Cargando…

Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is clinically heterogeneous; intra and extrahepatic CCA have diverse clinical presentations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology may identify the genetic differences between these entities and identify molecular subgroups for targeted therapeutics. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Churi, Chaitanya R., Shroff, Rachna, Wang, Ying, Rashid, Asif, Kang, HyunSeon C., Weatherly, Jacqueline, Zuo, Mingxin, Zinner, Ralph, Hong, David, Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Janku, Filip, Crane, Christopher H., Mishra, Lopa, Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas, Wolff, Robert A., Mills, Gordon, Javle, Milind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25536104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115383
_version_ 1782350100281950208
author Churi, Chaitanya R.
Shroff, Rachna
Wang, Ying
Rashid, Asif
Kang, HyunSeon C.
Weatherly, Jacqueline
Zuo, Mingxin
Zinner, Ralph
Hong, David
Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Janku, Filip
Crane, Christopher H.
Mishra, Lopa
Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas
Wolff, Robert A.
Mills, Gordon
Javle, Milind
author_facet Churi, Chaitanya R.
Shroff, Rachna
Wang, Ying
Rashid, Asif
Kang, HyunSeon C.
Weatherly, Jacqueline
Zuo, Mingxin
Zinner, Ralph
Hong, David
Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Janku, Filip
Crane, Christopher H.
Mishra, Lopa
Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas
Wolff, Robert A.
Mills, Gordon
Javle, Milind
author_sort Churi, Chaitanya R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is clinically heterogeneous; intra and extrahepatic CCA have diverse clinical presentations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology may identify the genetic differences between these entities and identify molecular subgroups for targeted therapeutics. METHODS: We describe successful NGS-based testing of 75 CCA patients along with the prognostic and therapeutic implications of findings. Mutation profiling was performed using either a) NGS panel of hotspot regions in 46 cancer-related genes using a 318-chip on Ion PGM Sequencer or b) Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform for 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes to an average depth of 1000X. Clinical data was abstracted and correlated with clinical outcome. Patients with targetable mutations were referred to appropriate clinical trials. RESULTS: There were significant differences between intrahepatic (n = 55) and extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) in regard to the nature and frequency of the genetic aberrations (GAs). IDH1 and DNA repair gene alterations occurred more frequently in intrahepatic CCA, while ERBB2 GAs occurred in the extrahepatic group. Commonly occurring GAs in intrahepatic CCA were TP53 (35%), KRAS (24%), ARID1A (20%), IDH1 (18%), MCL1 (16%) and PBRM1 (11%). Most frequent GAs in extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) were TP53 (45%), KRAS (40%), ERBB2 (25%), SMAD4 (25%), FBXW7 (15%) and CDKN2A (15%). In intrahepatic CCA, KRAS, TP53 or MAPK/mTOR GAs were significantly associated with a worse prognosis while FGFR GAs correlated with a relatively indolent disease course. IDH1 GAs did not have any prognostic significance. GAs in the chromatin modulating genes, BAP1 and PBRM1 were associated with bone metastases and worse survival in extrahepatic CCA. Radiologic responses and clinical benefit was noted with EGFR, FGFR, C-met, B-RAF and MEK inhibitors. CONCLUSION: There are significant genetic differences between intra and extrahepatic CCA. NGS can potentially identify disease subsets with distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4275227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42752272014-12-31 Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications Churi, Chaitanya R. Shroff, Rachna Wang, Ying Rashid, Asif Kang, HyunSeon C. Weatherly, Jacqueline Zuo, Mingxin Zinner, Ralph Hong, David Meric-Bernstam, Funda Janku, Filip Crane, Christopher H. Mishra, Lopa Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas Wolff, Robert A. Mills, Gordon Javle, Milind PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is clinically heterogeneous; intra and extrahepatic CCA have diverse clinical presentations. Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology may identify the genetic differences between these entities and identify molecular subgroups for targeted therapeutics. METHODS: We describe successful NGS-based testing of 75 CCA patients along with the prognostic and therapeutic implications of findings. Mutation profiling was performed using either a) NGS panel of hotspot regions in 46 cancer-related genes using a 318-chip on Ion PGM Sequencer or b) Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform for 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes to an average depth of 1000X. Clinical data was abstracted and correlated with clinical outcome. Patients with targetable mutations were referred to appropriate clinical trials. RESULTS: There were significant differences between intrahepatic (n = 55) and extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) in regard to the nature and frequency of the genetic aberrations (GAs). IDH1 and DNA repair gene alterations occurred more frequently in intrahepatic CCA, while ERBB2 GAs occurred in the extrahepatic group. Commonly occurring GAs in intrahepatic CCA were TP53 (35%), KRAS (24%), ARID1A (20%), IDH1 (18%), MCL1 (16%) and PBRM1 (11%). Most frequent GAs in extrahepatic CCA (n = 20) were TP53 (45%), KRAS (40%), ERBB2 (25%), SMAD4 (25%), FBXW7 (15%) and CDKN2A (15%). In intrahepatic CCA, KRAS, TP53 or MAPK/mTOR GAs were significantly associated with a worse prognosis while FGFR GAs correlated with a relatively indolent disease course. IDH1 GAs did not have any prognostic significance. GAs in the chromatin modulating genes, BAP1 and PBRM1 were associated with bone metastases and worse survival in extrahepatic CCA. Radiologic responses and clinical benefit was noted with EGFR, FGFR, C-met, B-RAF and MEK inhibitors. CONCLUSION: There are significant genetic differences between intra and extrahepatic CCA. NGS can potentially identify disease subsets with distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications. Public Library of Science 2014-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4275227/ /pubmed/25536104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115383 Text en © 2014 Churi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Churi, Chaitanya R.
Shroff, Rachna
Wang, Ying
Rashid, Asif
Kang, HyunSeon C.
Weatherly, Jacqueline
Zuo, Mingxin
Zinner, Ralph
Hong, David
Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Janku, Filip
Crane, Christopher H.
Mishra, Lopa
Vauthey, Jean-Nicholas
Wolff, Robert A.
Mills, Gordon
Javle, Milind
Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
title Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
title_full Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
title_fullStr Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
title_full_unstemmed Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
title_short Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications
title_sort mutation profiling in cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic and therapeutic implications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25536104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115383
work_keys_str_mv AT churichaitanyar mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT shroffrachna mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT wangying mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT rashidasif mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT kanghyunseonc mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT weatherlyjacqueline mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT zuomingxin mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT zinnerralph mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT hongdavid mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT mericbernstamfunda mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT jankufilip mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT cranechristopherh mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT mishralopa mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT vautheyjeannicholas mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT wolffroberta mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT millsgordon mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications
AT javlemilind mutationprofilingincholangiocarcinomaprognosticandtherapeuticimplications