Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in non-cardiological critically ill patients. There are as many as 20 million cases of sepsis annually worldwide, with a mortality rate of around 35%. It has been reported that the dysregulation of haemostatic system due to the interaction betwe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25534216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006770 |
_version_ | 1782350166983966720 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Libing Jiang, Shouyin Feng, Xia Ma, Yuefeng Zhang, Mao |
author_facet | Jiang, Libing Jiang, Shouyin Feng, Xia Ma, Yuefeng Zhang, Mao |
author_sort | Jiang, Libing |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in non-cardiological critically ill patients. There are as many as 20 million cases of sepsis annually worldwide, with a mortality rate of around 35%. It has been reported that the dysregulation of haemostatic system due to the interaction between coagulation system and inflammatory response is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with severe sepsis. In this context, several anticoagulants have been evaluated in recent years. However, the results of these studies were inconsistent and even contradictory. In addition, there is insufficient evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants. The purpose of our study is to carry out a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants for severe sepsis based on existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and ranking these anticoagulants for practical consideration. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases will be systematically searched for eligible studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) on anticoagulant therapy for severe sepsis with multiple outcome measures will be included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes are mortality and bleeding events. The secondary outcomes include the length of intensive care stay, the length of hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Direct pairwise meta-analysis (DMA), indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis (ITC) and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to compare different anticoagulants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required given that this is a protocol for a systematic review. The protocol of this systematic review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) under registration number CRD42014013886. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4275679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42756792014-12-31 The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Jiang, Libing Jiang, Shouyin Feng, Xia Ma, Yuefeng Zhang, Mao BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in non-cardiological critically ill patients. There are as many as 20 million cases of sepsis annually worldwide, with a mortality rate of around 35%. It has been reported that the dysregulation of haemostatic system due to the interaction between coagulation system and inflammatory response is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with severe sepsis. In this context, several anticoagulants have been evaluated in recent years. However, the results of these studies were inconsistent and even contradictory. In addition, there is insufficient evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants. The purpose of our study is to carry out a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants for severe sepsis based on existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and ranking these anticoagulants for practical consideration. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases will be systematically searched for eligible studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) on anticoagulant therapy for severe sepsis with multiple outcome measures will be included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes are mortality and bleeding events. The secondary outcomes include the length of intensive care stay, the length of hospital stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Direct pairwise meta-analysis (DMA), indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis (ITC) and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to compare different anticoagulants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required given that this is a protocol for a systematic review. The protocol of this systematic review will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) under registration number CRD42014013886. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4275679/ /pubmed/25534216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006770 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Jiang, Libing Jiang, Shouyin Feng, Xia Ma, Yuefeng Zhang, Mao The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title | The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of different anticoagulants on patients with severe sepsis and derangement of coagulation: a protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25534216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006770 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianglibing theefficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT jiangshouyin theefficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT fengxia theefficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT mayuefeng theefficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT zhangmao theefficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT jianglibing efficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT jiangshouyin efficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT fengxia efficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT mayuefeng efficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT zhangmao efficacyandsafetyofdifferentanticoagulantsonpatientswithseveresepsisandderangementofcoagulationaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |