Cargando…
Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) versus subcutaneous placebo (PBO-SC) was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the BREVACTA study. METHODS: Patients (n = 656) were randomized...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24942540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22384 |
_version_ | 1782350235908964352 |
---|---|
author | Kivitz, Alan Olech, Ewa Borofsky, Michael Zazueta, Beatriz M Navarro-Sarabia, Federico Radominski, Sebastião C Merrill, Joan T Rowell, Lucy Nasmyth-Miller, Clare Bao, Min Wright, Stephen Pope, Janet E |
author_facet | Kivitz, Alan Olech, Ewa Borofsky, Michael Zazueta, Beatriz M Navarro-Sarabia, Federico Radominski, Sebastião C Merrill, Joan T Rowell, Lucy Nasmyth-Miller, Clare Bao, Min Wright, Stephen Pope, Janet E |
author_sort | Kivitz, Alan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) versus subcutaneous placebo (PBO-SC) was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the BREVACTA study. METHODS: Patients (n = 656) were randomized 2:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg every other week or PBO-SC every other week for 24 weeks; 20% previously received anti–tumor necrosis factor treatment. Escape therapy with TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly was offered from week 12 for inadequate response. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 24. The key secondary outcomes were radiographic progression and safety. RESULTS: TCZ-SC was superior to PBO-SC for ACR20 response at week 24 (60.9% versus 31.5%; P < 0.0001). All secondary end points showed TCZ-SC to be superior to PBO-SC, including ACR50 and ACR70 response (40% and 20% for TCZ-SC, respectively, and 12% and 5% for PBO-SC, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) remission (DAS28 <2.6; 32% versus 4% [P < 0.0001]). The mean change in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score was significantly lower in the TCZ-SC group than the PBO-SC group (0.62 versus 1.23; P = 0.0149). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were comparable between the TCZ-SC and PBO-SC groups; 4.6% and 3.7% of patients had at least 1 SAE, respectively, and infection was the most common SAE in 2.1% and 1.8% of patients, respectively. More injection site reactions occurred with TCZ-SC than PBO-SC (7.1% versus 4.1%). No anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity reactions occurred. There were 3 deaths in the TCZ-SC group and 0 in the PBO-SC group. CONCLUSION: TCZ-SC every other week had significantly greater efficacy, including ACR end points and inhibition of joint damage, compared with PBO-SC. TCZ-SC was well tolerated and its safety profile was comparable with that of previous intravenous TCZ studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4276289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42762892014-12-29 Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Kivitz, Alan Olech, Ewa Borofsky, Michael Zazueta, Beatriz M Navarro-Sarabia, Federico Radominski, Sebastião C Merrill, Joan T Rowell, Lucy Nasmyth-Miller, Clare Bao, Min Wright, Stephen Pope, Janet E Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) versus subcutaneous placebo (PBO-SC) was evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the BREVACTA study. METHODS: Patients (n = 656) were randomized 2:1 to receive TCZ-SC 162 mg every other week or PBO-SC every other week for 24 weeks; 20% previously received anti–tumor necrosis factor treatment. Escape therapy with TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly was offered from week 12 for inadequate response. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response at week 24. The key secondary outcomes were radiographic progression and safety. RESULTS: TCZ-SC was superior to PBO-SC for ACR20 response at week 24 (60.9% versus 31.5%; P < 0.0001). All secondary end points showed TCZ-SC to be superior to PBO-SC, including ACR50 and ACR70 response (40% and 20% for TCZ-SC, respectively, and 12% and 5% for PBO-SC, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both) and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) remission (DAS28 <2.6; 32% versus 4% [P < 0.0001]). The mean change in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score was significantly lower in the TCZ-SC group than the PBO-SC group (0.62 versus 1.23; P = 0.0149). Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were comparable between the TCZ-SC and PBO-SC groups; 4.6% and 3.7% of patients had at least 1 SAE, respectively, and infection was the most common SAE in 2.1% and 1.8% of patients, respectively. More injection site reactions occurred with TCZ-SC than PBO-SC (7.1% versus 4.1%). No anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity reactions occurred. There were 3 deaths in the TCZ-SC group and 0 in the PBO-SC group. CONCLUSION: TCZ-SC every other week had significantly greater efficacy, including ACR end points and inhibition of joint damage, compared with PBO-SC. TCZ-SC was well tolerated and its safety profile was comparable with that of previous intravenous TCZ studies. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4276289/ /pubmed/24942540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22384 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Rheumatoid Arthritis Kivitz, Alan Olech, Ewa Borofsky, Michael Zazueta, Beatriz M Navarro-Sarabia, Federico Radominski, Sebastião C Merrill, Joan T Rowell, Lucy Nasmyth-Miller, Clare Bao, Min Wright, Stephen Pope, Janet E Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title | Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_full | Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_fullStr | Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_short | Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_sort | subcutaneous tocilizumab versus placebo in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Rheumatoid Arthritis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24942540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.22384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kivitzalan subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT olechewa subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT borofskymichael subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT zazuetabeatrizm subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT navarrosarabiafederico subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT radominskisebastiaoc subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT merrilljoant subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT rowelllucy subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT nasmythmillerclare subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT baomin subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT wrightstephen subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT popejanete subcutaneoustocilizumabversusplaceboincombinationwithdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |