Cargando…

Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?

Being subject to intense post-copulatory selection, sperm size is a principal determining component of male fitness. Although previous studies have presented comparative sperm size data at higher taxonomic levels, information on the evolution of sperm size within species is generally lacking. Here,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albrechtová, Jana, Albrecht, Tomáš, Ďureje, Ludovít, Pallazola, Vincent A., Piálek, Jaroslav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115669
_version_ 1782350380341919744
author Albrechtová, Jana
Albrecht, Tomáš
Ďureje, Ludovít
Pallazola, Vincent A.
Piálek, Jaroslav
author_facet Albrechtová, Jana
Albrecht, Tomáš
Ďureje, Ludovít
Pallazola, Vincent A.
Piálek, Jaroslav
author_sort Albrechtová, Jana
collection PubMed
description Being subject to intense post-copulatory selection, sperm size is a principal determining component of male fitness. Although previous studies have presented comparative sperm size data at higher taxonomic levels, information on the evolution of sperm size within species is generally lacking. Here, we studied two house mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus, which undergo incipient speciation. We measured four sperm dimensions from cauda epididymis smears of 28 wild-caught mice of both subspecies. As inbred mouse strains are frequently used as proxies for exploring evolutionary processes, we further studied four wild-derived inbred strains from each subspecies. The subspecies differed significantly in terms of sperm head length and midpiece length, and these differences were consistent for wild mice and wild-derived strains pooled over genomes. When the inbred strains were analyzed individually, however, their strain-specific values were in some cases significantly shifted from subspecies-specific values derived from wild mice. We conclude that: (1) the size of sperm components differ in the two house mouse subspecies studied, and that (2) wild-derived strains reflect this natural polymorphism, serving as a potential tool to identify the genetic variation driving these evolutionary processes. Nevertheless, we suggest that more strains should be used in future experiments to account for natural variation and to avoid confounding results due to reduced variability and/or founder effect in the individual strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4277342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42773422014-12-31 Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story? Albrechtová, Jana Albrecht, Tomáš Ďureje, Ludovít Pallazola, Vincent A. Piálek, Jaroslav PLoS One Research Article Being subject to intense post-copulatory selection, sperm size is a principal determining component of male fitness. Although previous studies have presented comparative sperm size data at higher taxonomic levels, information on the evolution of sperm size within species is generally lacking. Here, we studied two house mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus, which undergo incipient speciation. We measured four sperm dimensions from cauda epididymis smears of 28 wild-caught mice of both subspecies. As inbred mouse strains are frequently used as proxies for exploring evolutionary processes, we further studied four wild-derived inbred strains from each subspecies. The subspecies differed significantly in terms of sperm head length and midpiece length, and these differences were consistent for wild mice and wild-derived strains pooled over genomes. When the inbred strains were analyzed individually, however, their strain-specific values were in some cases significantly shifted from subspecies-specific values derived from wild mice. We conclude that: (1) the size of sperm components differ in the two house mouse subspecies studied, and that (2) wild-derived strains reflect this natural polymorphism, serving as a potential tool to identify the genetic variation driving these evolutionary processes. Nevertheless, we suggest that more strains should be used in future experiments to account for natural variation and to avoid confounding results due to reduced variability and/or founder effect in the individual strains. Public Library of Science 2014-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4277342/ /pubmed/25541964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115669 Text en © 2014 Albrechtová et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Albrechtová, Jana
Albrecht, Tomáš
Ďureje, Ludovít
Pallazola, Vincent A.
Piálek, Jaroslav
Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?
title Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?
title_full Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?
title_fullStr Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?
title_full_unstemmed Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?
title_short Sperm Morphology in Two House Mouse Subspecies: Do Wild-Derived Strains and Wild Mice Tell the Same Story?
title_sort sperm morphology in two house mouse subspecies: do wild-derived strains and wild mice tell the same story?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115669
work_keys_str_mv AT albrechtovajana spermmorphologyintwohousemousesubspeciesdowildderivedstrainsandwildmicetellthesamestory
AT albrechttomas spermmorphologyintwohousemousesubspeciesdowildderivedstrainsandwildmicetellthesamestory
AT durejeludovit spermmorphologyintwohousemousesubspeciesdowildderivedstrainsandwildmicetellthesamestory
AT pallazolavincenta spermmorphologyintwohousemousesubspeciesdowildderivedstrainsandwildmicetellthesamestory
AT pialekjaroslav spermmorphologyintwohousemousesubspeciesdowildderivedstrainsandwildmicetellthesamestory