Cargando…

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallamini, Andrea, Zwarthoed, Colette, Borra, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268160
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041821
_version_ 1782350322820186112
author Gallamini, Andrea
Zwarthoed, Colette
Borra, Anna
author_facet Gallamini, Andrea
Zwarthoed, Colette
Borra, Anna
author_sort Gallamini, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%–15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4276948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42769482015-01-15 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology Gallamini, Andrea Zwarthoed, Colette Borra, Anna Cancers (Basel) Review Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%–15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later. MDPI 2014-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4276948/ /pubmed/25268160 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041821 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gallamini, Andrea
Zwarthoed, Colette
Borra, Anna
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology
title Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology
title_full Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology
title_fullStr Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology
title_full_unstemmed Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology
title_short Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology
title_sort positron emission tomography (pet) in oncology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4276948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268160
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers6041821
work_keys_str_mv AT gallaminiandrea positronemissiontomographypetinoncology
AT zwarthoedcolette positronemissiontomographypetinoncology
AT borraanna positronemissiontomographypetinoncology