Cargando…

Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages

Network meta-analysis (NMA) – a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta-analysis simultaneously – has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neupane, Binod, Richer, Danielle, Bonner, Ashley Joel, Kibret, Taddele, Beyene, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115065
_version_ 1782350365843259392
author Neupane, Binod
Richer, Danielle
Bonner, Ashley Joel
Kibret, Taddele
Beyene, Joseph
author_facet Neupane, Binod
Richer, Danielle
Bonner, Ashley Joel
Kibret, Taddele
Beyene, Joseph
author_sort Neupane, Binod
collection PubMed
description Network meta-analysis (NMA) – a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta-analysis simultaneously – has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for implementing the methods are evolving. Both commercial and freely available statistical software packages have been developed to facilitate the statistical computations using NMA with varying degrees of functionality and ease of use. This paper aims to introduce the reader to three R packages, namely, gemtc, pcnetmeta, and netmeta, which are freely available software tools implemented in R. Each automates the process of performing NMA so that users can perform the analysis with minimal computational effort. We present, compare and contrast the availability and functionality of different important features of NMA in these three packages so that clinical investigators and researchers can determine which R packages to implement depending on their analysis needs. Four summary tables detailing (i) data input and network plotting, (ii) modeling options, (iii) assumption checking and diagnostic testing, and (iv) inference and reporting tools, are provided, along with an analysis of a previously published dataset to illustrate the outputs available from each package. We demonstrate that each of the three packages provides a useful set of tools, and combined provide users with nearly all functionality that might be desired when conducting a NMA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4277278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42772782014-12-31 Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages Neupane, Binod Richer, Danielle Bonner, Ashley Joel Kibret, Taddele Beyene, Joseph PLoS One Research Article Network meta-analysis (NMA) – a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta-analysis simultaneously – has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for implementing the methods are evolving. Both commercial and freely available statistical software packages have been developed to facilitate the statistical computations using NMA with varying degrees of functionality and ease of use. This paper aims to introduce the reader to three R packages, namely, gemtc, pcnetmeta, and netmeta, which are freely available software tools implemented in R. Each automates the process of performing NMA so that users can perform the analysis with minimal computational effort. We present, compare and contrast the availability and functionality of different important features of NMA in these three packages so that clinical investigators and researchers can determine which R packages to implement depending on their analysis needs. Four summary tables detailing (i) data input and network plotting, (ii) modeling options, (iii) assumption checking and diagnostic testing, and (iv) inference and reporting tools, are provided, along with an analysis of a previously published dataset to illustrate the outputs available from each package. We demonstrate that each of the three packages provides a useful set of tools, and combined provide users with nearly all functionality that might be desired when conducting a NMA. Public Library of Science 2014-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4277278/ /pubmed/25541687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115065 Text en © 2014 Neupane et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neupane, Binod
Richer, Danielle
Bonner, Ashley Joel
Kibret, Taddele
Beyene, Joseph
Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
title Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
title_full Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
title_fullStr Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
title_full_unstemmed Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
title_short Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
title_sort network meta-analysis using r: a review of currently available automated packages
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115065
work_keys_str_mv AT neupanebinod networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages
AT richerdanielle networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages
AT bonnerashleyjoel networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages
AT kibrettaddele networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages
AT beyenejoseph networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages