherly, Jacqueline Zuo, Mingxin Zinner, Ralph Hong, David Meric-Bernstam, Funda Janku, Filip Crane, Christopher H. Mishra, Lopa Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas Wolff, Robert A. Mills, Gordon Javle, Milind Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications |
title | Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications |
title_full | Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications |
title_fullStr | Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications |
title_short | Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications |
title_sort | mutation profiling in cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25536104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT churichaitanyar mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT shroffrachna mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT wangying mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT rashidasif mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT kanghyunseonc mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT weatherlyjacqueline mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT zuomingxin mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT zinnerralph mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT hongdavid mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT mericbernstamfunda mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT jankufilip mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT cranechristopherh mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT mishralopa mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT vautheyjeannicholas mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT wolffroberta mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT millsgordon mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications AT javlemilind mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications |