Cargando…
THE HANDICAP PROCESS FAVORS EXAGGERATED, RATHER THAN REDUCED, SEXUAL ORNAMENTS
Why are traits that function as secondary sexual ornaments generally exaggerated in size compared to the naturally selected optimum, and not reduced? Because they deviate from the naturally selected optimum, traits that are reduced in size will handicap their bearer, and could thus provide an honest...
Autores principales: | Tazzyman, Samuel J, Iwasa, Yoh, Pomiankowski, Andrew |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24837599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/evo.12450 |
Ejemplares similares
-
SIGNALING EFFICACY DRIVES THE EVOLUTION OF LARGER SEXUAL ORNAMENTS BY SEXUAL SELECTION
por: Tazzyman, Samuel J, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Cell–cell signalling in sexual chemotaxis: a basis for gametic differentiation, mating types and sexes
por: Hadjivasiliou, Zena, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Does the handicap principle explain the evolution of dimorphic ornaments?
por: Számadó, Szabolcs, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Size rather than complexity of sexual ornaments prolongs male metamorphosis and explains sexual size dimorphism in sepsid flies
por: Rajaratnam, Gowri, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Medical Big Data Is Not Yet Available: Why We Need Realism Rather than Exaggeration
por: Kim, Hun-Sung, et al.
Publicado: (2019)