Cargando…
A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
BACKGROUND: Syntheses of qualitative studies can inform health policy, services and our understanding of patient experience. Meta-ethnography is a systematic seven-phase interpretive qualitative synthesis approach well-suited to producing new theories and conceptual models. However, there are concer...
Autores principales: | France, Emma F, Ring, Nicola, Thomas, Rebecca, Noyes, Jane, Maxwell, Margaret, Jepson, Ruth |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-119 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases
por: France, Emma F., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
What's wrong with ethnography? : methodological explorations /
por: Hammersley, Martyn
Publicado: (1992) -
Protocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines (eMERGe)
por: France, E.F., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
por: France, Emma F., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
por: France, Emma F., et al.
Publicado: (2019)