Cargando…
Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages
Network meta-analysis (NMA) – a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta-analysis simultaneously – has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115065 |
_version_ | 1782350365843259392 |
---|---|
author | Neupane, Binod Richer, Danielle Bonner, Ashley Joel Kibret, Taddele Beyene, Joseph |
author_facet | Neupane, Binod Richer, Danielle Bonner, Ashley Joel Kibret, Taddele Beyene, Joseph |
author_sort | Neupane, Binod |
collection | PubMed |
description | Network meta-analysis (NMA) – a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta-analysis simultaneously – has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for implementing the methods are evolving. Both commercial and freely available statistical software packages have been developed to facilitate the statistical computations using NMA with varying degrees of functionality and ease of use. This paper aims to introduce the reader to three R packages, namely, gemtc, pcnetmeta, and netmeta, which are freely available software tools implemented in R. Each automates the process of performing NMA so that users can perform the analysis with minimal computational effort. We present, compare and contrast the availability and functionality of different important features of NMA in these three packages so that clinical investigators and researchers can determine which R packages to implement depending on their analysis needs. Four summary tables detailing (i) data input and network plotting, (ii) modeling options, (iii) assumption checking and diagnostic testing, and (iv) inference and reporting tools, are provided, along with an analysis of a previously published dataset to illustrate the outputs available from each package. We demonstrate that each of the three packages provides a useful set of tools, and combined provide users with nearly all functionality that might be desired when conducting a NMA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4277278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42772782014-12-31 Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages Neupane, Binod Richer, Danielle Bonner, Ashley Joel Kibret, Taddele Beyene, Joseph PLoS One Research Article Network meta-analysis (NMA) – a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments in the same meta-analysis simultaneously – has become increasingly popular in the medical literature in recent years. The statistical methodology underpinning this technique and software tools for implementing the methods are evolving. Both commercial and freely available statistical software packages have been developed to facilitate the statistical computations using NMA with varying degrees of functionality and ease of use. This paper aims to introduce the reader to three R packages, namely, gemtc, pcnetmeta, and netmeta, which are freely available software tools implemented in R. Each automates the process of performing NMA so that users can perform the analysis with minimal computational effort. We present, compare and contrast the availability and functionality of different important features of NMA in these three packages so that clinical investigators and researchers can determine which R packages to implement depending on their analysis needs. Four summary tables detailing (i) data input and network plotting, (ii) modeling options, (iii) assumption checking and diagnostic testing, and (iv) inference and reporting tools, are provided, along with an analysis of a previously published dataset to illustrate the outputs available from each package. We demonstrate that each of the three packages provides a useful set of tools, and combined provide users with nearly all functionality that might be desired when conducting a NMA. Public Library of Science 2014-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4277278/ /pubmed/25541687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115065 Text en © 2014 Neupane et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Neupane, Binod Richer, Danielle Bonner, Ashley Joel Kibret, Taddele Beyene, Joseph Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages |
title | Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages |
title_full | Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages |
title_fullStr | Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages |
title_full_unstemmed | Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages |
title_short | Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages |
title_sort | network meta-analysis using r: a review of currently available automated packages |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neupanebinod networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages AT richerdanielle networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages AT bonnerashleyjoel networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages AT kibrettaddele networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages AT beyenejoseph networkmetaanalysisusingrareviewofcurrentlyavailableautomatedpackages |