Cargando…

A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most common laparoscopic surgery performed by general surgeons. Although being a routine procedure, classical pitfalls shall be regarded, as misperception of intraoperative anatomy is one of the leading causes of bile duct injuries. The “critical vie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dziodzio, Tomasz, Weiss, Sascha, Sucher, Robert, Pratschke, Johann, Biebl, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25437680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.11.018
_version_ 1782350188938002432
author Dziodzio, Tomasz
Weiss, Sascha
Sucher, Robert
Pratschke, Johann
Biebl, Matthias
author_facet Dziodzio, Tomasz
Weiss, Sascha
Sucher, Robert
Pratschke, Johann
Biebl, Matthias
author_sort Dziodzio, Tomasz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most common laparoscopic surgery performed by general surgeons. Although being a routine procedure, classical pitfalls shall be regarded, as misperception of intraoperative anatomy is one of the leading causes of bile duct injuries. The “critical view of safety” in laparoscopic cholecystectomy serves the unequivocal identification of the cystic duct before transection. The aim of this manuscript is to discuss classical pitfalls and bile duct injury avoiding strategies in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, by presenting an interesting case report. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 71-year-old patient, who previously suffered from a biliary pancreatitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP with stone extraction. The intraoperative situs showed a shrunken gallbladder. After placement of four trocars, the gall bladder was grasped in the usual way at the fundus and pulled in the right upper abdomen. Following the dissection of the triangle of Calot, a “critical view of safety” was established. As dissection continued, it however soon became clear that instead of the cystic duct, the common bile duct had been dissected. In order to create an overview, the gallbladder was thereafter mobilized fundus first and further preparation resumed carefully to expose the cystic duct and the common bile duct. Consecutively the operation could be completed in the usual way. DISCUSSION: Despite permanent increase in learning curves and new approaches in laparoscopic techniques, bile duct injuries still remain twice as frequent as in the conventional open approach. In the case presented, transection of the common bile duct was prevented through critical examination of the present anatomy. The “critical view of safety” certainly offers not a full protection to avoid biliary lesions, but may lead to a significant risk minimization when consistently implemented. CONCLUSION: A sufficient mobilization of the gallbladder from its bed is essential in performing a critical view in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4275857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42758572014-12-28 A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy! Dziodzio, Tomasz Weiss, Sascha Sucher, Robert Pratschke, Johann Biebl, Matthias Int J Surg Case Rep Article INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most common laparoscopic surgery performed by general surgeons. Although being a routine procedure, classical pitfalls shall be regarded, as misperception of intraoperative anatomy is one of the leading causes of bile duct injuries. The “critical view of safety” in laparoscopic cholecystectomy serves the unequivocal identification of the cystic duct before transection. The aim of this manuscript is to discuss classical pitfalls and bile duct injury avoiding strategies in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, by presenting an interesting case report. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 71-year-old patient, who previously suffered from a biliary pancreatitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP with stone extraction. The intraoperative situs showed a shrunken gallbladder. After placement of four trocars, the gall bladder was grasped in the usual way at the fundus and pulled in the right upper abdomen. Following the dissection of the triangle of Calot, a “critical view of safety” was established. As dissection continued, it however soon became clear that instead of the cystic duct, the common bile duct had been dissected. In order to create an overview, the gallbladder was thereafter mobilized fundus first and further preparation resumed carefully to expose the cystic duct and the common bile duct. Consecutively the operation could be completed in the usual way. DISCUSSION: Despite permanent increase in learning curves and new approaches in laparoscopic techniques, bile duct injuries still remain twice as frequent as in the conventional open approach. In the case presented, transection of the common bile duct was prevented through critical examination of the present anatomy. The “critical view of safety” certainly offers not a full protection to avoid biliary lesions, but may lead to a significant risk minimization when consistently implemented. CONCLUSION: A sufficient mobilization of the gallbladder from its bed is essential in performing a critical view in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Elsevier 2014-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4275857/ /pubmed/25437680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.11.018 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dziodzio, Tomasz
Weiss, Sascha
Sucher, Robert
Pratschke, Johann
Biebl, Matthias
A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
title A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
title_full A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
title_fullStr A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
title_full_unstemmed A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
title_short A ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
title_sort ‘critical view’ on a classical pitfall in laparoscopic cholecystectomy!
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4275857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25437680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.11.018
work_keys_str_mv AT dziodziotomasz acriticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT weisssascha acriticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT sucherrobert acriticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT pratschkejohann acriticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT bieblmatthias acriticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT dziodziotomasz criticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT weisssascha criticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT sucherrobert criticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT pratschkejohann criticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT bieblmatthias criticalviewonaclassicalpitfallinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy