Cargando…

Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems

[Image: see text] Optical dimerizers are a powerful new class of optogenetic tools that allow light-inducible control of protein–protein interactions. Such tools have been useful for regulating cellular pathways and processes with high spatiotemporal resolution in live cells, and a growing number of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pathak, Gopal P., Strickland, Devin, Vrana, Justin D., Tucker, Chandra L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sb500291r
_version_ 1782350430956683264
author Pathak, Gopal P.
Strickland, Devin
Vrana, Justin D.
Tucker, Chandra L.
author_facet Pathak, Gopal P.
Strickland, Devin
Vrana, Justin D.
Tucker, Chandra L.
author_sort Pathak, Gopal P.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Optical dimerizers are a powerful new class of optogenetic tools that allow light-inducible control of protein–protein interactions. Such tools have been useful for regulating cellular pathways and processes with high spatiotemporal resolution in live cells, and a growing number of dimerizer systems are available. As these systems have been characterized by different groups using different methods, it has been difficult for users to compare their properties. Here, we set about to systematically benchmark the properties of four optical dimerizer systems, CRY2/CIB1, TULIPs, phyB/PIF3, and phyB/PIF6. Using a yeast transcriptional assay, we find significant differences in light sensitivity and fold-activation levels between the red light regulated systems but similar responses between the CRY2/CIB and TULIP systems. Further comparison of the ability of the CRY2/CIB1 and TULIP systems to regulate a yeast MAPK signaling pathway also showed similar responses, with slightly less background activity in the dark observed with CRY2/CIB. In the process of developing this work, we also generated an improved blue-light-regulated transcriptional system using CRY2/CIB in yeast. In addition, we demonstrate successful application of the CRY2/CIB dimerizers using a membrane-tethered CRY2, which may allow for better local control of protein interactions. Taken together, this work allows for a better understanding of the capacities of these different dimerization systems and demonstrates new uses of these dimerizers to control signaling and transcription in yeast.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4277767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42777672015-10-28 Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems Pathak, Gopal P. Strickland, Devin Vrana, Justin D. Tucker, Chandra L. ACS Synth Biol [Image: see text] Optical dimerizers are a powerful new class of optogenetic tools that allow light-inducible control of protein–protein interactions. Such tools have been useful for regulating cellular pathways and processes with high spatiotemporal resolution in live cells, and a growing number of dimerizer systems are available. As these systems have been characterized by different groups using different methods, it has been difficult for users to compare their properties. Here, we set about to systematically benchmark the properties of four optical dimerizer systems, CRY2/CIB1, TULIPs, phyB/PIF3, and phyB/PIF6. Using a yeast transcriptional assay, we find significant differences in light sensitivity and fold-activation levels between the red light regulated systems but similar responses between the CRY2/CIB and TULIP systems. Further comparison of the ability of the CRY2/CIB1 and TULIP systems to regulate a yeast MAPK signaling pathway also showed similar responses, with slightly less background activity in the dark observed with CRY2/CIB. In the process of developing this work, we also generated an improved blue-light-regulated transcriptional system using CRY2/CIB in yeast. In addition, we demonstrate successful application of the CRY2/CIB dimerizers using a membrane-tethered CRY2, which may allow for better local control of protein interactions. Taken together, this work allows for a better understanding of the capacities of these different dimerization systems and demonstrates new uses of these dimerizers to control signaling and transcription in yeast. American Chemical Society 2014-10-28 2014-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4277767/ /pubmed/25350266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sb500291r Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Pathak, Gopal P.
Strickland, Devin
Vrana, Justin D.
Tucker, Chandra L.
Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems
title Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems
title_full Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems
title_fullStr Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems
title_short Benchmarking of Optical Dimerizer Systems
title_sort benchmarking of optical dimerizer systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sb500291r
work_keys_str_mv AT pathakgopalp benchmarkingofopticaldimerizersystems
AT stricklanddevin benchmarkingofopticaldimerizersystems
AT vranajustind benchmarkingofopticaldimerizersystems
AT tuckerchandral benchmarkingofopticaldimerizersystems