Cargando…
A usability study of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of two formats of a shortened systematic review for clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Usability of the prototypes was assessed using three cycles of iterative testing. 10 participants were asked to complete tasks of locating information...
Autores principales: | Perrier, Laure, Kealey, M Ryan, Straus, Sharon E |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005919 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians
por: Perrier, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability: a study protocol
por: Marcilly, Romaric, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Protocol for a scoping review of patient–clinician digital health interventions for the population with hip fracture
por: Backman, Chantal, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach
por: Ghorayeb, Abir, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis
por: Malhotra, Karan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)